A randomized trial of psychiatric day treatment for patients with affective and personality disorders.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Hospital & community psychiatry 09/1993; 44(8):757-63. DOI: 10.1176/ps.44.8.757
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The outcome of a day treatment program for psychiatric outpatients with affective and personality disorders was evaluated. The program was dynamically oriented, intensive, group focused, and time limited (18 weeks).
The prospective trial used a randomized treatment-versus-control (delayed-treatment) design to examine 17 outcome variables covering five areas: interpersonal functioning, symptomatology, self-esteem, life satisfaction, and defensive functioning. Those variables, plus individualized treatment objectives, were monitored before and after the treatment and control periods and at follow-up an average of eight months later.
Treated patients showed significantly better outcome than control patients for seven of the 17 outcome variables: social dysfunction, family dysfunction, interpersonal behavior, mood level, life satisfaction, self-esteem, and severity of disturbance associated with individual goals of treatment as rated by an independent assessor. The findings could not be accounted for by diagnosis or use of medication. Benefits were maintained over the follow-up period. The average treatment-versus-control effect size for all 17 variables was .71.
The study supports the efficacy of an intensive day treatment program for patients who manifest significant difficulties associated with affective and personality disorders.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introducción: En los últimos 25 años varios estudios han mostrado la eficacia de diversas intervenciones psicológicas para los trastornos graves de la personalidad. Sin embargo, la generalización de estos resultados positivos desde entornos con larga tradición investigadora a condiciones de practica habitual ha sido cuestionada, reclamándose la replicación en estudios pragmáticos. Métodos: Este estudio pragmático compara las hospitalizaciones y las visitas a urgencias antes y durante un programa terapéutico de 6 meses para trastornos graves de la personalidad y 36 meses después del inicio. El programa terapéutico, que integra varias intervenciones específicas en un encuadre coherente, se realizó en un entorno de práctica habitual. Se incluyeron 51 pacientes evaluados de acuerdo a criterios DSM-IV por medio de la versión española de la Entrevista Clínica Estructurada para trastornos de la personalidad (SCID II). Resultados: Las características clínicas evidenciaron un grupo de pacientes muy graves, de los que el 78,4% cumplía criterios de trastorno límite de la personalidad. El porcentaje de pacientes hospitalizados y que visitaron urgencias así como el número de días de hospitalización y de visitas a urgencias se redujo significativamente durante el tratamiento y esta mejoría se mantuvo en el tiempo. Conclusiones: Un tratamiento integrado para trastornos graves de la personalidad puede ser efectivo para reducir las re-admisiones o las estancias hospitalarias prolongadas cuando es implementado por clínicos en condiciones de práctica habitual.
  • Source
    X Congreso de la FAPE, Chiclana, Cadíz,1997; 01/1997
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Over the past 25 years, several studies have shown the efficacy of a number of psychological interventions for severe personality disorders. However, the generalizability of these positive results from long tradition research settings to more ordinary ones has been questioned, requiring a need for replication in pragmatic studies. Method: This pragmatic study compares hospitalizations and emergency room visits before and during a six-month therapeutic program for severe personality disorders and 36 months after starting it. The therapeutic program, which integrates several specific interventions within a coherent framework, was carried out in an ordinary clinical setting. Fifty-one patients evaluated according DSM-IV criteria by using the Spanish version of the Structured Clinical Interview for personality disorders (SCID II) were included. Results: The clinical characteristics showed a group of severely disturbed patients, of which 78.4% met criteria for borderline personality disorder. The percentage of patients hospitalized and visiting the emergency room as well as the number of days of hospitalization and emergency room visits was significantly reduced during the treatment and this improvement was maintained throughout. Conclusions: An integrated treatment for severe personality disorders could be effective in preventing reliance on readmissions or prolonged hospital stays when it is implemented by clinicians in ordinary clinical settings.