Laparoscopic Antegrade Sphincterotomy A New Technique for the Management of Complex Choledocholithiasis

Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque.
Annals of Surgery (Impact Factor: 8.33). 03/1995; 221(2):149-55. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199502000-00004
Source: PubMed


Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy represents a new technique that expands the ability of the surgeon to manage complex choledocholithiasis at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The authors describe their experience with six patients with cholelithiasis and complex common bile duct stone disease who underwent successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy and antegrade sphincterotomies.
Patients with complex choledocholithiasis have represented a technical challenge to the minimally invasive surgeon. Recently, a laparoscopic technique of antegrade biliary sphincterotomy has been reported by DePaulo in Brazil. This technique has been successful at clearing the common bile duct at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy was performed in six patients with multiple common bile duct stones. A standard endoscopic sphincterotome was introduced antegrade via the cystic duct or common bile duct and guided through the ampulla. A side-viewing duodenoscope was used to confirm proper positioning of the sphincterotome. Then a blended current was applied until the sphincterotomy was complete.
There was no mortality or morbidity associated with laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy. The mean additional operative time to complete laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy was 19 minutes. Three of the six patients were noted to have transient, asymptomatic elevation in serum amylase levels immediately after surgery (average 252 international units/L; normal < 115), which normalized within 72 hours. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.9 days. At a mean follow-up of 5 months (range 1 to 10 months), five patients remain asymptomatic. One individual with acquired immune deficiency syndrome had persistent symptoms, and a diagnosis of cytomegalovirus pancreatitis was eventually made.
Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy appears to be a safe and effective technique for the management of complex biliary tract disease.

0 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most transcystic duct techniques of common bile duct (CBD) exploration involve dilation of the cystic duct with balloon dilators or sequential graduated bougies to access the CBD. Biliary flexible endoscopy is our primary approach to the CBD. Nevertheless, balloon trolling of the CBD, fluoroscopically guided wire basket stone retrieval, ampullary balloon dilation with lavage, and transcystic endoscopically assisted sphincterotomy are all techniques that can be employed laparoscopically via the cystic duct without the need for dilation.
    Surgical Endoscopy 12/1995; 9(11):1240-2. DOI:10.1089/lap.1998.8.173 · 3.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Annals of Surgery 09/1996; 224(2):236. · 8.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Open exploration and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) remain the preferred treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS). The recent spread of laparoscopy has worsened the dilemna of choosing between surgical and endoscopic treatment of CBDS. The aim of this study was to critically evaluate the results of our preliminary experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (CBDE) for CBDS. Ninety-two consecutive patients were prospectively submitted to laparoscopic CBDE. Surgical strategy included an initial transcystic approach or laparoscopic choledochotomy. Failure of stone clearance was managed by conversion to open CBDE or by postoperative ES. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy and papillary balloon dilatation were selectively used. Stone clearance was assessed by choledochoscopy and control cholangiography. The overall laparoscopic stone clearance in this series was 84% (transcystic route 63% and choledochotomy 93%). Conversion to laparotomy was mandatory in 12% of the patients because of incomplete stone clearance and in 5% because of intraoperative complications. Postoperative ES was required in 4% of the patients, giving an overall surgical success rate of 96%. When indicated (small and limited number of stones located below the cysticocholedochal junction, with a dilated and patent cystic duct) the transcystic route had the lower success rate, the higher complication rate, and the shorter operative time and postoperative hospital stay. When indicated (accessible and dilated common bile duct over 7 mm), laparoscopic choledochotomy had the higher success rate, the lower complication rate, the longer operative time, and the longer postoperative hospital stay, which is related to associated external biliary drainage. The hospital mortality included two high-risk patients (2%) and the complications rate was 15%. Laparoscopic CBDE is safe in selected patients. A stratified intraoperative surgical strategy is mandatory in deciding between a transcystic route and choledochotomy with specific indications for each approach. When feasible, laparoscopic choledochotomy is more efficient and safe than the transcystic route, but it is associated with a longer postoperative hospital stay, which is due to external biliary drainage.
    Surgical Endoscopy 08/1997; 11(7):722-8. DOI:10.1007/s004649900436 · 3.26 Impact Factor
Show more


0 Reads
Available from