Article

Cancer in offspring of parents engaged in agricultural activities in Norway: incidence and risk factors in the farm environment.

National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.
International Journal of Cancer (Impact Factor: 5.01). 02/1996; 65(1):39-50.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In this study of cancer in offspring we demonstrate that factors linked to horticulture and use of pesticides are associated with cancer at an early age, whereas factors in animal husbandry, in particular poultry farming, are associated with cancers in later childhood and young adulthood. Incident cancer was investigated in offspring born in 1952-1991 to parents identified as farm holders in agricultural censuses in Norway in 1969-1989. In the follow-up of 323,292 offspring for 5.7 million person-years, 1,275 incident cancers were identified in the Cancer Registry for 1965-1991. The standardized incidence for all cancers was equal to the total rural population of Norway, but cohort subjects had an excess incidence of nervous-system tumours and testicular cancers in certain regions and strata of time that could imply that specific risk factors were of importance. Classification of exposure indicators was based on information given at the agricultural censuses. Risk factors were found for brain tumours, in particular non-astrocytic neuroepithelial tumours: for all ages, pig farming tripled the risk [rate ratio (RR), 3.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.89-5.13]; indicators of pesticide use had an independent effect of the same magnitude in a dose-response fashion, strongest in children aged 0 to 14 years (RR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.63-6.94). Horticulture and pesticide indicators were associated with all cancers at ages 0 to 4 years, Wilms' tumour, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, eye cancer and neuroblastoma. Chicken farming was associated with some common cancers of adolescence, and was strongest for osteosarcoma and mixed cellular type of Hodgkin's disease. The main problem in this large cohort study is the crude exposure indicators available; the resulting misclassification is likely to bias any true association towards unity.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
70 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RESUMEN Se exponen brevemente algunos factores medioambientales capaces de convertirse en elementos cancerígenos para el hombre, entre ellos el tabaco, el alcohol y ciertos tipos de alimentos, así como también determinados tóxicos industriales y el estrés como mecanismo psi-cológico, que pueden modificar la vigilancia inmunológica y favore-cer la aparición y desarrollo acelerado del cáncer, al actuar sobre los linfocitos y las interleucinas. Estos aspectos deben servir para ga-rantizar una eficiente promoción de salud, encaminada a prevenir tan terrible enfermedad. Palabras clave: CARCINÓGENOS AMBIENTALES; PROMOTORES DE TUMOR; ONCÓGENOS; VIGILANCIA INMUNOLÓGICA; SUSTANCIAS NOCIVAS. =================== INTRODUCCIÓN El cáncer es un padecimiento tan temido como antiguo, 1 que continúa siendo hoy, en los albores del siglo XXI, una incógnita para el hombre. La ciencia ha dedicado innumerables esfuerzos para esclarecer la verdadera gé-nesis de este proceso, y aunque a través de los años se ha avanzado en su estudio, no ha sido con la rapidez y dinámica que pre-cisa. El primer intento para explicar las cau-sas de la enfermedad se sustentó en la gran incidencia de cáncer de pulmón en fumado-res, así como en la asociación de la neopla-sia maligna de vejiga con componentes de las pinturas; es decir, se insistió funda-mentalmente en los factores externos como desencadenantes de la afección. 2, 3 Con el proceso de la genética se co-menzó a ampliar el horizonte investigativo y se descubrió la existencia de oncogenes en el genoma de células tumorales, por lo cual se pensó lógicamente: "el enemigo está dentro de uno mismo", y durante mu-cho tiempo el hombre se sintió aún más temeroso, pues cualquiera podía hallarse marcado irremediablemente por sus propios genes para padecer el mal. 2, 4 Afortunadamente ya se conoce mucho más sobre los agentes que condicionan la aparición del cáncer, aunque todavía no al-canza la expectativa deseada: el problema estriba en la combinación de factores del medio externo, que influyen sobre los on-cogenes y alteran la secuencia de creci-miento y desarrollo de las células. 3 -6 Con este descubrimiento, el hombre ha empezado a ganar la batalla contra el cán-cer (la influencia de la polución, los pro-ductos enlatados y el estrés, entre otros, pueden ser perfectamente controlados) y su conocimiento ayudará a evitar uno de los peores sufrimientos del ser humano. En este trabajo nos propusimos mencio-nar algunos elementos carcinogénicos pre-viamente conocidos y otros de más reciente hallazgo, con el fin de hacer un modesto aporte a la lucha mundial contra esta do-lencia.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The contribution of occupational exposures to rare cancers, which represent 22% of all cancers diagnosed annually in Europe, remains insufficiently considered. We conducted a comprehensive review of occupational risk factors in 67 rare cancers (annual incidence <6/100,000). An examination of relevant articles in PubMed (1960–2012) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) monographs revealed that 26 cancer sites, such as mesothelioma, nasal, larynx, liver, ovarian cancer, bone sarcoma, and hematopoietic malignancies were consistently linked to occupational factors. Main exposures included asbestos, wood dust, metals/metalloids, formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, and radiation. There was inconsistent evidence regarding 22 rare malignancies. We did not identify relevant data for 19 rare cancers. Despite limitations of published evidence, our review provides useful information that can facilitate the identification of work-related factors that contribute to rare cancers. International collaborations, development of improved exposure assessment methods, and molecular approaches can improve future studies.
    Critical reviews in oncology/hematology 01/2013; · 5.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Literature on maternal exposures and the risk of epigenetic changes or diseases in the offspring is growing. Paternal contributions are often not considered. However, some animal and epidemiologic studies on various contaminants, nutrition, and lifestyle-related conditions suggest a paternal influence on the offspring's future health. The phenotypic outcomes may have been attributed to DNA damage or mutations, but increasing evidence shows that the inheritance of environmentally induced functional changes of the genome, and related disorders, are (also) driven by epigenetic components. In this essay we suggest the existence of epigenetic windows of susceptibility to environmental insults during sperm development. Changes in DNA methylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNAs are viable mechanistic candidates for a non-genetic transfer of paternal environmental information, from maturing germ cell to zygote. Inclusion of paternal factors in future research will ultimately improve the understanding of transgenerational epigenetic plasticity and health-related effects in future generations.
    BioEssays 01/2014; · 4.84 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
9 Downloads
Available from
Sep 17, 2014