AP-2.2, a novel gene related to AP-2, is expressed in the forebrain, limbs and face during mouse embryogenesis.

Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC), CNRS/INSERM/ULP/Collège de France, C.U. de Strasbourg.
Mechanisms of Development (Impact Factor: 2.38). 02/1996; 54(1):83-94. DOI: 10.1016/0925-4773(95)00463-7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Using a differential subtractive hybridization cloning procedure we have recently identified the AP-2.2 gene as a novel early retinoic acid-induced gene in murine P19 embryonal carcinoma cells. We have also shown that the AP-2.2 protein, which is highly related to the AP-2 transcription factor, can activate transcription when bound to an AP-2 consensus binding site [Oulad-Abdelghani et al. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol., submitted]. We report here the in situ hybridization pattern of expression of AP-2.2 transcripts during mouse embryogenesis. At 7.5 days post-coitum, AP-2.2 transcripts were detected in the boundary region between neural plate and surface ectoderm, as well as in extra-embryonic tissues. By 8.0-8.5 gestational days, AP-2.2 transcripts appeared to be expressed in premigratory and migrating neural crest cells. Over the following days, the AP-2.2 gene displayed region-restricted expression in the facial mesenchyme, especially around the embryonic mouth cavity and the nasal cavities, as well as in the surface ectoderm, nasal and oral epithelia. AP-2.2 RNA was also specifically expressed in the presumptive cortical region of the forebrain vesicles. AP-2.2 transcripts were restricted to the distal mitotic area (the 'progress zone') of the limb buds and of the genital bud. AP-2.2 expression also appeared to be specific for primordial germ cells in the genital ridges. Thus, the AP-2.2 gene is expressed in several embryonic areas whose development can be affected by retinoids, such as the forebrain, face and limb buds.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the mouse embryo the anterior ectoderm undergoes extensive growth and morphogenesis to form the forebrain and cephalic non-neural ectoderm. We traced descendants of single ectoderm cells to study cell fate choice and cell behaviour at late gastrulation. In addition, we provide a comprehensive spatiotemporal atlas of anterior gene expression at stages crucial for anterior ectoderm regionalisation and neural plate formation. Our results show that, at late gastrulation stage, expression patterns of anterior ectoderm genes overlap significantly and correlate with areas of distinct prospective fates but do not define lineages. The fate map delineates a rostral limit to forebrain contribution. However, no early subdivision of the presumptive forebrain territory can be detected. Lineage analysis at single-cell resolution revealed that precursors of the anterior neural ridge (ANR), a signalling centre involved in forebrain development and patterning, are clonally related to neural ectoderm. The prospective ANR and the forebrain neuroectoderm arise from cells scattered within the same broad area of anterior ectoderm. This study establishes that although the segregation between non-neural and neural precursors in the anterior midline ectoderm is not complete at late gastrulation stage, this tissue already harbours elements of regionalisation that prefigure the later organisation of the head.
    Development 01/2012; 139(2):423-36. · 6.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) inhibits neural specification and induces epidermal differentiation during ectodermal patterning. However, the mechanism of this process is not well understood. Here we show that AP2γ, a transcription factor activator protein (AP)-2 family member, is upregulated by BMP4 during neural differentiation of pluripotent stem cells. Knockdown of AP2γ facilitates mouse embryonic stem cell (ESC) neural fate determination and impairs epidermal differentiation, whereas AP2γ overexpression inhibits neural conversion and promotes epidermal commitment. In the early chick embryo, AP2γ is expressed in the entire epiblast before HH stage 3 and gradually shifts to the putative epidermal ectoderm during HH stage 4. In the future neural plate AP2γ inhibits excessive neural expansion and it also promotes epidermal development in the surface ectoderm. Moreover, AP2γ knockdown in ESCs and chick embryos partially rescued the neural inhibition and epidermal induction effects of BMP4. Mechanistic studies showed that BMP4 directly regulates AP2γ expression through Smad1 binding to the AP2γ promoter. Taken together, we propose that during the early stages of ectodermal patterning in the chick embryo, AP2γ acts downstream of the BMP pathway to restrict precocious neural expansion in the prospective neural plate and initiates epidermal differentiation in the future epidermal ectoderm.Cell Research advance online publication 4 September 2012; doi:10.1038/cr.2012.122.
    Cell Research 09/2012; · 10.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The anatomic complexity of the diencephalon depends on precise molecular and cellular regulative mechanisms orchestrated by regional morphogenetic organizers at the neural tube stage. In the diencephalon, like in other neural tube regions, dorsal and ventral signals codify positional information to specify ventro-dorsal regionalization. Retinoic acid, Fgf8, BMPs, and Wnts signals are the molecular factors acting upon the diencephalic epithelium to specify dorsal structures, while Shh is the main ventralizing signal. A central diencephalic organizer, the zona limitans intrathalamica (ZLI), appears after neurulation in the central diencephalic alar plate, establishing additional antero-posterior positional information inside diencephalic alar plate. Based on Shh expression, the ZLI acts as a morphogenetic center, which cooperates with other signals in thalamic specification and pattering in the alar plate of diencephalon. Indeed, Shh is expressed first in the basal plate extending dorsally through the ZLI epithelium as the development proceeds. Despite the importance of ZLI in diencephalic morphogenesis the mechanisms that regulate its development remain incompletely understood. Actually, controversial interpretations in different experimental models have been proposed. That is, experimental results have suggested that (i) the juxtaposition of the molecularly heterogeneous neuroepithelial areas, (ii) cell reorganization in the epithelium, and/or (iii) planar and vertical inductions in the neural epithelium, are required for ZLI specification and development. We will review some experimental data to approach the study of the molecular regulation of diencephalic regionalization, with special interest in the cellular mechanisms underlying planar inductions.
    Frontiers in Neuroscience 01/2012; 6:73.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 28, 2014