Trauma to the upper thoracic spine: anatomy, biomechanics, and unique imaging features.

Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242.
American Journal of Roentgenology (Impact Factor: 2.74). 02/1993; 160(1):95-102.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This review summarizes the anatomic and biomechanical features of the thoracic spine, which are different from those of the more mobile segments of the spine, and emphasizes their role in trauma. The distinguishing characteristics of the thoracic spine are the presence of the ribs and their articulations. The rib cage restricts motion and adds stiffness to the spine. During trauma, it provides the thoracic spine with additional strength and energy-absorbing capacity. Above the T10 level, most injuries produce a basic pattern consisting of an anterior fracture-dislocation involving two contiguous vertebrae, often with associated neurologic impairment. The definition of spinal instability remains controversial. CT is the imaging technique of choice for evaluation of spine fractures; however, MR imaging is superior in the evaluation of spinal cord injury and posttraumatic disk herniation. MR imaging also provides prognostic information not obtainable with other imaging methods.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Child protection systems appear to be in a continual crisis of confidence. They get criticised for not doing enough to protect some children, whilst at the same time being criticised for being too intrusive or not managing demand. This constant balancing act drives almost continual reforms, none of which appear to reduce further crises of confidence. The central issue facing tertiary child protection systems stems from their function as makers of sometimes highly uncertain risk screening decisions. Uncertainty leads to errors; false positives and false negatives. Two recurring issues challenging child protection agencies are concerns about these errors. Fears about doing too much are concerns about false positives and fears of doing too little are concerns about false negatives. The need to address both issues within the context of uncertain high stakes decision making, in a highly risk intolerant environment leads to poorly formed sentinel event driven policy that in turn leads to organisational fragility. A decision outcome-based performance model based on Signal Detection Theory provides indicators that explicitly outline the link between these two strategic issues facing child protection systems. This has improved dialogue, understanding and support from sponsors. It has led an informed focus on improving decision making and stabilisation of decision thresholds. It demonstrates that Child protection systems are in fact very responsive and do perform well in their decision making (risk screening) function. Social work decision makers provide value in their decision making in spite of highly uncertain decisions to make. Child protection systems do not need reform, they need to be “reframed” to better understand true performance and so avoid poorly informed reactive policy responses to the genuine challenges that they face.
    Children and Youth Services Review - CHILD YOUTH SERV REV. 01/2011; 33(11):2076-2086.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traumatic injuries of the spine are defined as with or without spinal cord injuries, depending on neurological involvement. They are also classified as stable or unstable, depending on the involvement of the capsulo-ligamentary elements and posterior joints by the traumatic event. Judgement about the stability or instability of a vertebral fracture is performed through radiographic images, CT and/or MRI. Currently MRI is considered the gold standard for the analysis of the cord and discs, nerves and ligaments. MRI is also the examination of choice in the diagnosis, classification and dating (possibly supplemented by X-ray examination and CT) of dorso-lumbar fractures. In particular, in emergency MRI is essential for the assessment of damage to the cord and subsequent planning of the surgical strategy.
    Archivio di Ortopedia e Reumatologia 10/2011; 122(2).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diagnostic imaging has a fundamental role in the identification and characterization of vertebral fractures. Conventional radiography is the first level method; however, it has reduced sensitivity. Therefore, it is often necessary to resort to second level imaging using CT and/or MRI. Next-generation CT is the best method for assessing bone. MRI has the unique ability to identify bone marrow edema and diffuse infiltrative disease. The bone scan, in relation to its low cost, high panoramic views and easy accessibility, retains an important role in the imaging of vertebral fractures.
    Archivio di Ortopedia e Reumatologia 10/2011; 122(2).


Available from