Bladder volume estimation in the elderly using a portable ultrasound-based measurement device

Centre for Studies in Aging, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology 05/1993; 17(3):99-103. DOI: 10.3109/03091909309016214
Source: PubMed


We assessed the accuracy and ease of use of the BladderScan (BVI 2000) portable ultrasound-based bladder volume measurement device in a geriatric outpatient population. The Geriatric Continence Clinic nurse and physician each made 73 measurements on 36 subjects. Although the correlation coefficients between the true and ultrasound measurements were highly significant the mean differences were significantly different from zero. We suggest that, rather than considering the correlation coefficient, the accuracy required of the device should be described by a function of estimated versus true bladder volume. This function should vary depending on each particular decision-making process in which the estimate of volume is to be used. This instrument automatically estimates bladder volume once the user has completed the image creation and selection part of the process. The users in this study had difficulties with this imaging process. Possible ways in which the device's automated signal processing and volume calculation algorithms could be improved became evident during this study and are discussed.

7 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Thèse (M. Sc. A.)--École Polytechnique de Montréal, 1999. Comprend des réf. bibliogr.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We sought to assess the accuracy, reliability, and clinical utility of the noninvasive determination of bladder volume using an automated, compact three-dimensional (3-D) ultrasound device. We prospectively tested 249 adult outpatients for accuracy (n = 182), by comparing scan versus catheter volumes, or reliability (n = 67), by comparing the scan readings of two independent observers. Two models of the bladder scan device were tested (BVI-2500, 1994 and 1995 models). Scan and catheter volumes were correlated (y = 1.02x + 12.6, R2 = 0.90, P < 0.001) across a range of zero to 1015 cc, regardless of which machine model was used. Scan volume underestimated catheter volume by an average of 10 cc in men and 20 cc in women. If a scan-predicted volume of 100 cc or greater were used as a cutpoint for clinical importance, the device exhibited a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 91%, and an overall accuracy of 94%. These results were not affected by age, gender, height, weight, diagnosis, uterine presence/prostate size, or user experience. The two observers, one a graduate physician and the other a college student, achieved essentially the same volume determinations (y = 0.96x + 0.13, R2 = 0.90, P < 0.001). Volume determinations obtained with the bladder scan device are accurate and reliable in adult outpatients. A special technician is not required. These results may be attributable to use of automated planimetry and 3-D volumetry, rather than a fixed geometric formula, to custom measure each bladder shape.
    Urology 09/1997; 50(3):341-8. DOI:10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00293-8 · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the quality of studies seeking to establish measurement properties (reliability and validity) of ultrasonic estimation of urinary bladder volume. Online searching of the MEDLINE database between 1966 and 1995, and scanning of bibliography of known studies on ultrasonic bladder volume estimation. Study selection and study quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Each article was evaluated for suitability of the reference standard, adequacy of reported blinding of the observers and appropriateness of the statistical index of concordance. The last two of these guidelines were applied to reliability studies (evaluating the relation among observed ultrasonic estimations), and all three guidelines were applied to validity studies (evaluating the relation of ultrasonic estimation with a definitive measurement). One hundred and twenty-five participants enrolled in the five reliability studies and 769 participants in the 27 validity studies selected for appraisal of their quality. Rate of study compliance with preset criteria for high quality. None of the studies complied with all of the criteria for high methodologic quality. In the five reliability studies, investigators did not report adequate blinding of observers in three (60%) and an appropriate index of reliability was not used in any. Among the 27 validity studies, there was a lack of a suitable reference standard in 6 (22%), an inadequate blinding in 25 (93%), and an inappropriate index of validity in all (100%). Based on our guidelines for quality assessment, a large proportion of studies on measurement properties was found to have inadequate methods, raising concern about the credibility of the reliability and validity estimates reported. These deficiencies highlight the lack of rigour employed in the design, conduct and analysis of reliability and validity studies, which has the potential for leading to patient mismanagement due to biases in the assessment of measurement variability in clinical investigations.
    British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 10/1997; 104(9):1036-42. DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12063.x
Show more