Article

Estimation of the clinically diagnosed proportion of sleep apnea syndrome in middle-aged men and women.

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53705, USA.
Sleep (Impact Factor: 5.06). 10/1997; 20(9):705-6.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The proportion of sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) in the general adult population that goes undiagnosed was estimated from a sample of 4,925 employed adults. Questionnaire data on doctor-diagnosed sleep apnea were followed up to ascertain the prevalence of diagnosed sleep apnea. In-laboratory polysomnography on a subset of 1,090 participants was used to estimate screen-detected sleep apnea. In this population, without obvious barriers to health care for sleep disorders, we estimate that 93% of women and 82% of men with moderate to severe SAS have not been clinically diagnosed. These findings provide a baseline for assessing health care resource needs for sleep apnea.

4 Followers
 · 
125 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Snore related signals (SRS) have been found to carry important information about the snore source and obstruction site in the upper airway of an Obstructive Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea Syndrome (OSAHS) patient. An overnight audio recording of an individual subject is the preliminary and essential material for further study and diagnosis. Automatic detection, segmentation and classification of SRS from overnight audio recordings are significant in establishing a personal health database and in researching the area on a large scale. In this study, the authors focused on how to implement this intelligent method by combining acoustic signal processing with machine learning techniques. The authors proposed a systematic solution includes SRS events detection, classifier training, automatic segmentation and classification. An overnight audio recording of a severe OSAHS patient is taken as an example to demonstrate the feasibility of their method. Both the experimental data testing and subjective testing of 25 volunteers (17 males and 8 females) demonstrated that their method could be effective in automatic detection, segmentation and classification of the SRS from original audio recordings.
    Signal Processing, IET 02/2015; 9(1):21-29. DOI:10.1049/iet-spr.2013.0266
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common condition in which there are intermittent partial and complete limitations in airflow, with associated hypoxia and sympathetic arousals, during sleep. Many patients presenting to our sleep disorders clinic reported being elbowed or poked by their bed partner because of snoring or witnessed apneic spells. The aim of this work is to explore if a screening questionnaire can be used for detection of OSA patients.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To validate the Malay version of Berlin Questionnaire (BQ) as a tool to screen for patients at risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in primary care. Most patients with OSA are unrecognised and untreated. Thus, the BQ has been used as a tool to screen for patients at risk for OSA. However, this tool has not been validated in Malay version. A parallel back-to-back translation method was applied to produce the Malay version (Berlin-M). The Malay version was administered to 150 patients in a tertiary respiratory medical centre. Concurrent validity of the Berlin-M was determined using the Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) as the gold standard measure. The test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the Berlin-M were determined. Most patients were males (64.0%) and majority of them were Malays (63.3%). Based on the sleep study test, 121 (84.0%) were classified as high risk while 23 (16.0%) as low risk using the Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) ≥5 as the cutoff point. The test-retest reliability Kappa value showed a good range between 0.864 - 1.000. The Cronbach's alpha of BQ was 0.750 in category 1 and 0.888 in category 2. The sensitivity and specificity were 92% and 17% respectively. The BQ showed high sensitivity (92%) but low specificity (17%). Therefore, though the Berlin-M is useful as a screening tool, it is not a confirmatory diagnostic tool.