The Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC): Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity

Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 6.35). 05/1997; 36(4):554-65. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-199704000-00019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To describe the history, factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC).
In two separate school-based population studies, principal-components factor analysis was used, first, to test a theory-driven factor structure, and second, to develop an empirically derived factor structure for the MASC. In a separate study using a clinical population, test-retest reliability at 3 weeks and 3 months, interrater concordance, and convergent and divergent validity were examined.
The final version of the MASC consists of 39 items distributed across four major factors, three of which can be parsed into two subfactors each. Main and subfactors include (1) physical symptoms (tense/restless and somatic/autonomic), (2) social anxiety (humiliation/rejection and public performance fears), (3) harm avoidance (perfectionism and anxious coping), and (4) separation anxiety. The MASC factor structure, which presumably reflects the in the vivo structure of pediatric anxiety symptoms, is invariant across gender and age and shows excellent internal reliability. As expected, females show greater anxiety on all factors and subfactors than males. Three-week and 3-month test-retest reliability was satisfactory to excellent. Parent-child agreement was poor to fair. Concordance was greatest for easily observable symptom clusters and for mother-child over father-child or father-mother pairs. Shared variance with scales sampling symptom domains of interest was highest for anxiety, intermediate for depression, and lowest for externalizing symptoms, indicating adequate convergent and divergent validity.
The MASC is a promising self-report scale for assessing anxiety in children and adolescents.

  • Source
    • "2.3.5. Anxiety symptoms The Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC) (March et al., 1997 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Adolescent depression and suicide are pressing public health concerns, and identifying key differences among suicide ideators and attempters is critical. The goal of the current study is to test whether depressed adolescent suicide attempters report greater anhedonia severity and exhibit aberrant effort–cost computations in the face of uncertainty. Methods: Depressed adolescents (n ¼ 101) ages 13–19 years were administered structured clinical interviews to assess current mental health disorders and a history of suicidality (suicide ideators¼55, suicide attempters¼46). Then, participants completed self-report instruments assessing symptoms of suicidal ideation, depression, anhedonia, and anxiety as well as a computerized effort–cost computation task. Results: Compared with depressed adolescent suicide ideators, attempters report greater anhedonia severity, even after concurrently controlling for symptoms of suicidal ideation, depression, and anxiety. Additionally, when completing the effort–cost computation task, suicide attempters are less likely to pursue the difficult, high value option when outcomes are uncertain. Follow-up, trial-level analyses of effort–cost computations suggest that receipt of reward does not influence future decision-making among suicide attempters, however, suicide ideators exhibit a win–stay approach when receiving rewards on previous trials. Limitations: Findings should be considered in light of limitations including a modest sample size, which limits generalizability, and the cross-sectional design. Conclusions: Depressed adolescent suicide attempters are characterized by greater anhedonia severity, which may impair the ability to integrate previous rewarding experiences to inform future decisions. Taken together, this may generate a feeling of powerlessness that contributes to increased suicidality and a needless loss of life.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 08/2015; 186:127-133. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.031 · 3.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "However, we also included the total MASC score to test the specificity of our hypotheses to social anxiety versus general anxiety. The MASC and MASC-SA have been demonstrated to have excellent retest reliability, internal consistency, and good convergent and discriminant validity (March et al. 1997). Importantly, several studies have demonstrated that the MASC-SA is highly correlated with measures of depression, such as the CDI, which is not surprising given the considerable overlap between depression and anxiety (Anderson et al. 2009; Muris et al. 2002; Rynn et al. 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Social anxiety and depressive symptoms dramatically increase and frequently co-occur during adolescence. Although research indicates that general interpersonal stressors, peer victimization, and familial emotional maltreatment predict symptoms of social anxiety and depression, it remains unclear how these stressors contribute to the sequential development of these internalizing symptoms. Thus, the present study examined the sequential development of social anxiety and depressive symptoms following the occurrence of interpersonal stressors, peer victimization, and familial emotional maltreatment. Participants included 410 early adolescents (53 % female; 51 % African American; Mean age =12.84 years) who completed measures of social anxiety and depressive symptoms at three time points (Times 1-3), as well as measures of general interpersonal stressors, peer victimization, and emotional maltreatment at Time 2. Path analyses revealed that interpersonal stressors, peer victimization, and emotional maltreatment predicted both depressive and social anxiety symptoms concurrently. However, depressive symptoms significantly mediated the pathway from interpersonal stressors, peer victimization, and familial emotional maltreatment to subsequent levels of social anxiety symptoms. In contrast, social anxiety did not mediate the relationship between these stressors and subsequent depressive symptoms. There was no evidence of sex or racial differences in these mediational pathways. Findings suggest that interpersonal stressors, including the particularly detrimental stressors of peer victimization and familial emotional maltreatment, may predict both depressive and social anxiety symptoms; however, adolescents who have more immediate depressogenic reactions may be at greater risk for later development of symptoms of social anxiety.
    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 07/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10802-015-0049-0 · 3.09 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The parent version of the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC: March et al. 1997; MASC-P: Baldwin and Dadds 2007) is a widely used measure of anxious symptoms in children and adolescents that was administered to parents at baseline and 3-month assessments. The MASC contains 39 items that assesses physical symptoms of anxiety, harm avoidance , social anxiety, and separation anxiety. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Theories of temperament suggest that individual differences in affective reactivity (e.g., negative affectivity) may confer risk for internalizing psychopathology in youth and that self-regulatory aspects of temperament (e.g., effortful control) may protect against the deleterious effects of high negative affective reactivity. However, no study to date has examined how the relationship between temperament and youth internalizing psychopathology may be moderated by stress. The current study used a prospective longitudinal design to test the interaction of temperament (e.g., negative affectivity and effortful control) and stressors as a predictor of youth (ages 7-16; 56 % female; N = 576) depressive and anxious symptoms over a 3-month period. Findings show that at low levels of stress, high levels of effortful control protect against the development of depressive and anxious symptoms among youth with high levels of negative affectivity. However, at high levels of stress, this buffering effect is not observed. Gender and grade did not moderate this relationship. Overall, findings extend current understanding of how the interaction of individual psychosocial vulnerabilities and environmental factors may confer increased or decreased risk for depressive and anxious symptoms.
    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 04/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10802-015-9997-7 · 3.09 Impact Factor
Show more