Article
Routine emergency department use for sick care by children in the United States.
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, USA.
Pediatrics (impact factor:
5.44).
08/1996;
98(1):28-34.
pp.28-34
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (9)
-
Article: Prior treatment of fracture patients in a tertiary pediatric emergency department: informal referrals from other emergency departments.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purposes of this study were to determine the following: (1) the percentage of fracture patients at a tertiary pediatric emergency department (ED) who previously sought treatment for the injury elsewhere and (2) how often such patients were sent from another ED. A prospective survey was conducted in the ED of a tertiary pediatric medical center in a large metropolitan area. Patients who presented with suspected extremity fractures and previously sought treatment elsewhere were asked where they had sought treatment and whether staff at another ED had told them to come to the tertiary ED. Demographic, clinical, insurance, and transfer information were also collected. Ninety-two patients who had sought previous care for the injury elsewhere participated in the survey, with 82 (89%) ultimately being diagnosed with fractures. This represents 33% (82/246) of the patients with extremity fractures treated by the participating ED physicians during the study. Seventy-nine percent (73/92) of the subjects had previously sought treatment at another ED. For those who did not also visit a regular physician, 69% (37/54) were told to come to the tertiary ED by staff at the initial ED. No differences were observed based on race or insurance status because the study subjects were predominantly minority (91%, including 80% Hispanic) and lacking private insurance (84%). Seeking follow-up care in a tertiary ED, often on the advice of staff from another ED, is a common practice for this largely minority and poorly insured population. Because patients did not present to our ED until an average of 3 days after injury and many had been discharged to a primary care physician, it is likely that many of the patients did not require emergency care. This practice inefficiently uses limited emergency care resources. Level II prospective survey.Journal of pediatric orthopedics 04/2009; 29(2):137-41. · 1.23 Impact Factor -
Article: Pediatric emergency care in europe: a descriptive survey of 53 tertiary medical centers.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To examine determinants of quality of care provided by pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) in tertiary European centers. Analysis of questionnaires was sent to directors of PEDs. Questionnaires were sent through the pediatric research group of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. Three major descriptive categories were included in a 28-point questionnaire: institution's pediatric inpatient capabilities, scope of services, and medical staff education and structure. Sixty-five questionnaires were completed in full. Fifty-three tertiary medical centers from 14 countries were included in the study. In 86.8% of these institutions, the PED is separated from the adult emergency department; 91% have a pediatric intensive care unit, and 72% have an in-patient pediatric trauma service. Eighty-eight percent of the PEDs have incorporated triage protocols. Social service was not available in 17% of the departments. Sedation for painful procedures is provided by the staff in 77% of the PEDs. Only 24% of the PED medical directors have been formally trained in pediatric emergency medicine. In 17% of the departments, there is a 24-hour 7-day residents' coverage with no attending pediatrician or pediatric emergency medicine-trained physician. According to this pilot study, the basic services provided by tertiary PEDs in Europe appear to be appropriate. Physicians training level and staffing may not be adequate to achieve optimal patient outcome.Pediatric emergency care 07/2008; 24(6):359-63. · 0.92 Impact Factor -
Article: Family income gradients in the health and health care access of US children.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study sought to examine the shape and magnitude of family income gradients in US children's health, access to care, and use of services. We analyzed cross-sectional data from the 2003 National Survey of Children's Health, a telephone survey of 102,353 parents of children aged 0-17 years. Associations between family income [Below 100% Federal Poverty Level (FPL), 100-199% FPL, 200-299% FPL, 300-399% FPL, 400% FPL or Greater] and a set of 32 health and health care indicators were examined using linear polynomial testing and multivariate logistic regression. The percentage of children in better health increased with family income for 15 health outcomes. In multivariate logistic regression models that controlled for health insurance coverage and socio-demographic confounders, odds ratios >2 comparing the lowest to the highest income groups were noted for health conditions across both physical and developmental domains (diabetes, headaches, ear infections, learning disabilities, behavior/conduct problems, speech problems). Parent-reported global child health status, activity limitation, and oral health status showed steeper gradients than specific chronic and acute conditions. Ten measures of health care access and utilization were associated with family income in multivariate logistic regression models. Income gradients are pervasive across many health indicators at an early age. Social and health policy interventions are needed to address the multitude of factors that can affect children's health and initiate disparities in development.Maternal and Child Health Journal 06/2009; 14(3):332-42. · 2.24 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
Area Resource File
Child Health
children's use
emergency department
health insurance status
health resources
inappropriate source
nonpoor families
organizational characteristics
primary care physicians
public policies
recurrent health conditions
regular source
report emergency departments
routine use
Significant demographic risk factors
study examines factors
two-parent families
use emergency departments
usual source