Article

Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea

Hugh Knowles Center (Dept. of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3550, USA.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (Impact Factor: 1.56). 05/1997; 101(4):2151-63. DOI: 10.1121/1.418265
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Basilar-membrane responses to single tones were measured, using laser velocimetry, at a site of the chinchilla cochlea located 3.5 mm from its basal end. Responses to low-level (< 10-20 dB SPL) characteristic-frequency (CF) tones (9-10 kHz) grow linearly with stimulus intensity and exhibit gains of 66-76 dB relative to stapes motion. At higher levels, CF responses grow monotonically at compressive rates, with input-output slopes as low as 0.2 dB/dB in the intensity range 40-80 dB. Compressive growth, which is significantly correlated with response sensitivity, is evident even at stimulus levels higher than 100 dB. Responses become rapidly linear as stimulus frequency departs from CF. As a result, at stimulus levels > 80 dB the largest responses are elicited by tones with frequency about 0.4-0.5 octave below CF. For stimulus frequencies well above CF, responses stop decreasing with increasing frequency: A plateau is reached. The compressive growth of responses to tones with frequency near CF is accompanied by intensity-dependent phase shifts. Death abolishes all nonlinearities, reduces sensitivity at CF by as much as 60-81 dB, and causes a relative phase lead at CF.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
151 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Brainstem frequency-following responses (FFRs) probe the neural transcription of speech/music, auditory disorders, and plasticity in subcortical auditory function. Despite clinical and empirical interest, the response's neural basis remains poorly understood. The current study aimed to more fully characterize functional properties of the human FFR (topography, source locations, generation). Speech-evoked FFRs were recorded using a high-density (64 channel) electrode montage. Source dipole modeling and 3-channel Lissajous analysis was used to localize the most likely FFR generators and their orientation trajectories. Additionally, transient auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), recorded in the same listeners, were used to predict FFRs and test the long-held assumption that the sustained potential reflects a series of overlapping onset responses. Results showed that FFRs were maximal at frontocentral scalp locations with obliquely oriented sources from putative generators in the midbrain (i.e., upper brainstem). Comparisons between derived and actual recordings revealed the FFR is not a series of repeated ABR wavelets and thus, represents a functionally distinct brainstem response. FFRs recorded at temporal electrode sites showed larger amplitudes and contained higher frequency components than vertex channels (Fz, Cz) suggesting that FFRs measured near the mastoid are generated more peripherally (auditory nerve) than measurements at frontocentral scalp locations. Furthermore, this reveals the importance of choice in reference electrode location for FFR interpretation. Our findings provide non-invasive evidence that (i) FFRs reflect sustained neural activity whose sources are consistent with rostral brainstem generators and (ii) FFRs are functionally distinct from the onset ABR response. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    Hearing Research 02/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2015.01.011 · 2.85 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Temporal summation was estimated by measuring the detection thresholds for pulses with durations of 1–50 ms in the presence of noise maskers. The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of the spectral profiles and intensities of noise maskers on temporal summation, to investigate the appearance of signs of peripheral processing of pulses with various frequency-time structures in auditory responses, and to test the opportunity to use temporal summation for speech recognition. The central frequencies of pulses and maskers were similar. The maskers had ripple structures of the amplitude spectra of two types. In some maskers, the central frequencies coincided with the spectrum humps, whereas in other maskers, they coincided with spectrum dip (so-called on- and off-maskers). When the auditory system differentiated the masker humps, then the difference between the thresholds of recognition of the stimuli presented together with each of two types of maskers was not equal to zero. The assessment of temporal summation and the difference of the thresholds of pulse recognition under conditions of the presentation of the on- and off-maskers allowed us to make a conclusion on auditory sensitivity and the resolution of the spectral structure of maskers or frequency selectivity during presentation of pulses of various durations in local frequency areas. In order to estimate the effect of the dynamic properties of hearing on sensitivity and frequency selectivity, we changed the intensity of maskers. We measured temporal summation under the conditions of the presentation of on- and off-maskers of various intensities in two frequency ranges (2 and 4 kHz) in four subjects with normal hearing and one person with age-related hearing impairments who complained of a decrease in speech recognition under noise conditions. Pulses shorter than 10 ms were considered as simple models of consonant sounds, whereas tone pulses longer than 10 ms were considered as simple models of vowel sounds. In subjects with normal hearing in the range of moderate masker intensities, we observed an enhancement of temporal summation when the short pulses or consonant sounds were presented and an improvement of the resolution of the broken structure of masker spectra when the short and tone pulses, i.e., consonant and vowel sounds, were presented. We supposed that the enhancement of the summation was related to the refractoriness of the fibers of the auditory nerve. In the range of 4 kHz, the subject with age-related hearing impairments did not recognize the ripple structure of the maskers in the presence of the short pulses or consonant sounds. We supposed that these impairments were caused by abnormal synchronization of the responses of the auditory nerve fibers induced by the pulses, and this resulted in a decrease in speech recognition.
    Human Physiology 07/2013; 39(4):355-363. DOI:10.1134/S0362119713040117
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For normally hearing subjects, harmonic complex tones that give “peaky” waveforms on the basilar membrane (Schroeder-positive phase, sine phase or cosine phase) lead to less forward masking than complex tones that give less peaky waveforms (Schroeder-negative phase or random phase), but have the same power spectrum. This difference has been attributed mainly to the combined effects of peripheral compression and suppression, both of which depend on the operation of the active mechanism in the cochlea. If this explanation is correct, the phase effect should be reduced or absent for subjects with moderate cochlear hearing loss. We measured growth-of-masking functions for forward maskers containing the first 40 harmonics of a 100-Hz fundamental, with components added either in cosine phase or random phase, using both normally hearing subjects and subjects with moderate cochlear hearing loss. The signal frequency was 1 or 2 kHz. For the normally hearing subjects, the mean slopes of the growth-of-masking functions at 1 and 2 kHz, respectively, were 0.53 and 0.44 for the random-phase masker and 0.31 and 0.26 for the cosine-phase masker. For high masker levels, the former produced considerably more masking than the latter. The phase effect was smaller for the hearing-impaired than for the normally hearing subjects, which is consistent with the idea that it is partly caused by peripheral compression and suppression. However, three of the five hearing-impaired subjects showed a significant effect of masker phase for at least one signal frequency. In one case, this occurred when the hearing loss at the signal frequency was 65 dB. The slopes of the growth-of-masking functions were consistently less than one for the hearing-impaired subjects. Further testing suggested that the efferent system was not involved in producing the phase effect.
    Hearing Research 06/2004; 192(1-2):90-100. DOI:10.1016/S0378-5955(04)00074-7 · 2.85 Impact Factor

Full-text (4 Sources)

Download
271 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014