Article

Past and present physical activity and endometrial cancer risk.

Environmental Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
British Journal of Cancer (Impact Factor: 4.82). 10/1993; 68(3):584-9. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1993.390
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We examined the relation between physical activity and endometrial cancer using data from a multicentre case-control study involving 405 endometrial cancer cases and 297 population controls. Estimates of recreational (i.e. active sport, walks and hikes) and nonrecreational activity (i.e. house cleaning, climbing stairs and walking or standing on the job) were obtained using interview information. After adjustment for age, study area, education, parity, years of use of oral contraceptives, years of use of menopausal oestrogens and cigarette smoking, recent recreational inactivity was associated with increased risk (RR = 1.9 for lowest vs highest tertile). Similarly, recent nonrecreational inactivity was associated with increased risk (RR = 2.2 for lowest vs highest tertile). Further adjustment for body mass and nonrecreational activity attenuated the association between risk and recent recreational inactivity (RR = 1.2; 95% CL = 0.7-2.0) but adjustment for body mass and recreational activity did not alter the association between risk and recent nonrecreational inactivity (RR = 2.0; 95% CL = 1.2-3.1). To evaluate the relation between risk and sustained inactivity, we simultaneously examined activity levels at three periods (RR i.e. age 20-29, age 30-39 and recently) in women age 50 and older. After adjustment for potential confounders and body mass, risk was elevated among women who were always recreationally inactive (RR = 1.5 for always active vs always inactive) and among women who were always nonrecreationally inactive (RR = 1.6 for always active vs always inactive). This study suggests that physically inactive women may be at increased risk of endometrial cancer because they are more likely to be overweight or obese. Our data also suggest that inactivity per se may be associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that our results, particularly those for nonrecreational activity, reflect unmeasured confounding factors. Future studies should attempt to obtain more detailed assessments of physical activity, including the intensity with which an individual engaged in an activity and the actual time involved in exertion.

Full-text

Available from: Leo B Twiggs, May 27, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
62 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While considerable evidence suggests that leisure-time physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of endometrial cancer(EC), the shape of dose-response relationship has not been investigated and previous meta-analyses have not accounted for differences in measures of physical activity. To address such issues, we conducted linear and non-linear dose-response meta-analyses by metabolic equivalent of task (MET)-hour/week and hour/week, respectively, based on observational studies published up to August 2013 identified from PubMed and Embase databases. Summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. In the linear dose-response analysis, an increase in leisure-time physical activity by 3 MET-hour/week was associated with an approximately 2% reduced risk of EC (summary RR=0.98, P=0.02, 95% CI=0.95-1.00, I(2) =53%, Pheterogeneity =0.06, three case-control studies and three cohort studies, 3,460 cases, range of activity=0-50 MET-hour/week) and increase by an hour/week was associated with an approximately 5% reduced risk of EC (summary RR=0.95, P<0.001, 95% CI=0.93-0.98, I(2) =31%, Pheterogeneity =0.20, four case-control studies and two cohort studies, 3,314 cases, range of activity=0-15 hour/week). Non-linear dose-response meta-analysis suggested that the curve may plateau at 10 MET-hour/week (Pchange in slope =0.04) but this statistical significance was sensitive to one study. No evidence of a nonlinear association was indicated by hour/week (Pchange in slope >0.69). In conclusion, an increase in leisure-time physical activity may continue to decrease EC risk, within the range of 0-50 MET-hour/week or 0-15 hour/week. Future studies should evaluate possible independent role of intensity of physical activity and effect modification by obesity. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    International Journal of Cancer 08/2014; 135(3). DOI:10.1002/ijc.28687 · 5.01 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background:Physical activity may be associated with decreasing endometrial cancer risk; it remains unclear whether the association is modified by body size.Methods:Among 93 888 eligible California Teachers Study participants, 976 were diagnosed with incident endometrial cancer between 1995-1996 and 2007. Cox proportional hazards regression methods were used to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for endometrial cancer associated with long-term (high school through age 54 years) and baseline (3 years prior to joining the cohort) strenuous and moderate recreational physical activity, overall and by body size.Results:Increased baseline strenuous recreational physical activity was associated with decreased endometrial cancer risk (Ptrend=0.006) with approximately 25% lower risk among women exercising >3 h per week per year than among those exercising <1/2 h per week per year (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.92). This inverse association was observed among overweight/obese women (body mass index ≥25 kg m(-2); Ptrend=0.006), but not among thinner women (Ptrend=0.12). Baseline moderate activity was associated with lower risk among overweight/obese women.Conclusion:Increasing physical activity, particularly strenuous activity, may be a lifestyle change that overweight and obese women can implement to reduce their endometrial cancer risk.British Journal of Cancer advance online publication 16 July 2013; doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.61 www.bjcancer.com.
    British Journal of Cancer 07/2013; 109(3). DOI:10.1038/bjc.2013.61 · 4.82 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States, accounting for 1 in 4 deaths annually. It has been estimated that one third of all cancer deaths are related to overweight/ obesity, physical inactivity, and poor diet. Epidemiological studies have shown that regular physical activity reduces the risk for some types of cancer as well as postdiagnosis mortality. In studies examining the relation between regular physical activity and the risk of breast cancer, women who were the most physically active reduced their risk by at least 20%. Higher levels of recreational physical activity especially demonstrated greater risk reduction. Meta-analyses suggest that greater physical activity, especially leisure-time physical activity, may reduce the risk of colon cancer by 20% or more in men and women. Physical activity did not demonstrate an association with the risk for cancer of the rectum in either gender. Most studies report an inverse relation between physical activity level and risk for endometrial cancer. Although the estimates of risk reduction vary greatly across studies, the average reported risk reduction was about 30%. The benefit of regular physical activity in the prevention of prostate cancer is not as clear as with other types of cancer. There is some evidence, however, that physical activity may be protective of the more aggressive forms of the disease. Further research is needed to better quantify the specific components of physical activity required to reduce the risk for different cancers.
    American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 09/2009; 3(5):353-361. DOI:10.1177/1559827609338680