Systemically induced contact dermatitis from dental rosin. Scand J Dent Res

Department of Occupational Dermatology, General Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Scandinavian journal of dental research 01/1995; 102(6):376-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1994.tb01487.x
Source: PubMed


Rosin is a ubiquitous contact sensitizer which may be present in dental materials such as periodontal dressings, impression materials, cements, and cavity varnishes When a hypersensitive person is exposed to a sensitizer, allergic contact dermatitis/stomatitis may develop, most commonly after direct skin/mucosa contact with the sensitizer. However, widespread dermatitis may develop after systemic administration of the sensitizer, and this paper reports the case of a rosin-hypersensitive man who developed widespread eczematous dermatitis after dental treatment with a rosin-containing product.

1 Follower
7 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Oral mucous membrane contact dermatitis (or contact stomatitis) is relatively rare. In general, the mucosa is more resistant to primary irritants, and is not as readily sensitized as the skin. The oral mucosa is also constantly bathed in saliva, which washes sensitizers from the mucosal surface and prevents adequate contact. Furthermore, abundant mucosal vasculature allows for rapid absorption and clearing of allergens. Nevertheless, contact reactions can occur on the oral mucous membrane. Contact sensitivity has been described as a factor in recurrent oral ulceration43 and 32 and oral lichenoid reactions.52 As with other types of contact dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis may be difficult to distinguish from irritant contact dermatitis, and it may also mimic oral changes of vitamin deficiency, certain anemias, uremic stomatitis, and candidiasis.18 Although the prevalence of allergic contact sensitivity in the mouth is unknown, a number of substances have been reported to cause oral symptoms.
    Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America 08/1997; 17(3):471-485. DOI:10.1016/S0889-8561(05)70322-2 · 1.82 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The practice of fixed prosthodontic has changed dramatically with the introduction of innovative techniques and materials. Adhesive resin systems are examples of these changes that have led to the popularity of bonded ceramics and resin-retained fixed partial dentures. Today's dentist has the choice of a water-based luting agent (zinc phosphate, zinc polycarboxylate, glass ionomer, or reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol) or a resin system with or without an adhesive. Recent formulations of glass ionomer luting agents include resin components (resin-modified glass ionomers), which are increasingly popular in clinical practice. PURPOSE: This review summarizes the research on these systems with the goal of providing information that will help the reader choose the most suitable material. MATERIAL: The scientific studies have been evaluated in relation to the following categories: (1) biocompatibility, (2) caries or plaque inhibition, (3) microleakage, (4) strength and other mechanical properties, (5) solubility, (6) water sorption, (7) adhesion, (8) setting stresses, (9) wear resistance, (10) color stability, (11) radiopacity, (12) film thickness or viscosity, and (13) working and setting times. In addition, guidelines on luting-agent manipulation are related to available literature and include: (1) temporary cement removal, (2) smear layer removal, (3) powder/liquid ratio, (4) mixing temperature and speed, (5) seating force and vibration, and (6) moisture control. Tables of available products and their properties are also presented together with current recommendations by the authors with a rationale.
    Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 10/1998; 80(3):280-301. DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70128-3 · 1.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose of this investigation was to determine the cytocompatibility of various periodontal dressing materials by means of human primary gingival fibroblasts (HGF), human osteoblast-like cells (HObl) derived from the alveolar bone, and permanent 3T3 mouse fibroblasts (3T3). Cell culture medium extracts (time periods of extraction: day 1 and between day 2 and day 8 after setting) as well as solid specimens of the following materials were investigated: Coe-pak, Voco pac, Peripac, and Barricaid. Responses of cultures exposed for 24 h and 48 h to these materials were monitored by the fluorescent dyes H33342 and sulforhodamin 101 as well as by light microscopy. It was found that most extracts of Voco pac, Peripac, and Barricaid did not inhibit growth of HGF. Coe-Pak, however, clearly reduced the proliferation of HGF compared to untreated controls. Peripac decreased growth of HObl whereas Coe-Pak, Voco pac, and Barricaid caused no cytotoxic alterations in any of the test assays. Contrary to HGF and HObl, 3T3 cells were much more irritated by the test materials. But the light-curing resinous material Barricaid reduced proliferation of 3T3-fibroblasts only slightly. Our data indicate that Barricaid is exceedingly cytocompatible, whereas all other materials revealed moderate or severe cytotoxic effects according to the cell type.
    Clinical Oral Investigations 04/1999; 3(1):41-8. DOI:10.1007/s007840050077 · 2.35 Impact Factor
Show more