A temporal analysis of QMR.

Section of Medical Informatics, B50A Lothrop Hall, 190 Lothrop Street, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (Impact Factor: 3.93). 01/1996; 3(1):79-91. DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1996.96342651
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To understand better the trade-offs of not incorporating explicit time in Quick Medical Reference (QMR), a diagnostic system in the domain of general internal medicine, along the dimensions of expressive power and diagnostic accuracy.
The study was conducted in two phases. Phase I was a descriptive analysis of the temporal abstractions incorporated in QMR's terms. Phase II was a pseudo-prospective controlled experiment, measuring the effect of history and physical examination temporal content on the diagnostic accuracy of QMR.
For each QMR finding that would fit our operational definition of temporal finding, several parameters describing the temporal nature of the finding were assessed, the most important ones being: temporal primitives, time units, temporal uncertainty, processes, and patterns. The history, physical examination, and initial laboratory results of 105 consecutive patients admitted to the Pittsburgh University Presbyterian Hospital were analyzed for temporal content and factors that could potentially influence diagnostic accuracy (these included: rareness of primary diagnosis, case length, uncertainty, spatial/causal information, and multiple diseases).
776 findings were identified as temporal. The authors developed an ontology describing the terms utilized by QMR developers to express temporal knowledge. The authors classified the temporal abstractions found in QMR in 116 temporal types, 11 temporal templates, and a temporal hierarchy. The odds of QMR's making a correct diagnosis in high temporal complexity cases is 0.7 the odds when the temporal complexity is lower, but this result is not statistically significant (95% confidence interval = 0.27-1.83).
QMR contains extensive implicit time modeling. These results support the conclusion that the abstracted encoding of time in the medical knowledge of QMR does not induce a diagnostic performance penalty.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This chapter is designed to introduce the concept of computer-based decision support systems for patients. With the rapid growth of computing technology available to consumers and the virtual explosion of health information available on the World Wide Web, patient decision aids and computer-based health interventions are now a more common part of routine medical care. The new field of consumer health informatics deals with “developing and evaluating methods and applications to integrate consumer needs and preferences into information management systems in clinical practice, education, and research.”1 This technology, both hardware and software, is part of a growing trend toward empowering consumers to take a more active role in their own health care and to provide the necessary information to enhance their decision making. Today, more than ever, consumers are using information technology as an important supplement to the information provided by healthcare professionals in the course of clinical encounters.
    12/2006: pages 249-261;
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Temporal information is crucial in electronic medical records and biomedical information systems. Processing temporal information in medical narrative data is a very challenging area. It lies at the intersection of temporal representation and reasoning (TRR) in artificial intelligence and medical natural language processing (MLP). Some fundamental concepts and important issues in relation to TRR have previously been discussed, mainly in the context of processing structured data in biomedical informatics; however, it is important that these concepts be re-examined in the context of processing narrative data using MLP. Theoretical and methodological TRR studies in biomedical informatics can be classified into three main categories: category 1 applies theories and models from temporal reasoning in AI; category 2 defines frameworks that meet needs from clinical applications; category 3 resolves issues such as temporal granularity and uncertainty.
    Journal of Biomedical Informatics 05/2007; 40(2):183-202. DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2006.12.009 · 2.48 Impact Factor