Article

A National Cancer Institute sponsored screening trial for prostatic, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancers.

National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Cancer (Impact Factor: 4.9). 01/2010; 71(2 Suppl):589-93. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.2820710215
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND. Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cause of cancer-related death in American women. The median age at diagnosis is about 62 years; incidence rises rapidly after age 60. Pelvic examination has been the primary method for detection of ovarian carcinoma. It is insensitive for the detection of early disease, however: most women present with disease beyond the pelvis (Stages III and IV) and are not curable with existing techniques. Two new technologies may be useful as screening tools for earlier detection of ovarian cancer. CA 125 is an antigenic determinant expressed on an ovarian cancer cell line. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) images the ovaries from within the vagina and can be performed by a technician in about 10 minutes. In small preoperative studies of women with ovarian masses, serum CA 125 levels have been elevated (typically above 35 U/ml) in over two-thirds of cases and in up to 50% of Stage I cases. The test is not absolutely specific: elevations have been reported with pregnancy, endometriosis, menstruation, benign ovarian tumors, and with cancers of the breast, colon, pancreas, lung, stomach, and liver. Nevertheless, the specificity of CA 125 in postmenopausal women has been reported at about 95% or more. TVUS provides higher resolving power for ovarian abnormalities than transabdominal ultrasound or physical examination; however, experience with it is limited. CA 125 and TVUS may be complementary. CONCLUSIONS. For these reasons, the National Cancer Institute is planning a randomized trial of all three tests versus routine medical care in women of ages 60-74 years. This is part of a larger trial to determine the efficacy of screening for lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancers in women, and for lung, colorectal, and prostatic cancers in men. Seventy-four thousand women will be randomized in the study.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: John K Gohagan, Oct 06, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
67 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the cytokeratin marker CYFRA 21-1 as a screening marker for ovarian cancer, as a predictive marker in patients with adnexal masses and as a prognostic marker in women suffering from ovarian cancer. In order to determine the specificity of the CYFRA 21-1 test, we have investigated CYFRA 21-1 serum levels in several benign conditions. This retrospective study comprises 37 patients suffering from ovarian cancer FIGO stages Ia-III. Sera from patients with benign ovarian cysts, endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, inflammatory bowel disease and liver cirrhosis were evaluated in 90, 10, 38, 10 and 20 cases respectively. With a sensitivity of 41% and a specificity of 95%, CYFRA 21-1 was not suitable as a screening marker for ovarian cancer. Although CYFRA 21-1 was able to discriminate between ovarian cancer and benign adnexal tumours (univariate regression model, P = 0.0001), CYFRA 21-1 did not reveal additional information to CA 125 in a multivariate regression analysis (P = 0.06). CYFRA 21-1 serum levels were elevated in benign conditions such as liver cirrhosis, but not in endometriosis and inflammatory diseases. In ovarian cancer patients, elevated CYFRA 21-1 serum levels before therapy were associated with a poor overall and disease-free survival (log-rank test, P = 0.02 and log-rank test, P = 0.005 respectively). CYFRA 21-1, while obviously not suitable for screening or differential diagnosis of adnexal masses, could be useful as an additional prognostic factor in ovarian cancer patients.
    British Journal of Cancer 11/1998; 78(8):1108-12. DOI:10.1038/bjc.1998.636 · 4.82 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The recent rapid development of high-throughput technology enables the study of molecular signatures for cancer diagnosis and prognosis at multiple levels, from genomic and epigenomic to transcriptomic. These unbiased large-scale scans provide important insights into the detection of cancer-related signatures. In addition to single-layer signatures, such as gene expression and somatic mutations, integrating data from multiple heterogeneous platforms using a systematic approach has been proven to be particularly effective for the identification of classification markers. This approach not only helps to uncover essential driver genes and pathways in the cancer network that are responsible for the mechanisms of cancer development, but will also lead us closer to the ultimate goal of personalized cancer therapy.
    10/2014; 1(2):e957981. DOI:10.4161/23723548.2014.957981
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Large randomized trials provide the only valid means of quantifying the benefits and drawbacks of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, but the follow-up of ongoing studies is still too short to allow evaluation of mortality. We report here the intermediate indicators of screening efficacy from the second round of the Finnish trial. The Finnish trial, with approximately 80,000 men in the target population, is the largest component in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. The first round was completed in 1996-1999. Each year 8,000 men 55-67 years of age were randomly assigned to the screening arm, and the rest formed the control arm. Men randomized to the screening arm in 1996 were reinvited 4 years later, in 2000, and PSA was determined. Of the eligible 6415 men, 4407 (69%) eventually participated in the second round of screening. Of the first-round participants, up to 84% (3833 of 4556) attended rescreening. A total of 461 screenees (10.5%) had PSA levels of > or = 4 microg/liter. Altogether, 97 cancers were found, yielding an overall detection rate of 2.2% (97 of 4407). Seventy-nine cases were found among the 3833 second-time screenees (detection rate 2.1%) and 18 in those 574 men (3.1%) who had not participated previously. A PSA of > or = 4 microg/liter, but negative biopsy in the first screening round was associated with an up to 9-fold risk of cancer in rescreening relative to those with lower PSA levels at baseline. Ninety-one (94%) of all of the detected cancers were clinically localized. As surrogate measures of an effective screening program, both compliance as well as the overall and advanced prostate cancer detection rates remained acceptable. Men defined as screen-positive but with a negative confirmation of cancer at prevalence screen formed a high-risk group at rescreening.
    Clinical Cancer Research 04/2004; 10(7):2231-6. DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0338 · 8.19 Impact Factor