Article

Safety of spinal and epidural anesthesia in parturients with chorioamnionitis.

Department of Anesthesiology, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Regional anesthesia 21(5):436-41.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The safety of spinal and epidural anesthesia in patients with chorioamnionitis was explored.
A retrospective study was made of the charts of 517 parturients who had received epidural anesthesia and 14 who had received spinal anesthesia before delivery and whose placentas had subsequently been found to be positive for chorioamnionitis.
Of the 146 blood culture results that were reported, 13 were positive. Of these 13 blood cultures, 5 had been drawn within 6 hours after placement of the epidural block, and four of the five bacteremic patients did not receive antibiotics until after the regional anesthetic was administered. One quarter (11/45) of the patients who were febrile and three quarters (174/229) of those who had leukocytosis before their block received no antibiotics before the block was placed. After the epidural block was performed, the catheter was left in place for over 24 hours in 18% (46/260) of the women who spiked a fever and in 14% (18/130) of those who exhibited leukocytosis during that period. There was no report of an epidural or spinal abscess or of meningitis in any of the women in the study.
Conduction anesthesia may be safe in parturients with chorioamnionitis without prior antibiotic therapy.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
168 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Regionalanästhesiologische Verfahren gehören zu den effektivsten Maßnahmen der Akutschmerztherapie. Inwieweit rückenmarknahe bzw. periphere Verfahren bei Patienten mit infektiösen Vorerkrankungen, Immunsuppression oder anderen Risikofaktoren durchführbar sind, ist bisher nur unzureichend untersucht. Literaturübersichten und Kasuistiken zeigen eine insgesamt seltene Inzidenz von schweren entzündlichen Komplikationen nach Regionalanästhesie. Wenn sie jedoch auftreten, sind vermehrt Patienten mit Risikofaktoren wie beispielsweise Diabetes mellitus, Steroidtherapie oder Tumorerkrankungen betroffen. Insgesamt erscheint die strikte Ablehnung regionalanästhesiologischer Verfahren bei vorbestehender Infektion oder Immunsuppression nicht gerechtfertigt, notwendig ist jedoch eine individuelle Nutzen-Risiko-Abwägung.
    Der Anaesthesist 03/2013; 62(3). · 0.74 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The rapid onset of analgesia and improved mobility with combined spinal-epidural (CSE) techniques has been associated with a higher degree of maternal satisfaction compared with conventional epidural analgesia. However, controversy exists in that initiation of labor analgesia with a CSE may be associated with an increased risk for nonreassuring fetal status (ie, fetal bradycardia) and a subsequent need for emergent cesarean delivery. Overall, both epidural and CSE techniques possess unique risk/benefit profiles, and the decision to use one technique rather than the other should be determined based on individual patient and clinical circumstances.
    Clinics in perinatology 09/2013; 40(3):373-84. · 1.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Regional anaesthesia in septic patients or patients at risk, is a matter of concern. Patients with panaris or local sepsis may benefit of peripheral blocs for anaesthesia. Since efficacy may be reduced, the use of adjuvants (clonidine) could be recommended. Bacterial colonization of perineural catheters is common but the occurrence of local abscess is rare. Spinal anesthesia is prone to be complicated by bacterial meningitis, especially in case of violation of aseptic technique. In septic patients, the risk of CSF contamination prevents from using spinal anaesthesia. Epidural anaesthesia may be complicated by epidural abscess. In obstetrical practice, the use of epidural is not prohibited in a febrile parturient. In a patients suffering from infectious disease and post-dural puncture headache, the use of colloïd solution could be substituted to blood-patch.
    Le Praticien en Anesthésie Réanimation 04/2009; 13(2).