Article

Histological and clinical outcome after liver transplantation for hepatitis C.

Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Hepatology (Impact Factor: 12). 01/1998; 26(6):1646-52. DOI: 10.1002/hep.510260638
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Hepatitis frequently recurs after liver transplantation for hepatitis C. However, the histological progression of disease, predictors of recurrence and disease severity, and patient survival remain uncertain. Fifty-five patients with cirrhosis caused by chronic hepatitis C underwent liver transplantation between January 1990 and December 1993. Hepatitis C genotype was determined, and liver biopsies were performed at frequent intervals posttransplantation. The median follow-up time was 40.4 months. The cumulative rate of survival was no different in liver transplant recipients for hepatitis C than in liver transplant recipients for other chronic liver diseases (P = .62). Histological recurrent hepatitis C developed in 33 of 50 patients assessable for disease recurrence; the median recurrence-free survival time was 13.4 months. Histological activity and stage were mild in most cases. Only 2 patients developed cirrhosis, and no patient required a second transplantation for recurrent disease. Patients with acute cellular rejection had a shorter recurrence-free survival (P = .0141). In patients with recurrent hepatitis, rejection also was correlated with increased histological grade 2 years after transplantation (P = .0061). Recurrence-free survival was decreased in patients infected with genotype 1 (1a and 1b combined) compared with genotypes 2 and 3 combined (P = .02), whereas there was no difference between genotypes 1a and 1b (P > .80). Only patients infected with genotype 1a or 1b developed bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis. In addition, patients who had an early recurrence had a greater risk of progressing to bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis (hazard ratio, 5.1; P = .0473). In our experience, recurrent hepatitiS C after liver transplantation in most cases is mild and survival is unaffected. Both acute cellular rejection and infection with genotype 1 are independent risk factors for reduced recurrence-free survival, and early recurrence is associated with a higher risk of disease progression.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
46 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation worldwide; however, recurrence post transplant is almost universal and follows an accelerated course. Around 30% of patients develop aggressive HCV recurrence, leading to rapid fibrosis progression (RFP) and culminating in liver failure and either death or retransplantation. Despite many advances in our knowledge of clinical risks for HCV RFP, we are still unable to accurately predict those most at risk of adverse outcomes, and no clear consensus exists on the best approach to management. This review presents a critical overview of clinical factors shown to influence the course of HCV recurrence post transplant, with particular focus on recent data identifying the important role of metabolic factors, such as insulin resistance, in HCV recurrence. Emerging data for genetic markers of HCV recurrence and their usefulness for predicting adverse outcomes will also be explored.
    Transplant Infectious Disease 12/2013; · 1.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Both donor and recipient race impact outcomes after liver transplantation (LT), especially for hepatitis C virus (HCV). The interaction and simultaneous impact of both on patient survival is not clearly defined. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of donor and recipient race on recipient and graft survival after HCV-related LT using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. A total of 16,053 recipients (75.5% white, 9.3% black, and 15.2% Hispanic) who underwent primary LT for HCV between 1998 and 2008 were included. Cox regression models were used to assess the association between recipient/donor race and patient survival. A significant interaction between donor and recipient race was noted (P=0.01). Black recipients with white donors had a higher risk of patient mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-1.87) compared with that of white recipients with white donors. In contrast, the pairing of Hispanic recipients with black donors was associated with a lower risk of recipient mortality compared with that of white recipients with white donors (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.87). Similar results were noted for graft failure. In conclusion, the impact of donor and recipient race on patient survival varies substantially by the matching of recipient/donor race.
    Transplantation 02/2012; 93(4):444-9. · 3.78 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although the morphological features of hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) have been well established in the last decades, the differential diagnosis still represents a challenge for the pathologist, especially early recurrent hepatitis C vs mild acute cellular rejection. The present review focuses on the role of the pathologist and the pathology laboratory in the management of recipients with recurrent hepatitis C, the usefulness of early and late post-OLT liver biopsies, and the potential role of ancillary techniques (immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, RT-PCR). The English literature on the topic is reviewed, focusing on the histopathology, the immunohistochemistry and the use of RT-PCR on HCV-positive post-OLT biopsies. The different histopathological illustrations of early and chronic recurrent hepatitis C are presented, with special focus on the main differential diagnoses and those features with prognostic relevance (cholestasis above all). The usefulness of ancillary techniques are discussed, especially HCV RNA quantitation by RT-PCR. Finally, the usefulness of long-term protocol biopsies is addressed: their usefulness for the study of allograft disease progression is clear, but their meaning in the long term is still debated. The significance of plasma cell infiltrate in HCV-positive allografts, the prognostic weight of graft steatosis, and the impact of donor age in recurrent hepatitis C also represent additional open issues.
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 03/2014; 20(11):2810-2824. · 2.55 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads