Article

Eosinophils in acute appendicitis: possible significance.

Department of Pathology, Medical College, Calicut.
Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology (Impact Factor: 0.68). 11/1997; 40(4):491-8.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT 120 consecutive appendicectomies and 20 appendices from medicolegal autopsies were studied. The cases were grouped as. A: Acute appendicitis. B: Acute presentation, not diagnostic of acute appendicitis C: Elective appendicectomies D: Normal appendices from autopsies. Eosinophils and mast cells were counted in the muscularis, in Giemsa stained sections. The mean eosinophil and mast cell counts per mm2 were--A. 215.9; 26.5. B. 66.0; 32.1. C. 6.7; 25.8. D. 4.2; 19.6 respectively. Eosinophil count is significantly higher in A compared to others (p < 0.0001) and there was no range overlap with C and D. B is a heterogenous group with 37.5% having eosinophil counts in the range seen in A. Cases with mural eosinophil showed histological evidence of mast cell degranulation. Eosinophil infiltration of the muscularis is an early event universally seen in acute appendicitis. It is possible that the disease is triggered by Type I Hypersensitivity, and that infection is a later consequence.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
272 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Twenty to thirty percent appendices removed from patients with suspected appendicitis appear normal on histology. The cause of pain in these patients is unknown. The presence of eosinophils and mast cells should be looked at skeptically which may explain the cause of pain. The aim was to study the eosinophils, mast cells, nerves and ganglions in normal and inflamed appendices. A total of 329 appendices including 192 case of acute appendicitis (group A), 94 cases of clinically acute but histologically normal appendices (group B), 13 cases of complementary/elective appendicectomies (group C) and 30 normal controls from medico-legal autopsies(group D), were studied for the presence of eosinophils, mast cells, nerves and ganglia in mucosa, submucosa and muscularis propria. Routine haematoxylin and eosin stained sections were used for eosinophils, nerves and ganglia and Toludine blue sections for mast cell counts. One way ANOVA and logistic regression was used for statistical analysis The mean eosinophil and mast cell counts were significantly higher in mucosa, submucosa and muscularis propria in Group A and B, when compared to group C+D. The number of nerves and ganglion cells were significantly higher in group A when compared to groups B and C+D. The correlation between eosinophil and mast cell count was not found to be statistically significant. A significant increase in Eosinophils, mast cells, nerves and ganglion cells was seen in acute appendicitis. Increase in eosinophils and mast cells may explain the pain in histologicaly normal but clinically suspected acute appendicitis.
    Indian Journal of Surgery 10/2008; 70(5):231-4. · 0.09 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Data indicate that appendicectomy for intra-abdominal inflammation protects against inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This suggests an important role for the appendix in mucosal immunity. There is no established model of appendicitis. We therefore developed a murine model of appendicitis and examined the effect of inflammation on appendiceal lymphocyte constituents. The caecal patch of specific pathogen-free (SPF)-Balb/c mice was transformed into an obstructed 'appendiceal pouch' by standardized suction and band ligation. Mice were killed and 'pouches' removed for histology and phenotypic analysis of leucocytes by flow cytometry. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All 'pouches' developed features resembling human appendicitis - mucosal ulceration, transmural inflammation with neutrophils, lymphocytes and occasional eosinophils, and serositis. These changes were most evident between days 7 and 10. There was significant elevation of serum CRP (8.0 +/- 0.3 ng/ml to 40.0 +/- 3.1 ng/ml; P < 0.01), indicating systemic inflammation. Following the initial neutrophil-predominant response, there was an increase in CD4(+) (15.3% +/- 1.2% to 31.0 +/- 2.0%; P < 0.01) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes (3.7% +/- 0.6% to 9.2 +/- 0.8%; P < 0.01). CD25(+) forkhead box P3 (FoxP3)(+) regulatory T lymphocytes were increased by 66% (P < 0.01). Furthermore, significant increases in CD8(+) FoxP3(+) regulatory T lymphocytes were restricted to younger mice (age < 10 weeks, P < 0.003). This is the first description of a murine model of appendicitis. Inflammation resulted in T lymphocyte accumulation associated with an increase in regulatory T lymphocytes, which might explain the age-dependent protective phenomenon. Further exploration will provide insights into the mechanisms of intestinal immune homeostasis and the immunopathogenesis of IBD.
    Clinical & Experimental Immunology 10/2007; 150(1):169-78. · 3.41 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although acute appendicitis is frequent, it is subject to common misconceptions. Furthermore, there is little good evidence to support some of our beliefs. This report reviews the role of the anatomic pathologist in diagnosis when acute appendicitis is suspected clinically and discusses what is known of its pathology. The conclusions that can be legitimately drawn from the literature are emphasized. A classification is proposed that incorporates intraluminal inflammation, acute mucosal inflammation, acute mucosal and submucosal inflammation, suppurative (phlegmonous) appendicitis, gangrenous appendicitis, and periappendicitis, and the significance of each of these diagnoses is discussed. The etiology and pathogenesis of acute appendicitis is reviewed. Contrary to popular belief, the best evidence indicates that obstruction is unlikely to be the primary cause, at least in the majority of cases. Ancillary techniques in the diagnosis of appendicitis, including laparoscopy and peritoneal aspiration cytology, are discussed.
    Annals of Diagnostic Pathology 03/2000; 4(1):46-58. · 0.98 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
28 Downloads
Available from
May 22, 2014