Evaluation of resident performance in an outpatient internal medicine clinic using standardized patients

Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison 53792.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.45). 05/1993; 8(4):193-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF02599266
Source: PubMed


To observe and evaluate the performance of primary care internal medicine residents within the outpatient clinic milieu.
Longitudinal descriptive study.
48 internal medicine resident encounters with two standardized patients at the University of Wisconsin General Internal Medicine Clinics.
Residents were rated by the standardized patients with a medical skills checklist and an interpersonal skills checklist, and by the staffing physician with a clinical reasoning skills checklist. The investigators reviewed audiotapes of the standardized patient encounters for strategic management skills.
Resident performance on these scales was examined for improvement with years of training; when considered separately, no such effect was seen for either standardized patient case. When the cases were grouped together, however, there was significant improvement on the Clinical Reasoning Instrument. The grouped standardized patient data were compared with data from inpatient faculty evaluations of the residents. Faculty evaluations correlated with standardized patient evaluations of resident performance only on the medical checklist. Finally, comparison of the four assessment scales demonstrated a significant correlation between interpersonal skills, as assessed by the patient, and strategic management skills.
Resident outpatient performance, measured in a blinded setting, does not improve with year of training. Faculty inpatient assessments of residents correlate with medical "thoroughness" as measured by a medical skills checklist, and interpersonal skills as rated by standardized patients correlate with resident use of strategic medical management.

Download full-text


Available from: Mariana Hewson,
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A formative assessment of the effects of perspective-taking on the interaction of physician assistant students with standardized patients in a performance based exam

  • Academic Medicine 11/1994; 69(10 Suppl):S45-7. DOI:10.1097/00001888-199410000-00038 · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A thematic review was conducted of the 1980-1994 research literature on teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings for both undergraduate and graduate medical education. Included in the review were 101 data-based research articles, along with other articles containing helpful recommendations for improving ambulatory education. The studies suggest that education in ambulatory care clinics is characterized by variability, unpredictability, immediacy, and lack of continuity. Learners often see a narrow range of patient problems in a single clinic and experience limited continuity of care. Few cases are discussed with attending physicians and even fewer are examined by them. Case discussions are short in duration, involve little teaching, and provide virtually no feedback. Excellent teachers are described as physician role models, effective supervisors, dynamic teachers, and supportive persons. Rather than block rotations, students and residents prefer longitudinal teaching programs, which offer continuity-of-care experiences with patients and preceptors. Although little can be concluded about learning outcomes, the studies indicate that some medical students and residents have deficient skills in interviewing, physical examination, and management of psychosocial issues. Based on the reviewed studies, the author recommends facilitating learning by increasing continuity-of-patient-care experiences and contact with faculty members, encouraging collaborative and self-directed learning, providing faculty development, and strengthening assessment and feedback procedures. The author also recommends further research to learn about medical specialties other than internal medicine and family medicine, to describe the knowledge and reasoning of both teachers and learners, and to assess the influences of various educational programs on learning and satisfaction.
    Academic Medicine 11/1995; 70(10):898-931. DOI:10.1097/00001888-199510000-00014 · 2.93 Impact Factor
Show more