Article

Flexible modeling of the effects of serum cholesterol on coronary heart disease mortality.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
American Journal of Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 4.98). 04/1997; 145(8):714-29. DOI: 10.1093/aje/145.8.714
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Current understanding of the impact of lipids and other risk factors on coronary heart disease is largely based on the results of parametric multiple regression analyses of large prospective studies. To assess the potential impact of the a priori assumption of linearity of continuous risk factors on the results of parametric analyses, the authors completed a secondary analysis of the Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence and Follow-up Studies (1972-1987) data using an assumption-free nonparametric modeling approach. The effects of total serum cholesterol and the ratio of total serum cholesterol to high density lipoprotein cholesterol, adjusted for common risk factors, were estimated using a smoothing spline method available in the generalized additive model extension of the multiple logistic regression. The data set included 2,512 men in the random sample of the Lipid Research Clinics study who did not take lipid-lowering medications. During the median follow-up of 12.6 years, 94 coronary heart disease deaths occurred. The generalized additive model fits the effects of total serum cholesterol (p < 0.01) and the ratio of total serum cholesterol to high density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.02) significantly better than the parametric logistic regression. Validation studies confirmed that, among new observations arising from the same population, generalized additive model estimates predicted outcomes better than the parametric estimates. Nonlinear effects of both lipid measures were robust and may be clinically important. The authors conclude that the linearity assumption inherent in parametric models may result in biased estimates of the effects of total serum cholesterol on coronary heart disease mortality and recommend that their findings be verified in a nonparametric analysis of data from another large prospective study.

0 Followers
 · 
73 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The validity and practical utility of observational medical research depends critically on good study design, excellent data quality, appropriate statistical methods and accurate interpretation of results. Statistical methodology has seen substantial development in recent times. Unfortunately, many of these methodological developments are ignored in practice. Consequently, design and analysis of observational studies often exhibit serious weaknesses. The lack of guidance on vital practical issues discourages many applied researchers from using more sophisticated and possibly more appropriate methods when analyzing observational studies. Furthermore, many analyses are conducted by researchers with a relatively weak statistical background and limited experience in using statistical methodology and software. Consequently, even ‘standard’ analyses reported in the medical literature are often flawed, casting doubt on their results and conclusions. An efficient way to help researchers to keep up with recent methodological developments is to develop guidance documents that are spread to the research community at large.These observations led to the initiation of the strengthening analytical thinking for observational studies (STRATOS) initiative, a large collaboration of experts in many different areas of biostatistical research. The objective of STRATOS is to provide accessible and accurate guidance in the design and analysis of observational studies. The guidance is intended for applied statisticians and other data analysts with varying levels of statistical education, experience and interests.In this article, we introduce the STRATOS initiative and its main aims, present the need for guidance documents and outline the planned approach and progress so far. We encourage other biostatisticians to become involved. © 2014 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Statistics in Medicine 12/2014; 33(30). DOI:10.1002/sim.6265 · 2.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cox's proportional hazards (PH) model assumes constant-over-time covariate effects. Furthermore, most applications assume linear effects of continuous covariates on the logarithm of the hazard. Yet, many prognostic factors have time-dependent (TD) and/or nonlinear (NL) effects, that is, violate these conventional assumptions. Detection of such complex effects could affect prognosis and clinical decisions. However, assessing the effects of each of the multiple, often correlated, covariates in flexible multivariable analyses is challenging. In simulations, we investigated the impact of the approach used to build the flexible multivariable model on inference about the TD and NL covariate effects. Results demonstrate that the conclusions regarding the statistical significance of the TD/NL effects depend heavily on the strategy used to decide which effects of the other covariates should be adjusted for. Both a failure to adjust for true TD and NL effects of relevant covariates and inclusion of spurious effects of covariates that conform to the PH and linearity assumptions increase the risk of incorrect conclusions regarding other covariates. In this context, iterative backward elimination of nonsignificant NL and TD effects from the multivariable model, which initially includes all these effects, may help discriminate between true and spurious effects. The practical importance of these issues was illustrated in an example that reassessed the predictive ability of selected biomarkers for survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. In conclusion, a careful model-building strategy and flexible modeling of multivariable survival data can yield new insights about predictors’ roles and improve the validity of analyses. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Statistics in Medicine 08/2014; 33(19). DOI:10.1002/sim.6178 · 2.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To illustrate the advantages of updating time-varying measures of disease activity, and flexible modelling in prognostic clinical studies using the example of the association between the frequency of past relapses and occurrence of ambulation-related disability in Multiple Sclerosis (MS).Study Design and SettingLongitudinal population-based study of 288 patients from Burgundy, France, diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS in 1990-2003. The endpoint was a non-reversible moderate MS disability (EDMUS score ≥3.0 derived from Extended Disability Status Scale). Alternative time-varying measures of attacks frequency included (i) conventional number of early MS attacks in the first two years after diagnosis; and two new measures, continuously up-dated during the follow-up: (ii) cumulative number of past attacks; and (iii) number of recent attacks, during the past two years. Multivariable analyses employed Cox proportional hazards model and its flexible generalization which accounted for time-dependent changes in the hazard ratios for different attack frequency measures.ResultsHazard ratios for all measures decreased significantly with increasing follow-up time. The proposed up-dated number of recent attacks improved model’s fit to data, relative to alternative measures of attack frequency and was associated with a statistically significantly increased hazard of developing ambulation-related MS disability in the next two years during the entire follow-up period.Conclusions Updated measures of recent disease activity, such as frequency of recent attacks, and modelling of their time-dependent effects, may substantially improve prognosis of clinical outcomes, such as development of MS disability.
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 11/2014; 68(3). DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.011 · 5.48 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
1 Download
Available from