Article

Evaluation of a recombinant vaccinia virus containing pseudorabies (PR) virus glycoprotein genes gp50, gII, and gIII as a PR vaccine for pigs.

Virology Swine Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, Iowa.
Archives of Virology (impact factor: 2.11). 01/1994; 134(3-4):259-69. pp.259-69
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Pigs vaccinated twice intramuscularly with a highly attenuated strain of vaccinia virus (NYVAC) containing gene inserts for pseudorabies virus (PRV) glycoproteins gp50, gII, and gIII produced neutralizing antibodies for PRV and were less clinically affected than were nonvaccinated pigs following oronasal exposure to virulent PRV. Also, following oronasal exposure to virulent PRV the duration of virulent virus shedding by pigs that had been vaccinated intramuscularly with the recombinant virus was statistically less (p < 0.05) than that of nonvaccinated pigs and like that of pigs vaccinated twice intramuscularly with inactivated PR vaccine. Intramuscular vaccination with the recombinant virus was compatible with the most commonly used differential diagnostic tests, namely those based on PRV glycoproteins gX and gI. Serum antibodies for these glycoproteins were absent from the sera of all pigs before and after vaccination with recombinant virus; whereas, they were present in the sera of all of the same pigs after they were exposed to virulent PRV. In contrast to the effectiveness of the recombinant virus administered intramuscularly, neither serum antibody nor clinical protection against PRV was detected when aliquots of the same recombinant virus preparation were administered either orally or intranasally. The latter finding suggests that recombinant virus replicates poorly, if at all, at these sites. If so, the dissemination of recombinant virus from vaccinated pigs to nonvaccinated pigs or other animals in contact seems unlikely.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
21 Views
  • Article: Molecular biology of pseudorabies (Aujeszky's disease) virus.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this review, some of the aspects concerning the molecular biology of pseudorabies virus (PrV), the causative agent of Aujeszky's disease, will be discussed. It will mainly focus on new findings concerning viral glycoproteins, factors determining PrV virulence, the problem of PrV latency and the development regarding genetically engineered vaccines.
    Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 02/1991; 14(2):151-63. · 2.34 Impact Factor
  • Article: Spread and control of Aujeszky's disease (AD).
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The review deals with practical aspects of control and eradication of Aujeszky's disease (AD) and the various factors concerned with it. These are resistance of virus to environmental conditions, amounts of virus necessary for infection, virus excretion, virus latency, mode of virus transmission, and vaccination. Notification of AD is a precondition of control. Several measures are necessary on the infected farm to prevent virus spread. Eradication can be done by slaughter of all the seropositive animals. However, until recently this is impossible in severely infected vaccinated areas on economic reasons. The development of glycoprotein-deleted vaccines now allows the differentiation between vaccinated and infected animals by ELISA. Thus, a combination of vaccination and removal of infected pigs is possible, resulting in a more economic way of expanded eradication.
    Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 02/1991; 14(2):165-73. · 2.34 Impact Factor
  • Article: Vaccination against pseudorabies with glycoprotein gI+ or glycoprotein gI- vaccine.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Subunit pseudorabies vaccines that contained only purified glycoproteins of either of 2 strains of pseudorabies virus (PRV) were prepared and subsequently tested for safety and efficacy. The strains of virus used for vaccine production differed in at least 2 properties. One strain (Kojnok) was virulent for pigs and was believed to code for the entire complement of viral glycoproteins. The other (Kaplan) was a deletion mutant that was unable to code for structural viral glycoproteins gI and gp63. Purified glycoproteins were dispersed in an oil-in-water emulsion and were administered IM to pigs. Both vaccines were found to be safe and effective immunogens. Neither caused any local or general reactions, as verified by examination of the injection site (local safety) and by vaccination of pregnant sows in PRV-infected and noninfected herds. Sows vaccinated with the gI+ or gI- vaccine protected their pigs at levels of 93 and 92%, respectively, against a severe challenge exposure that killed 98% of pigs born from nonvaccinated sows. Vaccinated pigs were tested for active immunity by intranasal challenge exposure with the NIA 3 strain. Protection was quantitated by measuring the relative daily weight difference, expressed in percent per day, between vaccinated and control pigs during the first week after challenge exposure (delta G7); the estimated differences were 2.25 and 2.13% for gI+ and gI- vaccines, respectively. The absence of gI and gp63 did not affect the efficacy of this type of subunit glycoprotein vaccines.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    American Journal of Veterinary Research 08/1990; 51(7):1100-6. · 1.27 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from

Keywords

attenuated strain
 
clinical protection
 
differential diagnostic tests
 
inactivated PR vaccine
 
Intramuscular vaccination
 
intramuscularly
 
neutralizing antibodies
 
nonvaccinated pigs
 
oronasal exposure
 
PRV
 
PRV glycoproteins gX
 
pseudorabies virus
 
recombinant virus
 
recombinant virus preparation
 
recombinant virus replicates
 
Serum antibodies
 
serum antibody
 
vaccinia virus
 
virulent PRV
 
virulent virus
 

W L Mengeling