Article

Beyond CAGE - A brief clinical approach after detection of substance abuse

University of South Wales, Понтиприте, Wales, United Kingdom
Archives of Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 13.25). 12/1996; 156(20):2287-93. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.156.20.2287
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Generalist physicians should incorporate alcohol and drug abuse detection and brief intervention in the care of their patients. A suggestion of alcohol or drug abuse or a positive response to the CAGE questions deserves further assessment such as clarification about adverse consequences, inquiry about loss of control, determination of the patient's perception of the substance use, and an assessment of the patient's readiness to change behavior. Brief intervention with the patient in the clinical setting about alcohol or drug use can be effective. Motivational interviewing, a directive, patient-centered counseling style for enhancing motivation for change, can make brief interventions more effective by incorporating the patient's readiness to address alcohol or drug use. A useful clinical approach is presented that is tailored to the patient's stage of readiness to change alcohol or drug abuse behavior.

0 Followers
 · 
82 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Caring for patients who are active drug users is challenging. To better understand the often difficult relationships between illicit drug-using patients and their physicians, we sought to identify major issues that emerge during their interactions in a teaching hospital. DESIGN: Exploratory qualitative analysis of data from direct observation of patient care interactions and interviews with drug-using patients and their physicians. SETTING: The inpatient internal medicine service of an urban public teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen patients with recent active drug use, primarily opiate use, and their 8 physician teams. RESULTS: Four major themes emerged. First, physicians feared being deceived by drug-using patients. In particular, they questioned whether patients’ requests for opiates to treat pain or withdrawal might result from addictive behavior rather than from “medically indicated” need. Second, they lacked a standard approach to commonly encountered clinical issues, especially the assessment and treatment of pain and opiate withdrawal. Because patients’ subjective report of symptoms is suspect, physicians struggled to find criteria for appropriate opiate prescription. Third, physicians avoided engaging patients regarding key complaints, and expressed discomfort and uncertainty in their approach to these patients. Fourth, drug-using patients were sensitive to the possibility of poor medical care, often interpreting physician inconsistency or hospital inefficiency as signs of intentional mistreatment. CONCLUSION: Physicians and drug-using patients in the teaching hospital setting display mutual mistrust, especially concerning opiate prescription. Physicians’ fear of deception, inconsistency and avoidance interacts with patients’ concern that they are mistreated and stigmatized. Medical education should focus greater attention on addiction medicine and pain management.
    Journal of General Internal Medicine 05/2002; 17(5):327-333. DOI:10.1007/s11606-002-0034-5 · 3.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study is to assess the effect of brief motivational enhancement intervention postpartum alcohol use. This study is a single-blinded, randomized controlled effectiveness trial in which pregnant women were assigned to receive usual care or up to 5 face-to-face brief motivational enhancement sessions lasting 10-30minutes each and occurring at study enrollment, 4 and 8weeks after enrollment, 32weeks of gestation, and 6weeks postpartum. The setting is in a large, urban, obstetrics clinic. Participants were women who were ≥18years old, <20weeks of gestation, and consumed alcohol during pregnancy. Of 3438 women screened, 330 eligible women were assigned to usual care (n = 165) or intervention (n=165). Due to missing data, we analyzed 125 in the intervention group and 126 in the usual care group. The measurements were the proportion of women with any alcohol use and the number of drinks per day, reported via follow-up telephone interviews at 4 and 8weeks after enrollment, 32weeks of gestation, and 6weeks, 6months, and 12months postpartum. In random effects models adjusted for confounders, the intervention group was less likely to use any alcohol (odds ratio 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-1.09; P=0.08) and consumed fewer drinks per day (coefficient -0.11; 95% CI -0.23-0.01; P=0.07) than, the usual care group in the postpartum period but these differences were non-significant. Missing data during the prenatal period prevented us from modeling prenatal alcohol use. Brief motivational enhancement intervention delivered in an obstetrical outpatient setting did not conclusively decrease alcohol use during the postpartum period.
    Journal of substance abuse treatment 10/2013; 46(3). DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2013.10.009 · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT Background: Evidence suggests that some physicians harbor negative attitudes towards patients with substance use disorders (SUDs). The study sought to (1) measure internal medicine residents' attitudes towards patients with SUDs and other conditions; (2) determine whether demographic factors influence regard for patients with SUDs; and (3) assess the efficacy of a 10-hour addiction medicine course for improving attitudes among a subset of residents. Methods: A prospective cohort study of 128 internal medicine residents at an academic medical center in New York City. Scores from the validated Medical Condition Regard Scale (MCRS) were used to assess attitude towards patients with alcoholism, dependence on narcotic pain medication, heartburn, and pneumonia. Demographic variables included gender, postgraduate training year, and prior addiction education. Results: Mean baseline MCRS scores were lower (less regard) for patients with alcoholism (41.4) and dependence on narcotic pain medication (35.3) than for patients with pneumonia (54.5) and heartburn (48.9) (P < .0001). Scores did not differ based upon gender, prior hours of addiction education, or year of training. After the course, MCRS scores marginally increased for patients with alcoholism (mean increased by 0.16, P = .04 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.004-0.324]) and dependence on narcotic pain medication (mean increased by 0.09, P = .10 [95% CI: 0.02-0.22]). Conclusions: Internal medicine residents demonstrate less regard for patients with SUDs. Participation in a course in addiction medicine was associated with modest attitude improvement; however, other efforts may be necessary to ensure that patients with potentially stigmatized conditions receive optimal care.
    Substance Abuse 10/2013; 34(4):356-62. DOI:10.1080/08897077.2013.815143 · 1.62 Impact Factor