Article

Interrelationships between crime, substance abuse, and aggressive behaviours among persons with traumatic brain injury.

Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Ричмонд, Virginia, United States
Brain Injury (Impact Factor: 1.86). 11/1995; 9(8):757-68. DOI: 10.3109/02699059509008232
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Professionals have suggested that aggressiveness, substance abuse, and criminality contribute to poor outcomes after brain injury. There is considerable research regarding post-injury aggressive behaviour, but limited information concerning criminal behaviour and alcohol use patterns. With a sample of 327 patients varying in severity of traumatic brain injury, the present investigation examined alcohol use patterns, arrest histories, behavioural characteristics, and psychiatric treatment histories. Relative to the uninjured population, analysis revealed relatively high incidence of heavy drinking, both pre- and post-injury, among patients with a history of arrest. Increases in abstinence rates were found regardless of arrest history. In addition, a history of arrest was associated with a greater likelihood of psychiatric treatment. Findings also indicated relatively high levels of aggressive behaviours. Discussion focuses on implications for evaluation, rehabilitation, and future research.

2 Followers
 · 
53 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this chapter is to explore the possible relationship between brain injury or damage, on the one hand, and offending, on the other. In doing so it is important to set out in a little more detail the exact focus of concern.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To characterize long-term post injury drinking patterns of persons with traumatic brain Injury and to identify Injury-related and sociodemographic factors related to post injury consumption. Design: A cross-sectional design (n=322) was first used to characterize drinking patterns at three time intervals. A longitudinal design (n=73) was then used to examine changes in consumption patterns. %2 analyses and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test (t-tests) were conducted to investigate the relationship between patients' reported alcohol use and time post injury. Spearman rank-order correlations, y} analyses, and Fisher's exact probability tests were used to examine relationships among drinking classifications and injury-related and sociodemographic characteristics. Setting: Rehabilitation center outpatient clinics affiliated with the four brain injury Model Systems programs. Patients: Patients with moderate and severe brain injury who received acute medical care and inpatient rehabilitation. Inclusion criteria were: patient >16 years old, participation in follow-up medical and psychologic evaluations, and willingness to provide information regarding alcohol consumption. Main Outcome Measures: Quantity Frequency Variability Index, Disability Rating Scale, and Functional Independence Measure scores. Results: At each follow-up interval, the proportion of persons classified as moderate or heavy drinkers was generally comparable to that in the general population. Abstention rates, however, were markedly higher than those within the general population. For the cross-sectional sample, %2 analyses revealed no significant differences in the distribution of drinking classifications across follow-up Intervals. For the longitudinal group however, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks tests revealed substantial differences in drinking ratings for individuals over time. A pattern of increasing consumption was indicated. Correlational analyses revealed higher consumption levels for younger persons and those with higher admission blood alcohol levels. Furthermore, relationships were observed between injury severity and consumption levels. Higher levels of disability were associated with lower consumption rates. Conclusions: These data suggest that alcohol use patterns are dynamic during the first 4 years after injury. Also, long-term monitoring of alcohol use patterns may be cost-effective, particularly for younger persons and those with a prctnjury history of problem drinking (C) Williams & Wilkins 1996. All Rights Reserved.
    Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 09/1996; 11(5). DOI:10.1097/00001199-199610000-00006 · 3.00 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Agitation is manifested in many clinical populations. However research andpractice has been pursued solely within these distinct populations. This study examined whether behavioral components ofagitation (i.e., aggressiveness, disinhibition and lability) are differentially expressed in persons with post-traumatic agitation versus those with dementia and agitation due to Alzheimer's disease. Subjects were 19 agitated older adults with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease, 19 agitated older adults with recently acquired brain injury, and 19 agitated younger adults with recent acquired brain injury Agitation was measured using the Agitated Behavior Scale (ABS), with observations selected to assure that the overall level of agitation in each group was comparable. Analysis of variance indicated that the Total ABS score did not differ among the three groups, confirming that overall agitation was comparable. Differences between groups were not signifcantfor either Disinhibition or Lability subscale scores. However, a significant difference was evident for aggression. Planned comparisons indicated that the Alzheimer's and younger brain injury groups differed in this behavior but neither differed fom the older brain injury group. The findings provide initial support for the hypothesis that the manifestation of agitation is similar across affected populations
    American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease and Other Dementias 11/1996; 11(6):20-24. DOI:10.1177/153331759601100604 · 1.43 Impact Factor