Duration of cognitive dysfunction after concussion, and cognitive dysfunction as a risk factor: a population study of young men.

Psychological Laboratory, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
BMJ Clinical Research (Impact Factor: 14.09). 10/1997; 315(7108):569-72. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7108.569
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To establish how long cognitive dysfunction lasts after concussion, and the extent to which it may be a predisposing risk factor for concussion, by examining the prevalence of cognitive dysfunction among young men who have sustained concussion.
Observational study.
1220 young men who had been admitted to hospital for concussion between the ages of 16 and 24 (identified in a national register of admissions) and who had also been cognitively tested by the Danish conscription draft board.
Score on the draft board's cognitive screening test, dichotomised as dysfunctional or non-dysfunctional (20.4% of the general population of Danish men appearing before the draft board had a dysfunctional score).
700 of the 1220 men had been tested after sustaining concussion; 520 had been tested before concussion. Four (50%) of the eight men who were tested less than seven days after the injury had a dysfunctional score. Among groups of the remaining 692 men who were tested at later time points after injury, the rates were only marginally raised (range 21.4% to 26.5%) above the population level. Among men tested before injury, the rate of dysfunctional scores was higher (30.4% (158/520)). Apart from suggesting cognitive dysfunction as a risk factor for concussion, this higher proportion seems to relate to the fact that they were typically injured as young adults, whereas those men who were tested after concussion had more often been injured as adolescents. The relative risk for concussion in the presence of cognitive dysfunction is estimated to be 1.57 (95% confidence interval 1.32 to 1.86).
Cognitive dysfunction is not only a short term consequence of concussion but also a predisposing risk factor for concussion, more so for young adults than for adolescents.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cranioencephalic traumatisms in developed countries are caused by the following types of accidents: traffic, work, domestic and that occurring while practicing a sport. We should add cranial traumatisms caused by heteroaggressions that mean an elevated percentage of cases in some countries to these external causes. Accidents in general are caused by a complex interaction of very different factors: socioeconomic (industrialization, progressive mechanization of society, increase in availability of economic resources as occurs in periods of economic expansion, etc.); sociocultural (increase of social aggressiveness, consumption of stimulant drugs, progressive habit of practicing risk sports, etc.) and individual. Within the latter, psychological and psychiatric factors are of great importance and can predispose an individual to an accident and therefore a cranioencephalic traumatism. In this chapter, the authors perform an up-dated review of the existing data on this latter aspect, trying to use a multiaxial approach: «psychiatric disorders», «personality disorders» and «reaction of the individuals to psychosocial and environmental problems.» This multiaxial system provides us an adequate format to understand the complexity of these clinical situations and promotes the application of the biopsychosocial model in the study of this area of knowledge of traumatic brain damage. Finally, we refer to the predisposition to accidents both in infants as well as in the geriatric age.
    Rehabilitación 01/2002; 36(6):353–363. DOI:10.1016/S0048-7120(02)73307-0
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Outcome after a traumatic brain injury (TBI) can be quite variable and unpredictable. This suggests factors other than injury severity play important roles in outcome. Host genotype might be one such factor. This chapter reviews key concepts important to understanding genetic influences on the response to and recovery from TBI. As an organizing framework, four broad contexts in which individual differences could play an important role in outcome after trauma are presented: (1) genes that may modulate injury extent and serve to augment or dampen the impact of a given "dose" of neurotrauma, (2) genes that may play a role in repair and recovery from injury and thus impact the trajectory of recovery and ultimate functional outcome, (3) genes modulating preinjury traits (e.g., resilience), or cognition (cognitive reserve), (4) interactions between genetic vulnerabilities to neurobehavioral disorders and neurotrauma (i.e., role of comorbidities). Each of these four broad categories involve multiple components and thus are under complex polygenic control suggesting that functional outcome following TBI is best viewed as a complex polygenic phenotype. Although the individual contribution of a given allele might be small, the effects of multiple alleles could be quite significant. © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Handbook of Clinical Neurology 01/2015; 128:723-39. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-444-63521-1.00045-5
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study reports results from 143 adult patients with cerebrovascular accident, traumatic brain injury or other acquired brain injury who underwent a neuropsychologically-based post-acute rehabilitation programme. Immediately pre- and post-programme, patients, as well as close relatives, completed the European Brain Injury Questionnaire (EBIQ) regarding patient symptoms, together with the impact of injury on the relative. Results for the three groups of patients were compared to those of 64 control subjects without brain injury. There were three major findings. First, significantly higher levels of symptoms were found in the patient groups at pre-programme evaluation, compared to the control group.Within the patient groups there were comparatively few differences between the self-reports of the patients and the reports of their relatives. Second, the patients showed significantly reduced levels of symptoms post-programme, both in their self-reports and in their relatives' reports. These levels remained however above those of the control group. Third, the reported impact of the injury to the patient upon their relatives was significantly reduced post-programme. Thus, this study further documents that patient symptoms, and the impact of these on close relatives, may be broadly reduced, but perhaps not eliminated, as a result of neuropsychological rehabilitation.
    Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 12/2004; 14(5):495-515. DOI:10.1080/09602010343000318 · 2.07 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jul 21, 2014