Wrist biomechanics during two speeds of wheelchair propulsion: an analysis using a local coordinate system.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Impact Factor: 2.36). 04/1997; 78(4):364-72. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90227-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To describe motion, forces, and moments occurring at the wrist in anatomic terms during wheelchair propulsion; to obtain variables that characterize wrist function during propulsion and are statistically stable; and to determine how these variables change with speed.
Case series.
Biomechanics laboratory.
Convenience sample of Paralympic athletes (n = 6) who use manual wheelchairs for mobility and have unimpaired arm function.
Subjects propelled a standard wheelchair on a dynamometer at 1.3m/sec and 2.2m/sec. Biomechanical data were obtained using a force and moment sensing pushrim and a motion analysis system.
Maximum angles, forces, and moments in a local, wrist coordinate system. Each variable was evaluated for stability using Cronbach's alpha. Measures found to be stable (infinity > .8) at each speed were then compared to look for differences associated with speed.
The following measures were stable at both speeds: maximum wrist flexion, ulnar deviation, and radial deviation angles, peak moments acting to cause wrist flexion, extension, and ulnar deviation, peak shear forces acting between the radial and ulnar styloids, and peak axial force acting at the wrist. Of these measures, the following measures differed (p < .05) between speeds (+/-SD): maximum radial deviation (1.3m/sec, 25.1 degrees +/- 9.0; 2.2m/sec, 21.4 degrees +/- 6.9), peak flexion moment (1.3m/ sec, 3.4N.m +/- 3.0; 2.2m/sec, 5.2N.m +/- 3.7), peak extension moment (1.3m/sec, 10.4N.m +/- 4.8; 2.2m/sec, 13.6N.m +/- 5.1), peak shear acting from the ulnar styloid to the radial styloid (1.3m/sec, 2.3N +/- 2.7, 2.2m/sec, 8.3N +/- 7.5) and maximum axial force (1.3m/sec, 50.9N +/- 18.2; 2.2m/sec, 65.9N +/- 27.6).
This study found stable parameters that characterize wrist biomechanics during wheelchair propulsion and varied with speed. Ultimately these parameters may provide insight into the cause and prevention of wrist injuries in manual wheelchair users.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to investigate the kinematics of the wrist, elbow and shoulder during manual wheelchair maneuvers. A high incidence of musculoskeletal injuries has been reported due to the overuse and high repetitive motion of wrist, elbow and shoulder during wheelchair propulsion. Studies have been conducted with the use of a dynamometer or treadmill to simulate propulsion on level or inclined surface. However, during indoor maneuvering, turning and initiation of wheelchair movement is unavoidable. Six unimpaired subjects and six spinal cord injured subjects were recruited to perform three types of wheelchair maneuvers: straight-line wheelchair propulsion, turning and initiation of wheelchair movement with their comfortable speed. Using the motion analysis system (Vicon 370, Oxford), upper extremity kinematics were determined. Two general findings were indicated from the results: a) the joint movement were highest during straight-line propulsion when compared with turning motion; and b) the joint movement among the SCI subjects were higher than those of the unimpaired subjects during wheelchair maneuvers.
    01/2002; 3.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Manual wheelchair propulsion in daily life and sports is increasingly being studied. Initially, an engineering and physiological perspective was taken. More recently a concomitant biomechanics interest is seen. Themes of biomechanical and physiological studies today are performance enhancing aspects of wheelchair use and the ergonomics of wheelchair design. Apart from the propulsion technique the focus of biomechanics research of manual wheelchair propulsion is mainly towards injury mechanisms, especially phenomena of overuse to the upper extremity. Obviously, the vehicle mechanics of wheelchairs must be included within this biological framework.Scientific research is progressing, but is still hampered by methodological limitations, such as the heterogeneity and small numbers of the population at study as well as the inconsistency of employed technologies and methodologies. There is a need for consensus regarding methodology and research strategy, and a strong need for collaboration to improve the homogeneity and size of subject groups and thus the power of the experimental results. Thus a sufficiently strong knowledge database will emerge, leading to an evidence-base of performance enhancing factors and the understanding of the risks of wheelchair sports and long-term wheelchair use.In the light of the current biomechanical and physiological knowledge of manual wheelchair propulsion there seems to be a need for the stimulation of other than hand rim propelled manual wheelchairs.
    Medical Engineering & Physics - MED ENG PHYS. 01/2001; 23(10):713-733.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The primary purpose of this study was to compare static and dynamic optimization muscle force and work predictions during the push phase of wheelchair propulsion. A secondary purpose was to compare the differences in predicted shoulder and elbow kinetics and kinematics and handrim forces. The forward dynamics simulation minimized differences between simulated and experimental data (obtained from 10 manual wheelchair users) and muscle co-contraction. For direct comparison between models, the shoulder and elbow muscle moment arms and net joint moments from the dynamic optimization were used as inputs into the static optimization routine. RMS errors between model predictions were calculated to quantify model agreement. There was a wide range of individual muscle force agreement that spanned from poor (26.4% Fmax error in the middle deltoid) to good (6.4% Fmax error in the anterior deltoid) in the prime movers of the shoulder. The predicted muscle forces from the static optimization were sufficient to create the appropriate motion and joint moments at the shoulder for the push phase of wheelchair propulsion, but showed deviations in the elbow moment, pronation-supination motion and hand rim forces. These results suggest the static approach does not produce results similar enough to be a replacement for forward dynamics simulations, and care should be taken in choosing the appropriate method for a specific task and set of constraints. Dynamic optimization modeling approaches may be required for motions that are greatly influenced by muscle activation dynamics or that require significant co-contraction.
    Journal of Biomechanics. 09/2014;