Article

Seasonal pattern of acute myocardial infarction in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction.

Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University-Medical College of Virginia, Richmond 23298, USA.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Impact Factor: 14.09). 12/1996; 28(7):1684-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00411-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to determine whether the rate of hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) varies seasonally in a large, prospective U.S. registry.
Identification of specific patterns in the timing of the onset of AMI is of importance because it implies that there are triggers external to the atherosclerotic plaque. Using death certificate data, most investigators have noted a seasonal pattern to the death rate from AMI. However, it is unclear whether this observation is due to variation in the prevalence of AMI or to other factors that may alter the likelihood of a fatal outcome.
We examined the seasonal mean number of cases of AMI (adjusted for the length of days in each season) that were submitted to the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) by 138 high volume core hospitals over a 3-year period (December 21, 1990 through December 20, 1993) during which the number of hospitals participating in the Registry was stable. Data were analyzed using general linear modeling and analysis of variance.
High volume core hospitals reported 83,541 cases of AMI to the Registry during the study period. Approximately 10% more such cases were entered into the Registry in winter or spring than in summer (p < 0.05). The same trends were seen in both northern and southern states, men and women, patients < 70 versus > or = 70 years of age and those with Q wave versus non-Q wave AMI.
We conclude that there is a seasonal pattern to the reporting rate of cases of AMI in the NRMI. This observation further supports the hypothesis that acute cardiovascular events may be triggered by events that are external to the atherosclerotic plaque.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
67 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We update an earlier review of smoking bans and heart disease, restricting attention to admissions for acute myocardial infarction. Forty-five studies are considered. New features of our update include consideration of non-linear trends in the underlying rate, a modified trend adjustment method where there are multiple time periods post-ban, comparison of estimates based on changes in rates and numbers of cases, and comparison of effect estimates according to post-ban changes in smoking restrictiveness. Using a consistent approach to derive ban effect estimates, taking account of linear time trends and control data, the reduction in risk following a ban was estimated as 4.2% (95% confidence interval 1.8 to 6.5%). Excluding regional estimates where national estimates are available, and studies where trend adjustment was not possible, the estimate reduced to 2.6% (1.1 to 4.0%). Estimates were little affected by non-linear trend adjustment, where possible, or by basing estimates on changes in rates. Ban effect estimates tended to be greater in smaller studies, and studies with greater post-ban changes in smoking restrictiveness. Though the findings suggest a true effect of smoking bans, uncertainties remain, due to the weakness of much of the evidence, the small estimated effect, and various possibilities of bias.
    Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 01/2014; · 2.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Seasonal variation in admissions and mortality due to acute myocardial infarction has been observed in different countries. Since there are scarce reports about this variation in Iran, this study was carried out to determine the existence of seasonal rhythms in hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction, and in mortality due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in elderly patients in Isfahan city.
    ARYA atherosclerosis. 01/2014; 10(1):46-54.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Christensen et al question whether our recent study regarding seasonal variance to the occurrence of venous thrombotic events, and its conclusion, is valid [1,2]. We appreciate the authors' concern and would like to commend the authors' way of discussing our findings by contrasting these to findings from Denmark on seasonal variance and venous thrombosis risk. We studied 5,343 patients with thrombosis from Milan, Leiden and Tromsø, spanning a nearly 3000 km long north-south axis over Europe, and found a 2.3% lower incidence in Spring than in Summer. Christensen at al included 152,548 patients from Denmark, and found an incidence rate ratio of Winter over Summer of 1.19. We offer four points with which to contend Christensen claims on the origin of our different findings, and their clinical relevance. © 2013 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.
    Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 03/2013; 11(3). · 6.08 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
0 Downloads
Available from