Article

Temporal course of change of depression.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (Impact Factor: 4.85). 11/1993; 61(5):858-64. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.61.5.858
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Two hundred fifty moderately to severely depressed outpatients were randomly assigned to 16 weeks of cognitive-behavioral therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, imipramine plus clinical management (IMI-CM), or pill placebo plus clinical management. Two hundred thirty-nine patients actually began treatment. The most rapid change in depressive symptoms occurred in the IMI-CM condition, which achieved significantly better results than the other treatments at 8 and 12 weeks on 1 or more variables. Change over the course of treatment on variables hypothesized to be most specifically affected by the respective treatments was found only in the case of pharmacotherapy, in which imipramine produced significantly greater changes on the endogenous measure at 8 and 12 weeks.

0 Followers
 · 
235 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Questions regarding the efficacy of antidepressant drugs has been a recent focus of attention in the national news both in print and in the television media. Many clients will have questions regarding what they can believe and how they can address mood problems. Social workers constitute a greater percentage of the mental health work force than any other profession. Thus, social workers will probably be asked by clients about these issues. This paper presents information on the efficacy of antidepressants for both the short and long term. It covers adverse effects and withdrawal symptoms. Clients’ self-determination should be honored. However, social workers can be of assistance in supplying facts relevant to decision making.
    Social Work in Mental Health 11/2012; DOI:10.1080/15332985.2012.699444
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intervening with depressed women during their childbearing years, especially with those on low incomes, is critically important. Not only do mothers and expectant mothers suffer unnecessarily, but their untreated depression has critical negative consequences for their families. Despite this, these women have proven especially difficult to engage in psychotherapy. In this paper we describe several adaptations and additions we have made to a brief form of Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) to meet the needs of mothers and expectant mothers living on low incomes in the community who suffer from depression, but face significant practical, psychological, and cultural barriers to engaging in and staying in treatment. In addition, we present some preliminary data on the extent to which our enhanced, brief IPT approach promotes improvements in treatment engagement and retention relative to usual care for expectant mothers on low incomes.
    Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy 03/2008; 38(1):23-33. DOI:10.1007/s10879-007-9065-x
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Marital adjustment and treatment outcome were evaluated in the Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program, a multicenter clinical trial evaluating interpersonal psychotherapy, cognitive therapy, imipramine, and placebo. Marital adjustment and depression were assessed pre- and posttreatment, and depression was assessed at 6, 12, and 18 months after treatment. Results indicate that (a) there was a significant improvement in marital adjustment after treatment, (b) this effect was not moderated by treatment type, and (c) this effect was mediated by change in depression. Poor pretreatment marital adjustment was modestly associated with negative outcome, whereas poor posttreatment marital adjustment was strongly associated with negative outcome during follow-up. The findings suggest that poor marital adjustment at the end of active treatment is a risk factor for increases in depression severity during follow-up.
    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 03/2001; 69(1):125-9. DOI:10.1037//0022-006X.69.1.125 · 4.85 Impact Factor