Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog.

Department of Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.
Science (Impact Factor: 31.48). 07/1997; 276(5319):1687-9.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Mitochondrial DNA control region sequences were analyzed from 162 wolves at 27 localities worldwide and from 140 domestic dogs representing 67 breeds. Sequences from both dogs and wolves showed considerable diversity and supported the hypothesis that wolves were the ancestors of dogs. Most dog sequences belonged to a divergent monophyletic clade sharing no sequences with wolves. The sequence divergence within this clade suggested that dogs originated more than 100,000 years before the present. Associations of dog haplotypes with other wolf lineages indicated episodes of admixture between wolves and dogs. Repeated genetic exchange between dog and wolf populations may have been an important source of variation for artificial selection.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Tibetan Mastiff is one of the most archaic, ferocious and the largest dogs in the world. The Kunming dog is the chief working-dog breed in China. In this study, ten microsatellite loci were used to assess the genetic diversity and evolutionary relationships in six dog breeds, including Tibetan Mastiff, Kunming dog, Belgian Malinois, Labrador Retriever, English Springer Spaniel, and German Shepherd. The highest genetic diversity was exhibited by the Tibetan Mastiff, indicating useful protection and little inbreeding in the modern Tibetan Mastiff. Higher genetic diversity was observed in European breeds, supporting the hypotheses that breeders outcross their pure breed dogs occasionally to avoid deleterious effects in Europe. Evolutionary relationships showed that English Springer Spaniel and Labrador Retriever were clustered together, then with the Tibetan Mastiff, consistent with previous cluster results. German Shepherd and Kunming dog were grouped together, coinciding with the breeding history of Kunming dog. It is the first time that Tibetan Mastiff and Kunming dog have been analyzed with microsatellites.
    Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 08/2009; 22(8). · 0.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Archaeological evidence has long placed the origins of the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris) just prior to the beginning of the Holocene Epoch, some 12,000–15,000 years ago. Some studies of genetic profiles of modern canids have, however, suggested a much earlier origin, dating to Paleolithic times and perhaps exceeding 100,000 years. With such studies as a backdrop, cases have been made recently on archaeological grounds for Paleolithic dogs that in certain cases exceed 30,000 years old. When examined systematically, however, some such studies exhibit conceptual and methodological flaws, calling into serious question the accuracy of the cases advanced. At least one recent study highlights that difficulty. When a series of cases for putative Paleolithic dogs is assessed, convincing cases for such dogs are confined to about the past 15,000 years, or latest Paleolithic times. Further developments on certain specific fronts may change that, but for the time being the longstanding archaeological understanding of the dog domestication time frame continues to be reasonably accurate. Recent molecular genetic studies are converging on that temporal framework as well. Archaeologists need not be automatically swayed by ongoing changes in molecular genetic profiles.
    Journal of Archaeological Science 12/2014; 52:300–307. · 2.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Though it has been long presumed that peripheral populations tend to exhibit low levels of ge-netic diversity due to isolation and genetic drift, results of empirical investigation remain am-biguous. Some rusty-necklaced partridge (Alectoris magna) populations have expanded their present ranges, resulting in several peripheral populations, due to recent deforestation by hu-man beings in Northwestern China. On the basis of mitochondrial DNA control-region and microsatellite DNA data, we compare the genetic diversity (π-, H-, H 0 -, and H E -values) be-tween three peripheral populations and five central populations. Maternal and biparental DNA markers indicated accordantly genetic diversity. Compared to central populations, the periph-eral populations exhibited lower genetic diversity. The low genetic variability of the three pe-ripheral populations appeared to result partly from isolation and natural selection.

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
May 27, 2014