Duration of cognitive dysfunction after concussion, and cognitive dysfunction as a risk factor: a population study of young men.

Psychological Laboratory, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
BMJ Clinical Research (Impact Factor: 14.09). 10/1997; 315(7108):569-72. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7108.569
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To establish how long cognitive dysfunction lasts after concussion, and the extent to which it may be a predisposing risk factor for concussion, by examining the prevalence of cognitive dysfunction among young men who have sustained concussion.
Observational study.
1220 young men who had been admitted to hospital for concussion between the ages of 16 and 24 (identified in a national register of admissions) and who had also been cognitively tested by the Danish conscription draft board.
Score on the draft board's cognitive screening test, dichotomised as dysfunctional or non-dysfunctional (20.4% of the general population of Danish men appearing before the draft board had a dysfunctional score).
700 of the 1220 men had been tested after sustaining concussion; 520 had been tested before concussion. Four (50%) of the eight men who were tested less than seven days after the injury had a dysfunctional score. Among groups of the remaining 692 men who were tested at later time points after injury, the rates were only marginally raised (range 21.4% to 26.5%) above the population level. Among men tested before injury, the rate of dysfunctional scores was higher (30.4% (158/520)). Apart from suggesting cognitive dysfunction as a risk factor for concussion, this higher proportion seems to relate to the fact that they were typically injured as young adults, whereas those men who were tested after concussion had more often been injured as adolescents. The relative risk for concussion in the presence of cognitive dysfunction is estimated to be 1.57 (95% confidence interval 1.32 to 1.86).
Cognitive dysfunction is not only a short term consequence of concussion but also a predisposing risk factor for concussion, more so for young adults than for adolescents.

Download full-text


Available from: Thomas W Teasdale, Jul 21, 2014
  • Source
    • ") suggested that intelligence and higher educational level are protective factors against injury risk. Correspondingly , Teasdale and Engberg (1997) found indications that even mild concussions during early adolescence were associated with poorer BPP performance such as to suggest that cognitive deficits were a risk factor for both sustaining concussions and poor BPP performance. However, Teasdale and Engberg (2003) also found that more severe brain injury, during childhood and adolescence, resulted in more greatly reduced BPP performance in a manner which was interpreted to suggest that the injury had had a direct causal effect on cognitive functioning. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For over 50 years the Danish draft board has used the same test, Børge Priens Prøve (BPP) for cognitive abilities, involving four paper-and-pencil subtests, to assess suitability for conscription. The potential availability of test scores has been an invaluable resource for research into factors relating to intelligence. In this article the circumstances of the original development of the test are briefly presented, followed by a description of the four subtests and the conditions of testing, scoring and result registration. Over forty studies are identified, including some unpublished, which have explored the psychometric properties of the BPP and have shown the relationships between intelligence as measured by the BPP and a wide range of biological, social and health-related factors.
    Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 12/2009; 50(6):633-8. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00789.x · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
    BMJ Clinical Research 03/1998; 316(7134):865. · 14.09 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 01/1999; 65(6):809. DOI:10.1136/jnnp.65.6.809 · 5.58 Impact Factor
Show more