Article
Early and late allergic reaction in the nose assessed by whole body plethysmography.
Asthmacentre Heideheuvel, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
European Respiratory Journal (impact factor:
5.89).
09/1996;
9(8):1701-6.
pp.1701-6
Source: PubMed
-
Article: Nasal provocation challenge. The Committee on Upper Airway Allergy.
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 09/1990; 86(2):261-4. · 11.00 Impact Factor -
Article: Cytologic changes in the nasal secretions during the immediate nasal response.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In 102 randomly selected patients with allergic rhinitis caused by immediate hypersensitivity, nasal provocation tests (NPTs) with allergens were evaluated by means of rhinomanometry, and cytologic examination of the nasal secretions (NSs) was performed. The cells in NS of 117 positive immediate nasal responses (INRs) and in 68 negative INRs, correlating with history and skin tests, and in 102 control challenges with phosphate-buffered saline were stained by modified May-Grünwald-Giemsa, toluidine blue, and Hansel's method. The positive INR was accompanied by significant changes in the count of eosinophils (increase followed by decrease) in 67% of neutrophils (decrease followed by increase) in 40%, goblet cells (increase followed by decrease) in 41%, and basophils (decrease) in 13% of the NSs. No significant changes in the count of other types of cells in the NSs were recorded during most of the cases of INR. No significant changes in the count of individual cell types in NSs were found during most cases of negative INR. During the phosphate-buffered saline control challenges, the individual cell types appeared irregularly, and no significant changes in their count were recorded in any patient. The cytologic examination of NS, evoked by allergen, appears therefore to be a valuable supplementary diagnostic parameter for nasal allergy. The repeated counting of eosinophils in NS, before and after allergen challenge, appears to be the best way to discriminate between positive and negative nasal responses, since the eosinophils demonstrated significant changes in their count during 67% of the positive and only 11% of the negative INRs.Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 01/1989; 82(6):1103-12. · 11.00 Impact Factor -
Article: Correlation between symptoms and the threshold for release of mediators in nasal secretions during nasal challenge with grass-pollen grains.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Nasal challenges with pollen grains represent one of the techniques of provocation. However, the clinical criteria of positivity are not clearly established. Nasal challenges with increasing numbers of orchard-grass pollen grains were performed in 60 patients allergic to grass pollens and 20 normal subjects. Before any challenge, the nose was washed three times with saline and then lactose, and 50, 150, 450, 1350, and 4050 orchard-grass pollen grains were insufflated into the nostrils until a symptom score of 5 was reached. This score was mainly based on major symptoms of allergic rhinitis, for example, rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, sneezes, and to a lesser extent, on minor symptoms, such as pruritus, conjunctivitis, and pharyngitis. Nasal secretions were obtained after each challenge by lavage. Histamine was titrated by a radioimmunoassay with a monoclonal antibody against acylated histamine. Prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) was assayed with an enzyme immunoassay with a polyclonal antibody against PGD2 methoxamine. None of the normal subjects had a symptom score greater than 2; 55/60 patients had a positive challenge. The release of PGD2 was significantly (p less than 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test) correlated with a symptom score of 5; 74.5% of patients had a significant release of PGD2 in nasal secretions. In contrast, although 58.2% of patients had a release of histamine in nasal secretions when the challenge was positive, the correlation with symptom scores was not significant. PGD2 in nasal secretions increased 3.7-fold after a positive nasal challenge.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 12/1988; 82(5 Pt 1):869-77. · 11.00 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
15 allergic patients
15 patients
2 times
allergen challenge
allergen challenge day
detecting changes
inspiratory nasal resistance
mean percentage change
mean percentage changes
nasal airway resistance
Nasal challenge
Nasal resistance
noninvasive method
phase nasal reactions
phase nasal responses
phase period
physiological changes
positive reaction
standard deviation
whole body plethysmography