Comparative periurethral bacteriology of uncircumcised and circumcised males.

Paediatric Surgery Unit. E Wolfson Hospital, Holon, Israel.
Genitourinary medicine 09/1997; 73(4):288-90. DOI: 10.1136/sti.73.4.288
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT It has been established that lack of circumcision increases the risk of urinary tract infection in infants. During the first six months, the presence of foreskin is associated with a greater quantity and a higher concentration of uropathogens in the periurethral area. Very little is known about this association in older males.
To compare the periurethral bacteriology of uncircumcised healthy males of more than one year of age.
The periurethral area of 125 uncircumcised and 46 circumcised healthy males (mean age, 26.5 and 28.3 years, respectively) was swabbed and cultured for facultative and anaerobic bacteria, genital mycoplasmas and Chlamydia trachomatis.
Facultative Gram positive cocci predominated in both groups (62% and 80%, respectively). Pure culture of facultative Gram negative rods was more common in uncircumcised males (17% v 4% in circumcised males, p = 0.01). Streptococci, strict anaerobes and genital mycoplasmas were found almost exclusively in uncircumcised males of more than 15 years of age. No case of C trachomatis was identified.
The higher prevalence of potential uropathogens in the subpreputial space is in accordance with a previous finding of increased risk of urinary tract infection in uncircumcised young men. Our results also support the role of the prepuce as a reservoir for sexually transmitted organisms.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) in normal boys is 1%. This risk is significantly increased in boys with congenital abnormalities of the urinary tract, which includes such abnormalities as vesico-ureteric reflux, obstructive megaureter (VUJO) and posterior urethral valves. UTI in these boys can lead to urosepsis, a potentially life-threatening complication, and in the longer term renal scarring complicating pyelonephritis can lead to chronic renal impairment or even end-stage renal disease. Circumcision has been shown in normal boys to reduce the risk of UTI by 90%, and potentially could be a simple intervention to reduce the risk of urosepsis and renal scarring. In order to make this decision a clinician really needs to have the answers to two questions: 1) What is the risk of UTI in this particular boy? 2) What is the evidence of efficacy of circumcision in this particular condition? This article reviews what evidence exists to make a calculation of the risk/benefit ratio for circumcision in boys with abnormalities of the urinary tract.
    Pediatric Nephrology 02/2013; · 2.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective Redundant prepuce and phimosis are known risk factors for balanoposthitis. It is usually caused by retrograde infection and is related to the preputial bacterial flora. We investigated differences in the preputial bacterial flora between patients with balanoposthitis and physiological phimosis.Materials and Methods Fifty-six male children were included in the study. Fifteen patients presented to the emergency room or outpatient department with balanoposthitis. Forty-one patients with physiological phimosis received a circumcision. Preputial swab cultures were done. Differences in age, body weight, and preputial flora between these two groups of patients were compared.ResultsPatients with balanoposthitis in this study were significantly younger. Common uropathogens were predominant in patients with balanoposthitis, whereas in patients with physiological phimosis, the main isolates were enteric flora other than common uropathogens. Patients with a body weight higher than the 50th percentile of the normal growth curve had a lower risk of balanoposthitis (odds ratio = 0.212).Conclusions The preputial bacterial flora in patients with physiological phimosis may change from enteric flora to common uropathogens which are predominant in patients with balanoposthitis. Furthermore, patients at a younger age and with a lighter body weight also had increased susceptibility to balanoposthitis.
    Urological Science 12/2012; 23(4):114–117.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Male circumcision has been carried out as a prophylactic measure against future diseases, as well as a rite of passage due to religious practice and definite medical indication. The present review discusses the benefits of male circumcision on the prevention of urinary tract infections, and the importance of circumcision in congenital urinary system anomalies, such as vesicoureteral reflux. Additionally the present review examines the associations between circumcision and sexually transmitted infections, including human immunodeficiency virus, and the preventive effect of circumcision on penile cancer and cervical cancer of female partners.
    International Journal of Urology 04/2013; · 1.80 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
Nov 13, 2014