The Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Hairpulling Scale: 1. Development and Factor Analyses

Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Mass 02129, USA.
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (Impact Factor: 9.2). 02/1995; 64(3-4):141-5. DOI: 10.1159/000289003
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We developed the MGH Hairpulling Scale to provide a brief, self-report instrument for assessing repetitive hairpulling. Seven individual items, rated for severity from 0 to 4, assess urges to pull, actual pulling, perceived control, and associated distress. We administered the scale to 119 consecutive patients with chronic hairpulling. Statistical analyses indicate that the seven items form a homogenous scale for the measurement of severity in this disorder.

1 Follower
73 Reads
  • Source
    • "On average, participants reported moderately severe TTM symptoms as measured by the MGHHPS (Keuthen et al., 1995) and PITS (Winchel et al., 1992), and moderately severe functional impact due to TTM-related thoughts and behaviours as measured by the YBOCS:TM (Stanley et al., 1993) (Table 3). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Trichotillomania (TTM) is characterised by the removal of one's hair, causing hair loss. Phenomenological research on TTM has investigated its associated behavioural and affective factors. Few studies have investigated the possible role of cognitions and beliefs, despite emerging support for cognitive therapies in treating this disorder. This study aimed to explore and describe the cognitions and beliefs that contribute to the onset and maintenance of hairpulling in TTM. Eight women with TTM participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews to explore their experience of cognitions and beliefs before, during and after typical hairpulling episodes. Interviews were analysed using the qualitative method of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Six superordinate themes of beliefs were identified as important: negative self-beliefs, control beliefs, beliefs about coping, beliefs about negative emotions, permission-giving beliefs, and perfectionism. These preliminary findings suggest that cognitions may play an important role in TTM phenomenology. Future quantitative research on the role of cognitions and beliefs in TTM in larger samples has the potential to advance cognitive-behavioural models and treatments of this poorly understood disorder.
    Behaviour Change 08/2015; DOI:10.1017/bec.2015.11 · 0.51 Impact Factor
    • "Repetitive behaviors were assessed using the Massachusetts General Hospital Hair Pulling Scale (MGH; Keuthen et al., 1995), Skin Picking Scale (SPS; Keuthen et al., 2001), and Nail Biting Scale (NBS). The NBS is a 6-item version of the SPS designed for use in the current study. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs), including hair pulling, nail biting, and skin picking are repetitive, habitual, and compulsive in nature. Although characteristic of disorders such as trichotillomania and skin picking disorder, BFRBs are associated with other psychiatric conditions as well. To date, research has failed to examine neurocognitive risk factors, particularly executive functioning, implicated in BFRBs utilizing a transdiagnostic approach. The present study recruited 53 participants (n = 27 demonstrating BFRBs and n = 26 randomly selected controls) from a larger sample of young adults. Participants completed an automated neurocognitive test battery including tasks of cognitive flexibility, working memory, and planning and organization. Results revealed that participants in the BFRB group demonstrated significantly poorer cognitive flexibility (d = 0.63) than controls. No differences were noted in other neurocognitive domains. However, planning and organization demonstrated a significant relationship with various BFRB severity measures. Implications, limitations, and avenues for further research are discussed.
    The Journal of nervous and mental disease 07/2015; 203(7):555-8. DOI:10.1097/NMD.0000000000000327 · 1.69 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Trichotillomania (TTM) studies generally include measures of symptom severity such as standardized self-report questionnaires (e.g., Massachusetts General Hospital-Hairpulling scale: MGH-HPS; Keuthen et al. 1995) or clinician ratings derived from structured interview (e.g., NIMH-Trichotillomania Symptom Severity Scale: NIMH-TSS; Swedo et al. 1989). It is also common in TTM treatment studies to incorporate objective measurement of alopecia, or hair loss resulting from hair pulling. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Numerous studies of trichotillomania (TTM) incorporate measures of the extent of alopecia (hair loss) resulting from hair pulling. This study used data from a clinical trial of stepped care for TTM to provide further evidence pertaining to a 1-7 alopecia rating scale (Tolin et al. 2002). Ratings were based on photographs of participants’ (N = 60) most severely affected pulling site. Alopecia rating proved highly acceptable (88 % completed the assessment), stable (10-week retest reliability r for wait-listed participants = 0.63), and convergently valid (r = 0.51 with an interviewer’s rating of hair loss based on live observation). Alopecia ratings were not significantly related to self-rated social impairment resulting from TTM, nor with total symptom severity. Hair regrowth rate varies by sex, age, and pulling site, so alopecia rating cannot serve as a direct marker of TTM treatment progress. Nonetheless, it appears to be a reliable and valid measure of a consequence of pulling that is of great concern to people with TTM. Future research should examine its potential treatment utility as a means of giving patients feedback on the side effects of progress they are making in therapy.
    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 01/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10862-015-9487-9 · 1.55 Impact Factor
Show more