A unification hypothesis of pigment dispersion syndrome.

Department of Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, USA.
Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 02/1996; 94:381-405; discussion 405-9.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To synthesize recent findings regarding pigment dispersion syndrome in order to arrive at a hypothesis concerning the nature of an underlying genetic predisposition.
The literature on the subject was reviewed and analyzed.
Eyes with pigment dispersion syndrome differ from normal in that they have a larger iris, a midperipheral posterior iris concavity that increases with accommodation, a more posterior iris insertion, increased iridolenticular contact that is reversed by inhibition of blinking, possibly an inherent weakness of the iris pigment epithelium, and an increased incidence of lattice degeneration of the retina.
A gene affecting some aspect of the development of the middle third of the eye early in the third trimester appears at the present time to be the most likely cause.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To study the effect of exercise on the configuration of the anterior chamber angle in healthy persons.Methods: Both eyes of 22 healthy persons were scanned by Ultrasound Biomicroscopy. Before and after 10 minutes of exercise the anterior chamber angle and the area of the peripheral anterior chamber were measured on the scannings.Results: After exercise the anterior chamber angle/peripheral area increases in all eyes due to changes in the iris configuration. The myopic group shows the largest change.Conclusion: Reverse pupillary block (iris concavity) is not pathognomonic in pigmentary glaucoma, it occurs in all normal eyes after exercise, most pronounced in myopics. Consequently, the difference between physiological and pathological reverse pupillary block has to be clarified.
    Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 01/2002; 79(3):277 - 282. DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.790313.x · 1.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aqueous melanin granules are essential in the pathogenesis of pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma. We quantified aqueous melanin granules with the laser flare-cell meter in patients with pigment dispersion syndrome, assessed the measurement reproducibility, and correlated the numbers with clinical findings. Aqueous melanin granules were counted by means of the cell count mode of the laser flare-cell meter (KOWA FC-1000; Kowa, Tokyo, Japan) in 42 eyes of 21 patients with primary pigment dispersion syndrome under three conditions (undilated pupils, dilated pupils, after exercise). The reproducibility of the measurements was determined with the intraclass correlation coefficient. A control group of 40 age- and sex-matched eyes was also examined after pupillary dilation. The results were correlated with biomicroscopic findings in eyes with pigment dispersion syndrome (retrocorneal Krukenberg spindle, iris transillumination, pigmentation of trabecular meshwork). Numerous aqueous melanin granules were detected in eyes with pigment dispersion syndrome (mean, 2.9 +/- 3.7 granules/0.075 mm3) but only small numbers were counted in normal eyes (0.2 +/- 0.3, P < .001). Medical pupil dilation caused an additional increase of aqueous melanin granules in pigment dispersion syndrome (6.3 +/- 5.3, P < .001), but not undilated exercise (climbing stairs) (2.9 +/- 3.7, P > .5). The reproducibility of the measurements was very high (intraclass coefficient >0.92). The number of melanin granules correlated with the degree of Krukenberg spindle (r = .61, P = .004) and with iris transillumination (r = .69, P = .001). Quantification of aqueous melanin granules yields reproducible results and shows increased numbers in pigment dispersion syndrome, especially after pupillary dilation. Aqueous melanin granule quantification may be useful for evaluating eyes with pigment dispersion syndrome and for assessing treatment effects.
    American Journal of Ophthalmology 10/1998; 126(3):425-31. DOI:10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00098-1 · 4.02 Impact Factor


Available from