High-frequency endonuclease (REA) typing: results from the WHO collaborative study group on subtyping of Listeria monocytogenes.

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
International Journal of Food Microbiology (Impact Factor: 3.43). 11/1996; 32(3):313-24. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1605(96)01145-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Eighty isolates of Listeria monocytogenes were typed by high-frequency restriction endonuclease analysis. Two laboratories participated in the study with two restriction enzymes each. The enzymes used were EcoRI, Hae1II, HhaI. and its isoschizomer Cfo1. EcoRI was less discriminatory than the other enzymes. The profiles generated by Hha1 and CfoI were not fully stable for some closely related isolates. The size and the number of restriction bands generated by Hha1 in one laboratory and its isoschizomer Cfo1 in another laboratory were directly comparable. This indicates that REA-typing may be used as a definitive typing method for Listeria monocytogenes if the typing procedure is standardized. The stability of the REA-types needs further elucidation in order to establish firm differentiation criteria for comparison of isolates.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We used automated ribotyping on the RiboPrinter Microbial Characterization System to study the epidemiology of listeriosis in western Austria over the period 1988-1996. Thirty-six isolates containing three serotypes were included in this collection. Each of the 16 ribotype groupings (RiboGroups) produced in this study contained a single serotype. Isolates collected from within a single food factory environment all grouped into unique RiboGroups. One factory contained isolates showing two unique RiboGroups, both of which were also seen in patient isolates. This same set of Listeria isolates has previously been studied by automated laser fluorescence analysis of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD-Alfa). The data produced by the RiboPrinter system correlated well with the epidemiological information, better than the results achieved with RAPD-Alfa. The RiboPrinter system provides a rapid, easy, and useful method for the typing of Listeria monocytogenes.
    Journal of Microbiological Methods 05/1999; 35(3):237-44. · 2.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Listeria spp. are considered of interest in public health since their presence indicates the potencial existence of L. monocytogenes. Total cellular proteins and DNA from four strains of L. monocytogenes serotype 4, four strains of L. monocytogenes belonging to serotype 1, twelve strains of L. innocua, four strains of L. seeligeri and two strains of L. welshimeri isolated from ready–to–eat food were studied by SDS–PAGE and restriction endonuclease digestion. SDS–PAGE protein profiles obtained were species specific and could be evaluated by visual comparison. Enzyme for restriction endonuclease analysis was EcoRI, discriminating L. monocytogenes from other Listeria spp. These methodologies might be a helpful tool and a good alternative for epidemiological tracking of listeriosis in laboratories, where other methods are not available.
    Food Research International. 01/2004;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Large epidemics of diarrhoea associated with seafood consumption and Vibrio parahaemolyticus occurred during the austral summers of 2004 and 2005 in the environs of Puerto Montt, Chile (41 ° ° ° ° 29 ′ ′ ′ ′ S 72 ° ° ° ° 24 ′ ′ ′ ′ W). There are no reports of V. parahaemolyticus infections before 2004 in this region, their absence being explained by the low ocean temperatures which seldom reach 16 ° ° ° ° C. We analysed V. parahaemolyticus obtained from shellfish and clinical samples during epidemics. Isolates were examined using con-ventional protocols and an improved method for restriction enzyme analysis using total bacterial DNA which permits direct genome restriction enzyme anal-ysis by conventional gel electrophoresis (DGREA) with a similar discrimination index as restriction frag-ment length polymorphism-pulsed field gel electro-phoresis (RFLP-PFGE). Analysis of clinical samples showed that the epidemics were caused by the V. parahaemolyticus O3:K6 pandemic clonal group. On the other hand, analysis of shellfish samples dur-ing both epidemics showed that 53% contained V. parahaemolyticus (3–93 g − − − − 1). Detailed analysis of 50 positive shellfish samples showed that only three contained detectable levels of the pandemic clone. Most V. parahaemolyticus isolates obtained from shellfish corresponded to non-pandemic clones dif-ferentiated into 14 groups by DGREA. In summary, the causative agent during epidemics was only a minor component of a small but diverse population of V. parahaemolyticus in shellfish.