Article

Risk and incidence of asthma attributable to occupational exposure among HMO members.

Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
American Journal of Industrial Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.97). 02/1998; 33(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199801)33:13.0.CO;2-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Occupational asthma may account for a significant proportion of adult-onset asthma, but incidence estimates from surveillance of physician reports and workers' compensation data (0.9 to 15/100,000) are lower than expected from community-based cross-sectional studies of asthma patients. We conducted a prospective cohort study of 79,204 health maintenance organization members between the ages of 15 and 55 at risk for asthma. Computerized files, medical records, and telephone interviews were used to identify and characterize asthma cases. Evidence for asthma attributable to occupational exposure was determined from work-related symptoms and workplace exposure. The annual incidence of clinically significant, new-onset asthma was 1.3/1,000, and increased to 3.7/1,000 when cases with reactivation of previously quiescent asthma were included. Criteria for onset of clinically significant asthma attributable to occupational exposure were met by 21% (95% CI 12-32%) of cases giving an incidence of 71/100,000 (95% CI 43-111). Physicians documented asking about work-related symptoms in 15% of charts, and recorded suggestive symptoms in three cases, but did not obtain occupational medicine consultation, diagnose occupational asthma, report to the state surveillance program, or bill workers' compensation for any of them. These data suggest that the incidence of asthma attributable to occupational exposures is significantly higher than previously reported, and accounts for a sizable proportion of adult-onset asthma.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
67 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current asthma prevalence among adults in the United States has reached historically high levels. Although national-level estimates indicate that asthma prevalence among adults increased by 33% from 2000 to 2009, state-specific temporal trends of current asthma prevalence and their contributing risk factors have not been explored. We used 2000--2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from all 50 states and the District of Columbia (D.C.) to estimate state-specific current asthma prevalence by 2-year periods (2000--2001, 2002--2003, 2004--2005, 2006--2007, 2008--2009). We fitted a series of four logistic-regression models for each state to evaluate whether there was a statistically significant linear change in the current asthma prevalence over time, accounting for sociodemographic factors, smoking status, and weight status (using body mass index as the indicator). During 2000--2009, current asthma prevalence increased in all 50 states and D.C., with significant increases in 46/50 (92%) states and D.C. After accounting for weight status in the model series with sociodemographic factors, and smoking status, 10 states (AR, AZ, IA, IL, KS, ME, MT, UT, WV, and WY) that had previously shown a significant increase did not show a significant increase in current asthma prevalence. There was a significant increasing trend in state-specific current asthma prevalence among adults from 2000 to 2009 in most states in the United States. Obesity prevalence appears to contribute to increased current asthma prevalence in some states.
    BMC Public Health 12/2013; 13(1):1156. · 2.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Occupational injuries and illnesses affect the productivity of the US workforce, yet public health surveillance in the United States does not adequately track and report these incidents. Adding industry and occupation standards to US hospital data collection would enable physicians, researchers, and payors to accurately account for occupational injuries and illnesses as well as support prevention initiatives. The authors petitioned for the inclusion of standards for industry and occupation within hospital data; however, additional support from the occupational and environmental health community is needed to move the petition to adoption. This article discusses the policy implications and benefits to occupational medicine and public health provided by collecting industry and occupation in hospital discharge data, as well as the process of initiating a data change request with the National Uniform Billing Committee.
    Journal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 04/2013; · 1.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Examining occupations other than those held when asthma symptoms first developed may not correctly identify occupations with higher risk of asthma onset. To determine the occupation held when individuals first developed asthma symptoms, we examined 2010 National Health Interview Survey data for working adults with current asthma. Overall 37.1% of working adults with current asthma developed asthma while employed. Of these, the highest proportions of individuals identified office and administrative support (13.3%), sales and related (9.4%), and management (8.5%) as the occupation held when asthma first developed; 37.8% had a different current occupation than at asthma onset, and estimates of a change in occupation were highest for those who developed asthma while working in business and financial operations (49.3%), sales and related (48.6%), and healthcare support (43.8%) occupations. Future population-based studies should further examine associations between asthma and occupation held at time of asthma onset. Am. J. Ind. Med. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.(†)
    American Journal of Industrial Medicine 06/2013; · 1.97 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
8 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014