Should we still use the Harris and Benedict equations?

Nutrition in Clinical Practice (Impact Factor: 2.06). 07/1996; 11(3):99-103. DOI: 10.1177/011542659601100399
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Resting metabolic rate (RMR) is commonly predicted using the Harris-Benedict (HB) equations, but an overestimation of 10% to 15% is normally found. More recent studies have proposed equations with a better predictive value. In this study, we explore the relationship between measured RMR and HB in 67 healthy volunteers and in a data set from the literature and compared measured RMR with six more recent equations. Mean differences between RMR and HB were 21%, 12%, 10%, and 4% for the lowest to the highest RMR quartile, respectively, and 20%, 8%, 6%, and -4% for Owen's subjects. Among the six recent equations, only the World Health Organization (WHO) equations predicted RMR within 10% in 100% of the cases. Our results suggest that overestimation of RMR by HB is not a homogenous finding but is inversely related to RMR. This may have important implications for predicting RMR in women and in patients with diminished lean body mass. In addition, the WHO equations appear more precise than the HB equations.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nutrition of intensive care patients is often complex and challenging due to metabolic changes. For this reason nutritional support adapted to the metabolic state is of key importance to avoid hyper- or hypoalimentation and thus has direct impact on the prognosis. Target parameters might be beneficial to establish an adequate and differentiated nutritional strategy but thus far concerning single nutritional components evidence-based data are only available for adjusting blood glucose levels. Furthermore, an early enteral nutrition is of major prognostic importance. In practice a supplementary parenteral support is often required to provide adequate calorie supply. Monitoring of residual gastric volume as a tool to regulate an effective enteral nutrition might possibly become less important due to recent study data.
    ains · Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin 02/2014; 49(2):106-13. DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1368677 · 0.34 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To assess the nutritional status of elder adults by means of dietary and body composition parameters. Methodology: The sample comprised 49 adults, older than 50 years (23 men and 26 women) with a mean age of 54.84 ± 4.56 years, working at a private university. The body composition was analyzed by using anthropometric parameters. The energy and nutrients intake was gathered by means of a registry of all the foods and beverages consumed during 3 days that was filled-up by each (previously instructed) participant and estimating the amounts through photographic models. Total energy requirements were estimated by the Harris-Benedict and FAO/WHO calculations. Results: The body mass index was similar (p = 0.018) in both men and women (26.1 ± 1.9 and 24.4 ± 2.8 kg/m2). The percentage of fat obtained by anthropometrics was 29.6 ± 3.6 and 36.8 ± 3.1% (p = 0.000) in men and women, respectively. The level of physical activity was very light to light. Daily energy intake was appropriate for total energy demands when these were calculated by the calculations proposed by FAO/WHO. The caloric profile indicated an unbalance with high proteins and lipids and low carbohydrates intake. As for the micronutrients, the diets assessed indicated a deficient intake of folic acid and vitamins D and E, in both genders, and zinc and selenium also in women. Conclusions and recommendations: We have found overweight problems according to the BMI and the waist circumference, and obesity according to the body fat percentage, with the potential risk for the development of an associated complication. It would be advisable to improve the quality of the diets consumed by increasing the amount of some micronutrients and fiber, and by promoting an increase in the physical activity.
    Nutricion hospitalaria: organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Nutricion Parenteral y Enteral 10/2011; 26(5):1081-1090. · 1.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aims: Measurements of resting energy expenditure (REE) were compared with the data of 14 equations to determine their accuracy. Methods: REE measurements by indirect calorimetry in 1,032 unselected overweight and obese men (n = 306) and women (n = 726) were compared with calculations by 14 different formulas. Results: The mean (± SD) values calculated with the Owen, Robertson and Reid and WHO-I equations were not significantly different from our measurement of 1,682 ± 441.9 kcal/24 h. The values obtained with the Livingston, Mifflin, Müller and Bernstein equations were significantly different but still within a range of ±100 kcal/24 h. For females, the best comparison was observed with the Müller equation which, however, differed substantially in males. For men, the Cunningham equation was best, but it gave the worst comparison in women. A good individual match was only obtained with the equation of Robertson and Reid in 34% of the men and with the Owen equation in 38% of the women. All other formulas were less accurate. Drug treatment for 55% of the subjects had no effect on the mismatch between calculated and measured data. Conclusion: Calculations of REE with most equations seem to be valid in a group analysis but they are not helpful for the estimation of an obese patient's individual energy expenditure. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.
    Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 10/2014; 65(4):299-309. DOI:10.1159/000364953 · 2.75 Impact Factor


Available from
Sep 19, 2014