[Postoperative respiratory function and cholecystectomy by laparoscopic approach].

Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez.
Annales Françaises d Anesthésie et de Réanimation (Impact Factor: 0.84). 02/1993; 12(3):273-7.
Source: PubMed


Open cholecystectomy is associated with characteristic changes in pulmonary function showing a restrictive pattern. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without opening of the peritoneal cavity could be an alternative in reducing postoperative respiratory dysfunction. Having given their informed consent, 13 healthy ASA1 patients (age: 41 +/- 18 yrs) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled in this study, in order to assess their postoperative pulmonary function tests (forced vital capacity [FRC], forced expiratory volume [FEV1], functional residual capacity [FRC]) before operation (T0) and 4 h (T4), 24 h (T24), 48 h (T48) after surgery. Anaesthesia technique was the same associating propofol-atracurium-fentanyl, 50% N2O/O2. Ventilation was adapted to maintain end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure up to 30-35 mmHg. Postoperative analgesic regimen consisted of paracetamol-ketoprofen. Mean length of surgery was 84 +/- 15 min; mean duration of anaesthesia was 110 +/- 24 min. An immediate and harmonious restrictive breathing pattern developed postoperatively. Postoperative FVC measured 65% (T4), 63% (T24), 72% (T48) of preoperative function (p < 0.025); postoperative FEV1 measured respectively 60, 66 and 75% of preoperative function (p > 0.001), without change in FEV1/CV and FRC; a significant hypoxia occurred (T0: 86 mmHg, T4: 80 mmHg, T24: 75 mmHg, T48: 81 mmHg [p < 0.05]). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy resulted in less postoperative respiratory dysfunction than conventional cholecystectomy, as previously reported; this restrictive pattern observed without changes in FRC was similar to that following lower abdominal surgery.

1 Read
  • Source
    Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões 10/2007; 34(5). DOI:10.1590/S0100-69912007000500009
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJETIVO: Avaliar a função pulmonar pós-colecistectomias laparoscópicas e subcostais abertas. MÉTODOS: Tratou-se de um ensaio randomizado, onde se avaliaram espirometrias pós-operatórias de dois grupos, cada qual com 15 pacientes. O grupo GL foi submetido a colecistectomia laparoscópica. O grupo GA foi submetido a colecistectomia por via subcostal, por meio de mini-laparotomia e abreviado tempo anestésico-cirúrgico. As variáveis dos dois grupos foram comparadas entre si por meio da ANOVA. Entre um mesmo grupo, antes e depois das operações, utlizou-se do teste t-Student emparelhado. Um valor de p < 0,05 foi considerado estatisticamente significativo. RESULTADOS: Todas as pacientes, dos dois grupos, apresentaram distúrbios ventilatórios restritivos pós-operatórios, com normalização espirométrica mais rápida nas pacientes operadas por laparoscopia. Grupos GL X GA, no pós-operatório imediato: Capacidade vital forçada (p < 0,001) e Volume Expiratório forçado em 1 segundo (p < 0,001). CONCLUSÕES: O prejuízo pós-operatório da função pulmonar foi significativamente menor nas colecistectomias laparoscópicas do que nas abertas, mesmo por meio de mini-laparotomia e abreviado tempo anestésico-cirúrgico.
    Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões 10/2007; 34(5):326-330.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate pulmonary function after laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Prospective study, in which the post-operative spirometries of 15 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomies with abbreviated anesthetic-surgical time were analyzed. Significant differences existed for the Forced Vital Capacity variable (p=0,020) and Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (p=0,022) between pre- and immediate post-operative, indicating restrictive ventilatory disturbances. Light restrictive laparoscopic post-cholecystectomy ventilatory disturbances were observed, with rapid recovery of pulmonary function, which may lower post-operative pulmonary morbidity.
    Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões 08/2009; 36(4):307-11. DOI:10.1590/S0100-69912009000400006
Show more