[Effect of treated genital cancer on sexual functions of the woman].
Institut für Sexuologie und Studium der Fertilität, 1. Med. Fak., Karls-Universität, Prag.Zentralblatt für Gynäkologie 02/1996; 118(1):9-17.
By means of a structured interview and four questionnaires (Heterosexual development of woman, Sexual activity of woman, Sexual function of woman and Questionnaire N5 which evaluates the presence and intensity of neurotic symptoms) the authors examined 163 women following treatment of a malignant tumor of the genitalia. The examination was made during balneological therapy in a spa. Their age varied between 20 and 63 years. The feeling of female inferiority was recorded roughly in every eighth proband. Deterioration of sexual function of varying extent affected every second patient. Changes in emotional relations between couples (partners) were more favourable than in sexual life. Emotional and sexual relations improvement was recorded in every fifth and eleventh woman compared with the state before the illness. Husbands or partners of the patients had great understanding and were very tolerant. In the author's opinion it is a pleasant surprise that one quarter of the patients perceived the associated stress only as medium or even small stress. A general change (deterioration) of sexual intercourse correlated directly with subjectively perceived stress. The investigation revealed also that women treated on account of malignant tumors of the genitalia on the territory of former Czechoslovakia have practically no contacts with specialists in sexual rehabilitation.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this paper is to summarize the empirical findings related to the assessment and treatment of sexual difficulties commonly experienced by gynecological cancer survivors and to make suggestions for future research and practice in this area. First, we describe the sexual problems that are most frequently reported by gynecological cancer patients and some of their common medical and psychological correlates. These include pain, premature ovarian failure, changes in vaginal anatomy, emotional distress, body image, and sexual self-concept. The complex interaction of physiological and psychological variables plays an important role in the development of sexual dysfunction in this patient population. Furthermore, we review the empirical studies that have examined the effects of sexual rehabilitation therapy on the sexual functioning of gynecological cancer survivors and provide relevant research and clinical recommendations. We also discuss reasons to involve patients' sexual partners in psychosocial oncology research, given the complex interplay between patients' and partners' psychosexual issues.Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings 05/2001; 8(2):73-84. DOI:10.1023/A:1009500425625 · 1.49 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Cancer can cause multiple impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions. According to individual case findings and needs, rehabilitation treatment is varied. The review mainly focuses on specific problems. Because of functional deficits cancer patients suffer from persistent emotional and social distress and a reduced quality of life (QOL). QOL encompasses at least the four dimensions of physical, emotional, social and cognitive function, which may be positively influenced by physical exercise. Physical exercise also has been shown to prevent or minimise inactivity/ disuse problems and to reduce fatigue. The management of sexuality dysfunction has to begin with a thorough history taking and a consequent sexuality counselling. The goals of rehabilitation procedures under palliative care are not only to control physical pain but also to help with mental, social and spiritual pain, together with other symptoms. Rehabilitation problems in head and neck cancer, sexuality, lung cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer and lymphedema can be improved by rehabilitation. The review mainly focuses on impairment and activity limitation. Social, psychological and vocational aspects are left aside in this review.Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 08/2003; 35(4):153-62. · 1.68 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.