Article

Piotrowski, T. et al. Jaw and branchial arch mutants in zebrafish II: anterior arches and cartilage differentiation. Development 123, 345-356

Max-Planck-Institut für Entwicklungsbiologie, Abteilung Genetik, Tübingen, Germany.
Development (Impact Factor: 6.27). 01/1997; 123:345-56.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In a large scale screen for mutants that affect the early development of the zebrafish, 109 mutants were found that cause defects in the formation of the jaw and the more posterior pharyngeal arches. Here we present the phenotypic description and results of the complementation analysis of mutants belonging to two major classes: (1) mutants with defects in the mandibular and hyoid arches and (2) mutants with defects in cartilage differentiation and growth in all arches. Mutations in four of the genes identified during the screen show specific defects in the first two arches and leave the more posterior pharyngeal arches largely unaffected (schmerle, sucker, hoover and sturgeon). In these mutants ventral components of the mandibular and hyoid arches are reduced (Meckel's cartilage and ceratohyal cartilage) whereas dorsal structures (palatoquadrate and hyosymplectic cartilages) are of normal size or enlarged. Thus, mutations in single genes cause defects in the formation of first and second arch structures but also differentially affect development of the dorsal and ventral structures within one arch. In 27 mutants that define at least 8 genes, the differentiation of cartilage and growth is affected. In hammerhead mutants particularly the mesodermally derived cartilages are reduced, whereas jellyfish mutant larvae are characterized by a severe reduction of all cartilaginous elements, leaving only two pieces in the position of the ceratohyal cartilages. In all other mutant larvae all skeletal elements are present, but consist of smaller and disorganized chondrocytes. These mutants also exhibit shortened heads and reduced pectoral fins. In homozygous knorrig embryos, tumor-like outgrowths of chondrocytes occur along the edges of all cartilaginous elements. The mutants presented here may be valuable tools for elucidating the genetic mechanisms that underlie the development of the mandibular and the hyoid arches, as well as the process of cartilage differentiation.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Robert N Kelsh, Aug 28, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
177 Views
  • Source
    • "We next performed mcc loss-of-function studies using two antisense morpholino (MO) oligonucleotides: one targeting the mcc ATG (MO1) and the other spanning the splice junction between intron 6 and exon 7 (MO2) (see Fig. 1A). Embryos injected with either MO display varying degrees of microcephaly/microphthalmia, often with a shift in head position and loss of tissue anterior to the eyes – a 'hammerhead' phenotype (Piotrowski et al., 1996) – tightly packed somites and an embryonic axis that is shorter and ventrally curved from anterior to posterior compared with wild-type controls at 1 day post fertilization (dpf) (Fig. 2A; supplementary material Fig. S2A). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During vertebrate gastrulation, a complex set of mass cellular rearrangements shapes the embryonic body plan and appropriately positions the organ primordia. In zebrafish and Xenopus, convergence and extension (CE) movements simultaneously narrow the body axis mediolaterally and elongate it from head to tail. This process is governed by polarized cell behaviors that are coordinated by components of the non-canonical, β-catenin-independent Wnt signaling pathway, including Wnt5b and the transmembrane planar cell polarity (PCP) protein Vangl2. However, the intracellular events downstream of Wnt/PCP signals are not fully understood. Here, we show that zebrafish mutated in colorectal cancer (mcc), which encodes an evolutionarily conserved PDZ domain-containing putative tumor suppressor, is required for Wnt5b/Vangl2 signaling during gastrulation. Knockdown of mcc results in CE phenotypes similar to loss of vangl2 and wnt5b, whereas overexpression of mcc robustly rescues the depletion of wnt5b, vangl2 and the Wnt5b tyrosine kinase receptor ror2. Biochemical experiments establish a direct physical interaction between Mcc and the Vangl2 cytoplasmic tail. Lastly, CE defects in mcc morphants are suppressed by downstream activation of RhoA and JNK. Taken together, our results identify Mcc as a novel intracellular effector of non-canonical Wnt5b/Vangl2/Ror2 signaling during vertebrate gastrulation.
    Development 09/2014; 141(18):3505-16. DOI:10.1242/dev.114033 · 6.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The mechanisms involved in skeletal development are highly conserved between zebrafish and the mammalian species, such as the expression and regulation of the major signaling transduction pathways involved in bone development [13] [14] [15]. In the past, a number of mutations that affect zebrafish bone development have been identified [16] [17]. Some of them are highly conserved in vertebrate species (sequence, expression profiles and function). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using the fluorescent dyes calcein and alcian blue, we stained the F3 generation of chemically (ENU) mutagenized zebrafish embryos and larvae, and screened for mutants with defects in bone development. We identified a mutant line, bone calcification slow (bcs), which showed delayed axial vertebra calcification during development. Before 4-5 days post-fertilization (dpf), the bcs embryos did not display obvious abnormalities in bone development (i.e., normal number, size and shape of cartilage and vertebrae). At 5-6 dpf, when vertebrae calcification starts, bcs embryos began to show defects. At 7 dpf, for example, in most of the bcs embryos examined, calcein staining revealed no signals of vertebrae mineralization, whereas during the same developmental stages, 2-14 mineralized vertebrae were observed in wild-type animals. Decreases in the number of calcified vertebrae were also observed in bcs mutants when examined at 9 and 11 dpf, respectively. Interestingly, by 13 dpf the defects in bcs mutants were no longer evident. There were no significant differences in the number of calcified vertebrae between wild-type and mutant animals. We examined the expression of bone development marker genes (e.g., Sox9b, Bmp2b, and Cyp26b1, which play important roles in bone formation and calcification). In mutant fish, we observed slight increases in Sox9b expression, no alterations in Bmp2b expression, but significant increases in Cyp26b1 expression. Together, the data suggest that bcs delays axial skeletal calcification, but does not affect bone formation and maturation.
    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 09/2013; 440(1). DOI:10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.09.043 · 2.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Beginning with mutations isolated in the early large-scale genetic screens in zebrafish [1], [2] a large amount of information has accumulated on the genetic regulation of development of the pharyngeal arches of this species, and the region of the larval skeleton derived from the embryonic arches. Most of the studies focus on patterning of the first two arches, mandibular and hyoid, which by four days postfertilization (dpf), a day after hatching, have both developed cartilaginous elements with articulating joints between them. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Endothelin-1 (Edn1) signaling provides a critical input to development of the embryonic pharygneal arches and their skeletal derivatives, particularly the articulating joints and the ventral skeleton including the lower jaw. Previous work in zebrafish has mostly focused on the role of Edn1 in dorsal-ventral (DV) patterning, but Edn1 signaling must also regulate tissue size, for with severe loss of the pathway the ventral skeleton is not only mispatterned, but is also prominently hypoplastic - reduced in size. Here we use mutational analyses to show that in the early pharyngeal arches, ventral-specific edn1-mediated proliferation of neural crest derived cells is required for DV expansion and outgrowth, and that this positive regulation is counterbalanced by a negative one exerted through a pivotal, ventrally expressed Edn1-target gene, hand2. We also describe a new morphogenetic cell movement in the ventral first arch, sweeping cells anterior in the arch to the region where the lower jaw forms. This movement is negatively regulated by hand2 in an apparently edn1-independent fashion. These findings point to complexity of regulation by edn1 and hand2 at the earliest stages of pharyngeal arch development, in which control of growth and morphogenesis can be genetically separated.
    PLoS ONE 06/2013; 8(6):e67522. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0067522 · 3.23 Impact Factor
Show more