Safety of spinal and epidural anesthesia in parturients with chorioamnionitis.

Department of Anesthesiology, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Regional anesthesia 21(5):436-41.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The safety of spinal and epidural anesthesia in patients with chorioamnionitis was explored.
A retrospective study was made of the charts of 517 parturients who had received epidural anesthesia and 14 who had received spinal anesthesia before delivery and whose placentas had subsequently been found to be positive for chorioamnionitis.
Of the 146 blood culture results that were reported, 13 were positive. Of these 13 blood cultures, 5 had been drawn within 6 hours after placement of the epidural block, and four of the five bacteremic patients did not receive antibiotics until after the regional anesthetic was administered. One quarter (11/45) of the patients who were febrile and three quarters (174/229) of those who had leukocytosis before their block received no antibiotics before the block was placed. After the epidural block was performed, the catheter was left in place for over 24 hours in 18% (46/260) of the women who spiked a fever and in 14% (18/130) of those who exhibited leukocytosis during that period. There was no report of an epidural or spinal abscess or of meningitis in any of the women in the study.
Conduction anesthesia may be safe in parturients with chorioamnionitis without prior antibiotic therapy.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Regionalanästhesiologische Verfahren gehören zu den effektivsten Maßnahmen der Akutschmerztherapie. Inwieweit rückenmarknahe bzw. periphere Verfahren bei Patienten mit infektiösen Vorerkrankungen, Immunsuppression oder anderen Risikofaktoren durchführbar sind, ist bisher nur unzureichend untersucht. Literaturübersichten und Kasuistiken zeigen eine insgesamt seltene Inzidenz von schweren entzündlichen Komplikationen nach Regionalanästhesie. Wenn sie jedoch auftreten, sind vermehrt Patienten mit Risikofaktoren wie beispielsweise Diabetes mellitus, Steroidtherapie oder Tumorerkrankungen betroffen. Insgesamt erscheint die strikte Ablehnung regionalanästhesiologischer Verfahren bei vorbestehender Infektion oder Immunsuppression nicht gerechtfertigt, notwendig ist jedoch eine individuelle Nutzen-Risiko-Abwägung.
    Der Anaesthesist 03/2013; 62(3). DOI:10.1007/s00101-012-2097-y · 0.74 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neurological complications after obstetric central neural blocks are rare events. Although central neural blockade does cause neurological complications, there must be awareness that neurological deficits may either develop spontaneously (e.g. epidural abscess/haematoma) or as a result of the labour and delivery process (maternal obstetric palsies). We have attempted to review as completely as possible the published survey and case reports in the English literature on neurological complications of obstetric regional blockade obtained from Medline spanning the period 1966 to November 1998. We also performed cross-checking of our references to find important missing articles, e.g. papers published in journals not included in Index Medicus at the time of publication, such as the International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. We wish to provide some insight to the incidences, pathophysiology, clinical features, investigations, treatment and prognosis of these complications. Maternal obstetric palsies and case reports of spontaneous epidural abscess/haematoma are also discussed. It is often difficult, if not impossible, to determine the exact aetiology, but unfortunately for the anaesthetists, regional blockade is usually incriminated till proven otherwise. Although we cannot eliminate the occurrence of neurological complications completely, preventive measures can still be taken to decrease their incidence (e.g. aseptic technique). There must also be regular monitoring after neural blockade for the development of neurological complications. Early diagnosis and prompt appropriate treatment will usually lead to complete resolution of the neurological deficit even in cases of epidural haematoma/abscess.
    International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 05/2000; 9(2):99-124. DOI:10.1054/ijoa.1999.0347 · 1.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Spinal cord injured patients present multiple unique challenges to the anesthesiologist. These include choice of muscle relaxant and management of autonomic hyperreflexia. We report the anesthetic management for Cesarean delivery in a patient who was paraplegic due to spinal canal metastases. Preeclampsia and fever complicated this case. The patient presented at 29 wk gestation with progressive paraplegia at the T10 level due to metastatic osteosarcoma. She had a decompressive laminectomy without improvement in her paralysis. She subsequently developed preeclampsia at 31 wk gestation, and underwent Cesarean delivery for breech presentation under general anesthesia. Anatomical concerns left us unsure of the efficacy or safety of neuraxial anesthesia. Preeclampsia and autonomic hyperreflexia are generally indications for regional anesthesia for Cesarean section. Tumour in her spinal canal and laboratory abnormalities including thrombocytopenia and a potential urosepsis dissuaded us from this option. Additionally, rapid sequence induction and intubation were not preferred due to paraplegia, leading us to secure the airway fibreoptically.
    Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 12/2000; 47(11):1122-8. DOI:10.1007/BF03027967 · 2.50 Impact Factor