Affect, Cognition, and Awareness: Affective Priming With Optimal and Suboptimal Stimulus Exposures

Annenberg School of Communication, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90089-0281.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Impact Factor: 5.08). 06/1993; 64(5):723-39. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.64.5.723
Source: PubMed


The affective primacy hypothesis (R. B. Zajonc, 1980) asserts that positive and negative affective reactions can be evoked with minimal stimulus input and virtually no cognitive processing. The present work tested this hypothesis by comparing the effects of affective and cognitive priming under extremely brief (suboptimal) and longer (optimal) exposure durations. At suboptimal exposures only affective primes produced significant shifts in Ss' judgments of novel stimuli. These results suggest that when affect is elicited outside of conscious awareness, it is diffuse and nonspecific, and its origin and address are not accessible. Having minimal cognitive participation, such gross and nonspecific affective reactions can therefore be diffused or displaced onto unrelated stimuli. At optimal exposures this pattern of results was reversed such that only cognitive primes produced significant shifts in judgments. Together, these results support the affective primacy hypothesis.

Download full-text


Available from: Sheila T Murphy,

Click to see the full-text of:

Article: Affect, Cognition, and Awareness: Affective Priming With Optimal and Suboptimal Stimulus Exposures

0 B

See full-text
  • Source
    • "ms, SD = 90 ms) and Choice did not interact with prior outcomes (F's b 1.76, p's N .196). Consistent with a large body of evidence demonstrating that negative affective experiences lead to faster behavioural responses (Hermans et al., 2001; Murphy and Zajonc, 1993; Ohman et al., 2001), we found RTs were facilitated by prior loss outcomes. This effect was observed in Outcome t-2 (F [1] [26] = 6.12, p = .02, "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Substantial evidence indicates that decision outcomes are typically evaluated relative to expectations learned from relatively long sequences of previous outcomes. This mechanism is thought to play a key role in general learning and adaptation processes but relatively little is known about the determinants of outcome evaluation when the capacity to learn from series of prior events is difficult or impossible. To investigate this issue, we examined how the feedback related negativity (FRN) is modulated by information briefly presented before outcome evaluation. The FRN is a brain potential time-locked to the delivery of feedback and it is widely thought to be sensitive to prior expectations. We conducted a multi-trial gambling task in which outcomes at each trial were fully randomised to minimise the capacity to learn from long sequences of prior outcomes. Event-related potentials for outcomes (Win/Loss) in the current trial (Outcomet) were separated according to the type of outcomes that occurred in the preceding two trials (Outcomet-1 and Outcomet-2). We found that FRN voltage was more positive during the processing of win feedback when it was preceded by wins at Outcomet-1 compared to win feedback preceded by losses at Outcomet-1. However, no influence of preceding outcomes was found on FRN activity relative to the processing of loss feedback. We also found no effects of Outcomet-2 on FRN amplitude relative to current feedback. Additional analyses indicated that this effect was largest for trials in which participants selected a decision different to the gamble chosen in the previous trial. These findings are inconsistent with models that solely relate the FRN to prediction error computation. Instead, our results suggest that if stable predictions about future events are weak or non-existent, then outcome processing can be determined by affective systems. More specifically, our results indicate that the FRN is likely to reflect the activity of positive affective systems in these contexts. Importantly, our findings indicate that a multifactorial explanation of the nature of the FRN is necessary and such an account must incorporate affective and motivational factors in outcome processing.
    NeuroImage 10/2015; 125. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.046 · 6.36 Impact Factor
    • "Studies 1 and 2 provided experimental evidence that exposure to subliminal sexual cues results in greater positive affect. In Study 1, we measured changes in self-reported affect and, in Study 2, we examined liking of neutral images via the affective priming paradigm (Murphy & Zajonc, 1993). In Study 3, we wanted to go beyond the effects revealed in Study 1 and 2, and rather than measuring general positivity or positive affect, we focused on assessing positivity specifically related to sex. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sexual arousal is thought to be the result of the processing of sexual cues at two levels: conscious and unconscious. Whereas numerous studies have examined the affective and motivational responses to supraliminal (consciously processed) sexual cues, much less is known regarding the responses to subliminal (processed outside of one's awareness) sexual cues. Five studies examined responses to subliminal sexual cues. Studies 1-3 demonstrated increases in adult's positive affect following exposure to subliminal sexual cues compared to control cues. Study 4 demonstrated that the positive affect resulting from exposure to subliminal sexual cues increased motivation to further engage in a neutral task. Study 5 provided evidence suggesting that the affect and motivation found in Studies 1-4 were associated with motivation to engage in sex specifically, rather than a general approach motivation. The implications of these findings for the processing of subliminal sexual cues and for human sexuality are discussed.
    Archives of Sexual Behavior 10/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10508-015-0609-y · 3.53 Impact Factor
Show more