Excessive fibrosis of supraclavicular lymph-node granulomas in a patient with progressive systemic sclerosis
Department of Medicine, Patras University School of Medicine, Greece.Rheumatology International (Impact Factor: 1.52). 02/1993; 12(6):255-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00301013
The case of a 29-year-old white female with a 7-year history of typical scleroderma is presented who developed excessive fibrosis of the supraclavicular lymph nodes. After 3 years of disease, firm right supraclavicular lymphadenopathy appeared, accompanied by a high fever. Biopsy revealed non-caseating granulomas and short-term antituberculous therapy was ineffective. The symptoms finally responded to steroids, but adenopathy persisted. A second biopsy, 40 days after the first, disclosed a similar picture with some degree of fibrosis of the granulomas. Four years later, with stony hard right supraclavicular adenopathy persisting, a third biopsy showed excessive fibrosis of the granulomas within the node and destruction of its architecture. It is postulated that the primary disease of this patient might be responsible for this clinical picture. The present seems to be the first report of such a case in the literature.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Malignancies from many primary sites may metastasize to supraclavicular lymph nodes (SCLN). We reviewed 100 fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) of SCLNs. There were three major types of malignancy detected by this method: adenocarcinoma (n = 40), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 14), and other malignancies (n = 29). Adenocarcinomas and other malignancies from all sites tended to metastasize to the left SCLN. Squamous cell carcinomas from all sites, however, tended to appear on the right side. For 61 patients, a previous diagnosis of malignancy had been made within 1 yr of the clinical appearance of the abnormal SCLN. For 20 patients, the primary diagnosis antedated SCLN metastasis by more than 1 yr, particularly patients with adenocarcinoma of the breast, prostate, or thyroid papillary carcinoma.Diagnostic Cytopathology 04/1996; 14(3):216-20. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199604)14:3<216::AID-DC4>3.0.CO;2-F · 1.12 Impact Factor
- Rheumatology 09/2003; 42(8):1007-9. DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keg245 · 4.48 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.