Article

MR determination of hippocampal volume: Comparison of three methods

Department of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital University Paris VI, France.
American Journal of Neuroradiology (Impact Factor: 3.68). 11/1995; 17(6):1091-8.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine whether measurements of the volume of the hippocampal formation obtained from a three-dimensional acquisition not perpendicular to the hippocampus are statistically different from those obtained from a perpendicular acquisition.
Both hippocampi were studied in 10 healthy volunteers with two three-dimensional acquisitions, allowing three different volume-calculation protocols: (a) on sections from a coronal 3-D acquisition not perpendicular to the axis of the hippocampal formation (NOPERP protocol), (b) on sections obtained with the same acquisition but reformatted perpendicular to the axis of the hippocampal formation (REFOR protocol), and (c) on sections from a coronal 3-D acquisition perpendicular to the axis of the hippocampal formation (PERP protocol) obtained with the patient's head tilted backward. To obtain measurements of the volume of the hippocampal formations, an accurate 3-D processing technique was used to segment the hippocampus. In all subjects, two hippocampal formation right-left asymmetry indexes were calculated by using each of the three protocols.
For the right hippocampus, the mean volume was 3.42 cm3 (NOPERP protocol), 4.18 cm3 (REFOR protocol), and 3.91 cm3 (PERP protocol). For the left hippocampus, the mean volume was 3.29 cm3 (NOPERP protocol), 4.02 cm3 (REFOR protocol), and 3.74 cm3 (PERP protocol). For both hippocampi, the differences of the mean volumes were significant between each protocol. However, for both hippocampi, a high correlation was observed between volumes obtained with the different protocols. For the two asymmetry indexes, there were no significant differences for the means obtained with the three protocols.
With the use of 3-D acquisitions in the study of hippocampal formation biometry, different procedures lead to significant variations in the absolute values of the volume of the hippocampal formation. However, there is a strong correlation between the results obtained by each method.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Dominique Hasboun, Aug 21, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
87 Views
  • Source
    • "Compared with automatic methods of analyses, manual segmentation can be accurate, based on anatomical landmarks, but is more time-consuming and significantly more biased between different observers, especially for researchers less familiar with the fine structure of the piglet neuroanatomy [16] [17]. A further limitation of the manual segmentation method is the inherent inaccuracy when structural landmarks are invisible or difficult to define. "
    Dataset: MRI 2014
  • Source
    • "Compared with automatic methods of analyses, manual segmentation can be accurate, based on anatomical landmarks, but is more time-consuming and significantly more biased between different observers, especially for researchers less familiar with the fine structure of the piglet neuroanatomy [16] [17]. A further limitation of the manual segmentation method is the inherent inaccuracy when structural landmarks are invisible or difficult to define. "
    Dataset: MRI 2014
  • Source
    • "67 [42–85] 78 [60–92] ++++ 79 [64–91] ++++ MMSE: mean (range) 27 [6–30] 25 [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] 21 [13–29] Clock drawing test mean (range) 6 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] 5 [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] 4 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] GMV [ml] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hippocampal volume is a promising biomarker to enhance the accuracy of the diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, whereas hippocampal volume is well studied in patient samples from clinical trials, its value in clinical routine patient care is still rather unclear. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to evaluate fully automated atlas-based hippocampal volumetry for detection of AD in the setting of a secondary care expert memory clinic for outpatients. One-hundred consecutive patients with memory complaints were clinically evaluated and categorized into three diagnostic groups: AD, intermediate AD, and non-AD. A software tool based on open source software (Statistical Parametric Mapping SPM8) was employed for fully automated tissue segmentation and stereotactical normalization of high-resolution three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance images. Predefined standard masks were used for computation of grey matter volume of the left and right hippocampus which then was scaled to the patient's total grey matter volume. The right hippocampal volume provided an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 84% for detection of AD patients in the whole sample. This indicates that fully automated MR-based hippocampal volumetry fulfills the requirements for a relevant core feasible biomarker for detection of AD in everyday patient care in a secondary care memory clinic for outpatients. The software used in the present study has been made freely available as an SPM8 toolbox. It is robust and fast so that it is easily integrated into routine workflow.
    Journal of Alzheimer's disease: JAD 09/2014; 44(1). DOI:10.3233/JAD-141446 · 4.15 Impact Factor
Show more