Article

Residential care in hospital and in the community - Quality of care and quality of life

Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, London.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 7.34). 05/1996; 168(4):448-56. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.168.4.448
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The reduction of beds in long-stay hospitals has led to concerns over the quality of care offered to the remaining residents as well as that provided in the community. This study seeks to compare the quality of care and quality of life (reported satisfaction) from residents in both types of setting.
A cross-sectional comparison was made of community residential homes and hospital wards drawn randomly from lists provided by local authorities in the outer London area. Samples were drawn from all the main provider types (local authority, housing association, private and joint NHS/voluntary sector). Measures were taken of the quality of the physical environment, staff and resident characteristics, external management arrangements and internal management regimes, resident satisfaction and staff stress. Direct observations were also made of the amount and quality of staff-resident interactions.
In general, the most disabled residents were found to be still living in hospital in the Worst conditions and receiving the poorest quality of care. Although there were some problems with missing data, hospital residents also seemed most dissatisfied with their living situation. There were few differences between community providers regarding either the quality of care provided or the levels of reported satisfaction. Quality of care in the community homes seemed to be much more determined by the personality and orientation of project leaders.
Purchasers and providers still need to give attention to the problems of selectively discharging the most able residents to the community, leaving the most disabled being looked after in progressively deteriorating conditions. All residential providers need to review their internal management practices and try to ensure that residents are offered, as far as possible, the opportunity to make basic choices about where and how they will live. Staff training and quality assurance practices need to be reviewed in order to improve the direct quality of care offered to the most disabled individuals.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
56 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study is to clarify the influence of deinstitutionalization on discharged long-stay patients based on a review of recently published literature. English-language studies were searched from PubMed and Embase for the years 2000-2012, with the terms 'long-stay' or 'chronic mentally ill' and 'deinstitutionalis(z)ation' or 'community' or 'discharged' in the title and/or abstract. The present study defined long-stay as hospitalization >6 months. A total of 14 articles were identified. The majority of the participants suffered from schizophrenia. The most frequently assessed outcomes were social functioning, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life (QOL)/participant attitudes towards the environment. For social functioning, most of the studies found favorable changes. As regards psychiatric symptoms, stability or at least some improvements were detected. For QOL/participant attitudes towards the environment, positive changes, at least at some time-points, were noted. Significant deterioration was rare in all of the three outcomes. The majority of the participants showed enhancements in social functioning despite the fact that functional impairment is common in persons with schizophrenia, which indicates that even long-stay patients could achieve better functioning by deinstitutionalization. Although the stability in symptoms might be due to continuous schizophrenia course, moving to the community may also lead to improvement. The favorable changes in QOL/participants' attitudes towards the environment are in line with other studies.
    Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 07/2013; 67(6). DOI:10.1111/pcn.12071 · 2.04 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Tizard Centre The Tizard Centre is one of the leading academic groups in the UK working in learning disability and community care. The Centre's primary aims are, through our research, teaching and consultancy, to: ♦ find out more about how to support and work with people effectively ♦ help carers, managers and professionals develop the values, knowledge and skills that enable better services ♦ help policy-makers, planners, managers and practitioners organise and provide better services The Centre provides teaching through short courses, certificate, diploma and degree programmes at the University of Kent and elsewhere. It also maintains an extensive programme of research and consultancy, nationally and internationally. In all our work we are committed to acknowledging diversity and addressing issues arising from social inequality. We seek to align ourselves with service users and to reduce the disadvantage and discrimination they experience. We support user empowerment and the development of services that are responsive to user need. We seek to achieve our mission without further disadvantaging carers and service staff whom, we recognise, are often themselves relatively powerless and disadvantaged.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report the key findings from a study of adult protection referrals collected by two English local authorities during 1998-2005. Design/methodology/approach – Referrals were analysed for patterns relating to risk with client level data supplemented by information from the local authority databases and from the Care Quality Commission. The analysis also examined associations between adult protection processes and outcomes and looked at how adult protection monitoring data could be improved to better inform safeguarding management and practice at local and national level. Findings – Sexual abuse was most frequently reported for people with intellectual disabilities, who were also at higher risk of abuse when living out of area. Older people were most at risk of financial abuse in community settings and of neglect in residential care. Originality/value – The study identifies patterns of risk in the abuse of older people and those with intellectual disabilities and informs preventive interventions. It also indicates priorities for improving the quality and comparability of adult protection monitoring data.
    Journal of Adult Protection, The 10/2011; 13(5):238-250. DOI:10.1108/14668201111178157

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
43 Downloads
Available from
May 30, 2014