Article

Reorganization of the chick basilar papilla after acoustic trauma.

Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-0506.
The Journal of Comparative Neurology (Impact Factor: 3.66). 05/1993; 330(4):521-32. DOI: 10.1002/cne.903300408
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The auditory epithelium in birds and mammals consists of a postmitotic population of hair cells and supporting cells. Unlike mammals, birds can regenerate their auditory epithelia after trauma. Recent evidence indicates that supporting cells undergo mitosis after acoustic trauma, suggesting that supporting cells may transdifferentiate into hair cells. The goals of this study were to 1) characterize the responses of hair cells and supporting cells to acoustic trauma, and 2) determine whether hair cell loss is a prerequisite for generation of new hair cells. Chicks were exposed to an octave-band noise and their inner ears assayed with fluorescence or scanning electron microscopy. In one area of the basilar papilla, defined as the center of the lesion, extensive hair cell degeneration occurred. Expanded supporting cells obliterated degenerating hair cells and invaded spaces normally occupied by hair cells. Aggregates of DNA were found within the basilar papilla, suggesting that hair cell death and disintegration may occur within the epithelium. The epithelial sheet appeared structurally confluent at all times examined. Supporting cells exhibited altered apical contour in distal regions of the basilar papilla, where hair cell damage was mild or inconspicuous. Four days after noise exposure, newly generated hair cells were found in the center of the lesion and in the distal areas, where no hair cell loss could be detected. The results suggest that supporting cells may play an important role in maintenance and repair of the traumatized basilar papilla and raise the possibility that production of new hair cells is not dependent on hair cell loss in the immediate vicinity.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
39 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mammalian auditory hair cells (HCs) are inserted into a well structured environment of supporting cells (SCs) and acellular matrices. It has been proposed that when HCs are irreversibly damaged by noise or ototoxic drugs, surrounding SCs seal the epithelial surface and likely extend the survival of auditory neurons. Because SCs are more resistant to damage than HCs, the effects of primary SC loss on HC survival and hearing have received little attention. We used the Cre/loxP system in mice to specifically ablate pillar cells (PCs) and Deiters' cells (DCs). In Prox1CreER(T2)+/-;Rosa26(DTA/+) (Prox1DTA) mice, Cre-estrogen receptor (CreER) expression is driven by the endogenous Prox1 promoter and, in presence of tamoxifen, removes a stop codon in the Rosa26(DTA/+) allele and induces diphtheria toxin fragment A (DTA) expression. DTA produces cell-autonomous apoptosis. Prox1DTA mice injected with tamoxifen at postnatal days 0 (P0) and P1 show significant DC and outer PC loss at P2-P4, that reaches ∼70% by 1 month. Outer HC loss follows at P14 and is almost complete at 1 month, while inner HCs remain intact. Neural innervation to the outer HCs is disrupted in Prox1DTA mice and auditory brainstem response thresholds in adults are 40-50 dB higher than in controls. The hearing deficit correlates with loss of cochlear amplification. Remarkably, in Prox1DTA mice, the auditory epithelium preserves the ability to seal the reticular lamina and spiral ganglion neuron counts are normal, a key requirement for cochlear implant success. In addition, our results show that cochlear SC pools should be appropriately replenished during HC regeneration strategies.
    Journal of Neuroscience 01/2013; 33(4):1564-76. · 6.91 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In evaluating strategies to preserve or regenerate the cochlea, understanding the process of labyrinthine injury on a cellular and molecular level is crucial. Examination of inner ear injury reveals mechanism-specific types of damage, often at specific areas within the cochlea. Site-specific interventions can then be considered. The review will briefly summarize the historical perspective of advancements in hearing science through 2006. Areas of research covered include hair cell protection, hair cell regeneration, spiral ganglion cell regeneration, and stria vascularis metabolic regulation. The review will briefly summarize the early development of a few such site-specific interventions for inner ear functional rehabilitation, for work done prior to 2006. The outstanding reviews of cutting edge research from this year's and last year's Hearing Science section of Current Opinion in Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery can then be understood and appreciated in a more informed manner.
    Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery 08/2009; 17(5):363-72.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Therapies aimed at the protection and/or regeneration of inner ear hair cells are of great interest, given the significant monetary and quality of life impact of balance disorders. Different viral vectors have been shown to transfect various cell types in the inner ear. The past decade has provided tremendous advances in the use of adenoviral vectors to achieve targeted treatment delivery. Several routes of delivery have been identified to introduce vectors into the inner ear while minimizing injury to surrounding structures. Recently, the transcription factor Atoh1 was determined to play a critical role in hair cell differentiation. Adenoviral-mediated overexpression of Atoh1 in culture and in vivo has demonstrated the ability to regenerate vestibular hair cells by causing transdifferentiation of neighbouring epithelial-supporting cells. Functional recovery of the vestibular system has also been documented following adenoviral-induced Atoh1 overexpression. Experiments demonstrating gene transfer in human vestibular epithelial cells reveal that the human inner ear is a suitable target for gene therapy.
    Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 02/2012; 16(9):1970-7. · 4.75 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from