Article

Facial nerve injury in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma) surgery: etiology and prevention

Department of Neurological Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-7709, USA.
Journal of Neurosurgery (Impact Factor: 3.23). 08/1997; 87(1):60-6. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1997.87.1.0060
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Facial nerve injury associated with acoustic neuroma surgery has declined in incidence but remains a clinical concern. A retrospective analysis of 611 patients surgically treated for acoustic neuroma between 1973 and 1994 was undertaken to understand patterns of facial nerve injury more clearly and to identify factors that influence facial nerve outcome. Anatomical preservation of the facial nerve was achieved in 596 patients (97.5%). In the immediate postoperative period, 62.1% of patients displayed normal or near-normal facial nerve function (House-Brackmann Grade 1 or 2). This number rose to 85.3% of patients at 6 months after surgery and by 1 year, 89.7% of patients who had undergone acoustic neuroma surgery demonstrated normal or near-normal facial nerve function. The surgical approach appeared to have no effect on the incidence of facial nerve injury. Poor facial nerve outcome (House-Brackmann Grade 5 or 6) was seen in 1.58% of patients treated via the suboccipital approach and in 2.6% of patients treated via the translabyrinthine approach. When facial nerve outcome was examined with respect to tumor size, there clearly was an increased incidence of facial nerve palsy seen in the immediate postoperative period in cases of larger tumors: 60.8% of patients with tumors smaller than 2.5 cm had normal facial nerve function, whereas only 37.5% of patients with tumors larger than 4 cm had normal function. This difference was less pronounced, however, 6 months after surgery, when 92.1% of patients with tumors smaller than 2.5 cm had normal or near normal facial function, versus 75% of patients with tumors larger than 4 cm. The etiology of facial nerve injury is discussed with emphasis on the pathophysiology of facial nerve palsy. In addition, on the basis of the authors' experience with these complex tumors, techniques of preventing facial nerve injury are discussed.

0 Followers
 · 
230 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 1. Tinnitus is a common symptom in individuals with vestibular schwannoma (VS). 2. In 70–80% of cases, VS is ipsilateral to the tumor. It is the principal symptom in 10% and is moderate to severe in 14% of individuals. 3. Tinnitus in VS is typically associated with hearing loss (95%) and disorders of balance (50%). 4. Tinnitus in VS is mostly of high pitch. 5. Tinnitus is the predominant symptom in very small and very large tumors. 6. On the average tinnitus is not altered by gamma knife treatment, translabyrinth surgery, or retrosigmoid microneurosurgery, but the tinnitus of individual patients may improve or worsen after such treatments. 7. After retrosigmoid microneurosurgery tinnitus is often less troublesome than before the surgery. 8. Tinnitus might worsen after retrosigmoid tumor removal in operations in which attempts are made to spare hearing.
    Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 01/1994; 86(12):684-6. DOI:10.1007/978-1-60761-145-5_85 · 2.02 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (IFNM) is a suitable technique for intraoperative facial nerve identification and dissection, especially in large vestibular schwannomas (VS) (acoustic neuroma). To evaluate its feasibility for estimating functional nerve outcome after VS resection 60 patients underwent surgery using IFNM. Out of this group the last 40 patients were included in a prospective study evaluating the prognostic value of various IFNM parameters (proximal and distal absolute EMG amplitude, stimulation threshold, and proximal-to-distal amplitude ratio) for prediction of initial postoperative facial nerve function and recovery of function. Stimulation threshold and absolute EMG amplitude proximally at the brain stem were both predictive for postoperative nerve function. Good initial facial nerve outcome (modified House Brackmann grading, mHB degree I and degree II) was found in 15/16 patients with a proximal EMG amplitude greater than 800 microV and in 19/22 patients with proximal stimulation threshold less than 0.3 mA. Sixteen of 16 patients with proximal stimulation threshold equal to or greater than 0.3 mA had moderate-to-severe facial palsy (mHB degree III or worse). Six of six patients without evokable proximal amplitude initially had insufficient nerve function (mHB degree IV). Intraoperative decrease of the proximal amplitude was associated with an unfavourable outcome, whereas distal amplitudes usually stayed unchanged. Mean distal EMG amplitudes were also found to be decreased with poor nerve function, which may mean that the tumour had already affected the nerve. A proximal amplitude of 300 microV or less and a proximal-to-distal amplitude ratio below 1:3 were found in the absence of functional recovery in 6/8 (75%) and 5/6 (83%) patients with initial mHB degree IV, respectively. Two patients with initial mHB degree IV improved to mHB degree III despite intraoperative evidence of missing functional nerve integrity. Therefore, functional recovery cannot be predicted by IFNM in all cases of anatomical nerve preservation. We conclude that a minimum follow-up period of 1 year may still be advisable even in certain patients without evidence of intraoperative functional nerve integrity.
    Acta Neurochirurgica 02/1998; 140(3):235-42; discussion 242-3. DOI:10.1007/s007010050090 · 1.79 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas) have long been considered one of the most difficult tumors to remove without causing neurologic dysfunction. In recent years, with marked improvements in neurophysiologic monitoring, microsurgical techniques, and neuroimaging, the focus of treatment has shifted from prolongation of life to preservation of cranial nerve function. Contemporary treatment of vestibular schwannoma includes serial evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional microsurgical resection, and stereotactic radiosurgery. Microsurgical removal may be subdivided by approach: retrosigmoid, translabyrinthine, or middle fossa depending on the patient's preoperative neurologic status and the experience of the surgeon. Furthermore, radiosurgery may involve gamma knife radiation, linear accelerator, or heavy particle radiation. Despite great advances in the treatment of these complex tumors, there is still debate as to what constitutes optimal management. This is particularly true when one considers cranial nerve preservation. In this review, we analyze several recent articles that deal with strategies for preserving cranial nerve function before, during, and after treatment. We present a variety of perspectives, and in doing so, we hope to shed light on some of the ongoing controversies surrounding the contemporary treatment of vestibular schwannomas.
    Critical Reviews in Neurosurgery 02/1998; 8(2):86-96. DOI:10.1007/s003290050065