Article

Efficacy and safety of oral low-dose tacrolimus treatment in liver transplantation.

Unidad de Trasplante Hepatico, Servicio de Cirugia General, Hospital General Vall de Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain.
Transplant International (Impact Factor: 3.16). 02/1998; 11 Suppl 1:S260-6. DOI: 10.1007/s001470050474
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Eighty-four adult patients were recruited from four centres in Spain to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose (0.1 mg/kg per day) oral tacrolimus plus corticosteroid immunosuppression in liver transplantation. The median daily dose of tacrolimus was increased during the first 3 weeks of therapy from an initial dose of 0.1 mg/kg per day to a maximum of 0.145 mg/kg per day and was subsequently decreased gradually to a minimum of 0.076 mg/kg per day at 1 year. At 7 days posttransplantation, 87.7% of patients had trough whole blood levels of tacrolimus within the therapeutic range (5-20 ng/ml), and the median levels remained fairly constant during the rest of the year (10.1-11.8 ng/ml). None of the patients required intravenous administration of tacrolimus. At 1 year, Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that 73.8% of the patients were receiving tacrolimus monotherapy without the need for corticosteroids. One-year patient and graft survival were 75.9% and 72.3%, respectively. The incidence of acute rejection was 51.2%; 9.5% of cases resolved spontaneously without antirejection therapy and 10.7% were corticosteroid resistant. Only 1 patient (1.2%) developed chronic rejection. The most important adverse events were hypertension (45.2%), tremor (44.0%), diabetes mellitus (33.3%), diarrhoea (31%) and nephrotoxicity (29.8%). Severe neurotoxicity-like convulsions (4.8%), dysarthria (9.5%), delirium (1.2%), coma (1.2%) and the need for haemodialysis (3 patients) were uncommon. In conclusion, low-dose oral tacrolimus immunosuppression is associated with low toxicity without compromising efficacy.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
80 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several neurological side effects induced by tacrolimus are described in the scientific literature, ranging from mild neurological symptoms to delirium and psychosis. We report the case of a 46-year-old man with no prior psychiatric history who suddenly manifested manic-like psychosis associated with elevated trough tacrolimus blood concentrations 17 years after kidney transplant. The use of antipsychotics may improve the severity of symptoms; but in order to obtain a complete remission, the reduction in the dose of tacrolimus, or its replacement with alternative immunosuppressant therapies, is recommended.
    Case reports in psychiatry. 01/2013; 2013:926395.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Banff schema incorporates a semiquantitative scoring system for grading of acute cellular rejection (ACR) of the liver allograft. The Banff rejection activity index (RAI) comprises 3 components scored from 0 to 3: venous endothelial inflammation (E); bile duct damage (B); and portal inflammation (P); the scores are combined to an overall score (the RAI). The purpose of this research was to determine the prognostic value of the Banff RAI score in predicting the response to increased immunosuppression and the long-term outcome of the graft. A retrospective study was done of patients undergoing primary liver transplantation between January 2000 and October 2004 with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression; 495 patients were included, 231 had histologically-confirmed ACR, 193 responded to 1 cycle of high-dose steroids. There was no correlation between the total RAI score and response to steroids, resistant rejection, development of chronic rejection, or graft survival. The E score was related to patient survival, a lower score being associated with a worse outcome (P = 0.048). In multivariable analysis, serum bilirubin, serum aspartate aminotransferase, and E score were significant predictors of death (P = 0.012). In univariable analysis, B score and bilirubin were significantly related to "resistant rejection" (P = 0.018 and 0.002, respectively), but only bilirubin was significant in multivariable analysis (logistic regression). In conclusion, although the Banff RAI score is a useful marker of the severity of rejection, neither the total RAI score nor any of the individual components correlated with response to steroids or graft survival.
    Liver Transplantation 08/2006; 12(7):1144-51. · 3.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Refractory rejections still occur in the liver transplantation (LT) field. The aim of this study was to investigate significant factors for the introduction of therapy with muromonab-CD3 (MCD3) after LT. A total of 1415 LT patients were retrospectively evaluated, and 11 of the recipients received MCD3 therapy because of steroid-resistant rejections. The clinical factors before LT and before MCD3 therapy were investigated. The recipients were retrospectively divided into two groups based on responses to MCD3 therapy, including their clinical courses after MCD3 therapy and their outcomes. The MCD3 therapy had positive effects in LT recipients with the following four factors: low score of model for end-stage liver disease or pediatric end-stage liver disease; earlier time point of the first incidence of rejection; more frequent steroid pulse therapy (SPT) within 2 weeks after LT; and the expression of CD3 in the peripheral blood before MCD3 introduction. Optimal induction of MCD3 triggered recovery from refractory rejections, especially in LT recipients in a stable condition, but not in those in a critical or compromised condition.
    Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. 05/2010; 17(6):885-91.

Full-text

View
32 Downloads
Available from
Jun 2, 2014