Article

A simple method of sample size calculation for linear and logistic regression.

CSPCC, Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto Health Care System (151-K), California 94304, USA.
Statistics in Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.04). 08/1998; 17(14):1623-34. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980730)17:143.0.CO;2-S
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A sample size calculation for logistic regression involves complicated formulae. This paper suggests use of sample size formulae for comparing means or for comparing proportions in order to calculate the required sample size for a simple logistic regression model. One can then adjust the required sample size for a multiple logistic regression model by a variance inflation factor. This method requires no assumption of low response probability in the logistic model as in a previous publication. One can similarly calculate the sample size for linear regression models. This paper also compares the accuracy of some existing sample-size software for logistic regression with computer power simulations. An example illustrates the methods.

1 Bookmark
 · 
592 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Body mass index (BMI) is a strong predictor of mortality in the general population. In spite of the medical hazards of obesity, a protective effect on mortality has been suggested in surgical patients: the obesity paradox. The aim of the present nationwide cohort study was to examine the association between BMI and mortality in patients treated surgically for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU).Methods This was a national prospective cohort study of all Danish patients treated surgically for PPU between 1 February 2003 and 31 August 2009, for whom BMI was registered. Non-surgically treated patients and those with malignant ulcers were excluded. The primary outcome measure was 90-day mortality. The association between BMI and mortality was calculated as crude and adjusted relative risks (RRs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (c.i.).ResultsOf 2668 patients who underwent surgical treatment for PPU, 1699 (63·7 per cent) had BMI recorded. Median age was 69·4 (range 17·6–100·9) years and 53·7 per cent of the patients were women. Some 1126 patients (66·3 per cent) had at least one of six co-morbid diseases; 728 (42·8 per cent) had an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade of III or more. A total of 471 patients (27·7 per cent) died within 90 days of surgery. Being underweight was associated with a more than twofold increased risk of death following surgery for PPU (adjusted RR 2·26, 95 per cent c.i. 1·37 to 3·71). No statistically significant association was found between obesity and mortality.Conclusion Being underweight was associated with increased mortality in patients with PPU, whereas being overweight or obese was neither protective nor an adverse prognostic factor.
    British Journal of Surgery 05/2014; · 4.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of cancer related therapy in cancer patients at the end-of-life has increased over time in many countries. Given a lack of published Swiss data, the objective of this study was to describe delivery of health care during the last month before death of cancer patients.
    BMC Cancer 05/2014; 14(1):306. · 3.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clinical supervision is an essential element in training genetic counselors. Although live supervision has been identified as the most common supervision technique utilized in genetic counseling, there is limited information on factors influencing its use as well as the use of other techniques. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers supervisors face when implementing supervision techniques. All participants (N = 141) reported utilizing co-counseling. This was most used with novice students (96.1 %) and intermediate students (93.7 %). Other commonly used techniques included live supervision where the supervisor is silent during session (98.6 %) which was used most frequently with advanced students (94.0 %), and student self-report (64.7 %) used most often with advanced students (61.2 %). Though no barrier to these commonly used techniques was identified by a majority of participants, the most frequently reported barriers included time and concern about patient's welfare. The remaining supervision techniques (live remote observation, video, and audio recording) were each used by less than 10 % of participants. Barriers that significantly influenced use of these techniques included lack of facilities/equipment and concern about patient reactions to technique. Understanding barriers to implementation of supervisory techniques may allow students to be efficiently trained in the future by reducing supervisor burnout and increasing the diversity of techniques used.
    Journal of Genetic Counseling 05/2014; · 1.45 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
106 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014