Article

Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary results of a prospective, comparative study.

Second Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital of Bolzano, Italy.
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (Impact Factor: 3.34). 01/1995; 37(12):1189-93.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to compare the value of endoluminal ultrasonography (ELUS) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma.
Thirty-seven consecutive patients were examined by ELUS and MRI. Imaging results were compared with pathohistologic studies. A tumor extending beyond the bowel wall was considered to be "positive" and one within the bowel wall was considered "negative." Lymph node involvement was considered present if nodes equal to or greater than 5 mm in diameter were found in the perirectal tissue. For evaluating the differences between the two methods, the Mc Nemar test was performed.
T-Staging was correct in 88.2 percent (30/34) of patients by ELUS and in 82.3 percent (28/34) by MRI (difference not significant). N-Staging was correct in 80 percent (20/25) by ELUS and in 60 percent (15/25) by MRI (difference of borderline significance). A comprehensive preoperative staging (T + N) was made correctly in 68 percent (17/25) by ELUS and in 48 percent only (12/25) by MRI (difference not significant).
We suggest that ELUS and MRI must be evaluated within the framework of established parameters when treatment modalities such as preoperative radiation therapy and local or radical surgical approach must be decided.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
51 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Accurate preoperative staging of anorectal neoplasia is required to identify patients for whom local excision or adjuvant therapy may be appropriate. The objectives of this study were to review the accuracy of endoluminal transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in the staging of rectal cancers and to determine the learning curve before optimal staging accuracy can be achieved. The results of all TRUS examinations for the assessment of anorectal neoplasia performed by two colorectal surgeons at two teaching hospitals of the University of Sydney from 1991 to 2001 were collected prospectively. Of the 433 patients examined by TRUS, 356 were included, of whom 263 (73.9 per cent) had nodal status assessed histologically. Of the 77 patients excluded, 50 had undergone radiotherapy before operation. TRUS achieved excellent accuracy when compared with histopathology reports using kappa statistics for standard Union Internacional Contra la Cancrum (UICC) staging (kappa = 0.89), tumour wall penetration (kappa = 0.70), lymph node detection (kappa = 0.66) and a proposed new staging system (kappa = 0.94). In addition, the increase in TRUS accuracy with operator experience demonstrates the need to perform 50 or more procedures before optimal accuracy is achieved. TRUS provides an appropriate investigation with which to select patients with T1 tumours for local excision, and patients with T3 or T4 tumours for preoperative radiotherapy. The relative inaccuracy of staging T2 tumours by TRUS has led to a proposed alternative ultrasonographic staging system.
    British Journal of Surgery 04/2003; 90(3):346-50. · 4.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Thirty to forty percent of villous adenomas can be an occult carcinoma. Even biopsy can miss the diagnosis. Rectal endosonography can be useful to detect these malignant tumors. Aim: To assess the usefulness of rectal endosonography to detect invasive carcinoma and eventual lymph node involvement in villous adenomas. Material and methods: Retrospective review of 1400 rectal endosonographies performed between years 2000 and 2006. Those cases in which a rectal villous adenoma was informed, that were subjected to surgical excisión and that had a pathology report were included in the study. Results: Thirty five rectal endosonographies were informed as rectal villous adenoma and 28 had a pathology report. In 17 of the latter, an invasive carcinoma was detected on pathology. The concordance between pathology and rectal endosonography to detect the carcinoma was 82%. Positive and negative predictive valúes, sensitivity and specificity of endosonography to detect carcinoma were 100, 69, 71 and 100% respectively. The concordance to differentiate T0-T1 lesions from deeper lesions and to detect lymph node involvement was 75 and 84% respectively. Conclusions: Rectal endosonography is useful to detect carcinomas in villous adenoma and to determine the stage of such tumors.
    Revista chilena de cirugía. 01/2008; 60(4).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The ability of endorectal ultrasonography (EU) to detect the presence of a malignant focus within rectal villous adenomas was studied. Clinical charts were reviewed of 62 consecutive patients undergoing EU of rectal villous adenomas, in whom histologic confirmation was available. Twelve lesions were found to contain cancer, of which only two demonstrated clinical signs of induration. Positive predictive value of EU for detecting a malignant focus was 66.7 percent, negative predictive value was 88.7 percent, sensitivity was 50 percent, and specificity was 94 percent. There was moderate overall agreement between pathologic and ultrasound staging (kappa statistic, 0.48). When an optimal image was obtained, all cancers that penetrated the submucosa were detected. Sensitivity of the technique was compromised in some large exophytic lesions and those at the level of the anal sphincter because of artefacts produced in the ultrasonographic image. A clear EU image can detect a malignant focus within a villous adenoma and direct the surgeon to the appropriate plane of surgical resection. In lesions with an ambiguous image, a malignancy cannot be excluded.
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 11/1995; 38(10):1093-6. · 3.34 Impact Factor