Referring and reporting research participants at risk: views from urban adolescents.

Fordham University, Department of Psychology, Bronx, NY 10458, USA.
Child Development (Impact Factor: 4.72). 11/1996; 67(5):2086-100.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Researching developmental risks of urban youth raises ethical concerns when an investigator discovers a participant is in jeopardy. This study collected data on 147 seventh, ninth, and eleventh graders' views of 3 investigator options: (1) taking no action and maintaining confidentiality, (2) reporting the problem to a concerned parent or adult, and (3) facilitating adolescent self-referrals. Participants judged these options within the context of 5 risk domains: substance abuse, child maltreatment, life-threatening behaviors, delinquency, and shyness. Judgments of reporting options were related to grade and ratings of risk severity, but not to moral reasoning. Confidentiality was viewed favorably for risk behaviors of low perceived severity or for which the consequences of adult discovery might introduce greater risk. Confidentiality was viewed unfavorably and reporting to adults favorably for child maltreatment and threats of suicide. Self-referral was viewed favorably across all grades and risk behaviors. Implications of adolescent perspectives for research ethics are discussed.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper highlights a number of ethical dilemmas encountered in a pilot study with a hard-to-reach group of research participants with harmful childhood histories. Drawing on a project exploring black teenage mothers' understandings of their own childhood experiences of abuse, it is argued that in asking young mothers to talk about such an emotionally sensitive topic as their own harmful childhood, a number of challenges are posed about how to deal with number of key ethical principles. The paper begins by outlining the context of the pilot study, including the research literature on this subject. It then discusses three key ethical principles that were considered during the process of the research: issues of gaining consent; and when the principle of confidentiality ought to be breached when a duty of care prerogative emerges. The paper explores these tensions in operationalising these principles when dealing with the competing needs and rights of gatekeepers, the young women and their carers, using occasional extracts from research findings to illustrate these tensions. The paper concludes with a discussion of the ethical challenges in accessing marginal voices in social research.
    Ethics and Social Welfare 03/2013; 7(1):54-73. DOI:10.1080/17496535.2012.666754
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Non-intervention research on adolescent risk often uncovers evidence of threats to the welfare of participants or others that may be unknown to adults in a position to protect youth or provide appropriate services. Whether to keep such information confidential or disclose it to guardians or professionals is a daunting ethical challenge that requires investigators to balance tensions between scientific responsibilities to produce well-controlled studies and humanitarian obligations to protect the welfare of vulnerable youth. This article discusses the ethical dimensions of such decisions and provides a decision-making strategy for developing ethically appropriate confidentiality and disclosure policies.
    Applied Developmental Science 04/2013; 17(2):88-93. DOI:10.1080/10888691.2013.775915 · 0.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is some debate whether asking questions to those who have experienced abuse and victimization forces them to relive the trauma, and if asking the questions is therefore justified. This question is further complicated when deciding whether to ask these questions to youth or adolescents as opposed to fully grown adults. In the small number of studies found on this topic, the authors stated also being surprised by the small amount of previous research done. Most studies asked questions about previous victimization and abuse, with some other sensitive topics also being covered such as violence, suicide, drug use, STDs, etc. The major findings were: • In defense of asking sensitive questions to youth, caregivers and young people indicate that sensitive surveys are important to conduct (Fisher, 2003; Helweg-Larsen, Sundaram, Curtis, & Larsen, 2003). • In studies assessing the impact of sensitive questions that involved youth (Ybarra,, only a small percentage of participants indicated distress while filling out surveys asking sensitive questions about previous victimization and abuse and other sensitive topics. • Studies found that factors like history of physical abuse, sexual abuse, and suicide, drug use, neuroticism, and post-traumatic stress disorder were more common in the small percentage of participants for which distress occurred when filling out a survey. Langhinrichsen-Rohling et al. (2006, p. 442) concluded the following: