In defence of pedagogy: A critique of the notion of andragogy
ABSTRACT Malcolm Knowles' theory of andragogy has gained increasing acceptance among nurse educators. Andragogy is espoused as a progressive educational theory, adopted as a theoretical underpinning for curricula and is even considered to be synonymous with a variety of teaching techniques and strategies such as 'problem-based' and 'self-directed' learning. This paper offers a critique of the notion of andragogy which maintains that the distinction created between andragogy and pedagogy is spurious and based upon assumptions which are untenable. It is argued that andragogy has been uncritically accepted within nursing education in much the same way that the nursing process and models of nursing were in their day. Finally, it is claimed that true pedagogy has far more radical, powerful and transformative possibilities for nursing education.
Full-textDOI: · Available from: Philip Darbyshire, Jul 21, 2014
- SourceAvailable from: qou.edu
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "Potential problems for teachers in releasing students from control were also highlighted, supporting the views of Darbyshire (1993), Katz (1995) and Rolfe (1993). This may add to the dif®culty that students experience in SDL, and may be exacerbated when it is used occasionally in an otherwise teacher-led course. "
ABSTRACT: To explore teachers' and students' understanding of the term 'self-directed learning', and elicit their views of its value in paediatric intensive care nurse education. A qualitative case study, including a field diary, document examination, interviews with teachers and students, observation, and a student learning diary, was used to collect data. The study showed that teachers and students experienced some difficulty in articulating an exact definition of self-directed learning. They considered it to be of some value, but only when used in conjunction with teacher-led methods of learning. Attempts to implement self-directed learning in an observable form have led to confusion about its nature. It is also important to consider how far an educational philosophy or approach is congruent with the reality of any given course of study, as opposed to focusing on observable teaching and learning tools or methods.Nursing standard: official newspaper of the Royal College of Nursing 09/2002; 17(1):33-8. DOI:10.7748/ns2002.09.17.1.33.c3267
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "In recent years nurses have become increasingly concerned that the scientific and technological aspects of nursing are in danger of overshadowing the humanistic and artistic elements, which should be an integral part of both nursing education and nursing practice (see e.g. Benner & Wrubel 1989, Younger 1990, Darbyshire 1993). These concerns have been prompted by a growing awareness that understanding nursing care cannot develop from a background of education which focuses solely upon physical and social sciences and which neglects the arts and humanities. "
ABSTRACT: It is often claimed that nursing is both an art and a science, yet nursing education has been reluctant to accord arts and literature a prominent place within nursing curricula. While the discipline of medical humanities has been developing for around two decades, there has been no comparable movement within nursing. This paper describes the development, implementation and initial hermeneutic evaluation of a new course, 'Understanding Caring Through Arts and Humanities' which we believe to be unique in being a fully accredited unit which is offered within a BA (Honours) Health Studies Degree for nurses and other health care professionals.Journal of Advanced Nursing 06/1994; 19(5):856-63. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01161.x · 1.69 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Introduction The purpose of this study was to improve Indonesian nursing students' self-directed learning readiness. An educational intervention program (EIP) was developed, implemented and evaluated. Background to the study Many studies have documented the need for nursing students to be prepared for the rapidly changing and complex health care environment. Lifelong, self-directed learning (SDL) has been identified as an important ability for nursing graduates. However, no study has documented the needs of, or preparation required for, nursing students to function effectively in the rapidly changing health care system in Indonesia. The Indonesian diploma nursing schools still use a teacher-centred approach with little emphasis on a student-centred approach. Method The study used a mixed method involving both quantitative and qualitative design. Simple random sampling was used to select an intervention school and control school. The sample was 2nd year nursing students with 47 in the intervention group and 54 in the control group. A pre-post test questionnaire, using the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale (Guglielmino, 1978), was used to collect quantitative data and focus group discussions (FGD) were used to collect qualitative data regarding students' perceptions of SDL prior to and at the completion of study. The intervention group received an EIP. The Staged Self-Directed Learning Model (Grow, 1991) and the Teacher Student Control Continuum (D'A Slevin & Lavery, 1991) were used as the organising framework. A self-learning module and learning plans were used as learning strategies to operationalise SDL concepts alongside teacher-centred methods. The control group received the existing teacher-centred methods. At the completion of the intervention, clinical instructors from both the intervention and control groups participated in FGD to explore their perceptions of students' activities during the EIP. Results For the majority of students, readiness for SDL was 'below average'. The mean for the Indonesian nursing students was significantly lower than established norms (Guglielmino, 1978). The introduction of SDL concepts through an EIP improved the level of readiness for SDL in the intervention group from 'below average' to 'average' compared to the control group who remained in the 'below average' range. Higher SDL readiness was reported by female students and students who completed the educational intervention. The FGD before the intervention revealed that students perceived SDL as a 'self-activity'. Perceptions of students in the intervention group changed during the EIP compared to students in the control group. Students in the intervention group viewed SDL as a 'process of learning'. Increased self-confidence, incremental learning, and having direction in learning were identified as benefits of SDL. Knowledge and skills in SDL, learning materials and communication were identified as important issues that needed to be improved. Clinical Instructors' perceptions of students' clinical activities confirmed that students in the intervention group were 'more active' compared to the control group who were 'still inactive'. Conclusion The study confirmed the expected effect of the EIP on students' SDL readiness. The EIP improved nursing students' readiness for SDL and had a positive impact on students' perceptions of SDL. Introducing the concept of SDL through the EIP was found acceptable by the sample and was deemed feasible to implement within the Indonesian nursing education system. The study has potential to make a significant contribution to nursing education in Indonesia by promoting lifelong learning and SDL in nursing students and in curricula through the development of innovative curricula and teaching and learning practices. The study also has potential wider benefit to nursing practice and global health practice.