Article

Grain feeding and the dissemination of acid-resistant Escherichia coli from cattle

Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Microbiology, Cornell University and Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ithaca, NY 14853-8101, USA.
Science (Impact Factor: 31.48). 10/1998; 281(5383):1666-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.281.5383.1666
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The gastric stomach of humans is a barrier to food-borne pathogens, but Escherichia coli can survive at pH 2.0 if it is grown under mildly acidic conditions. Cattle are a natural reservoir for pathogenic E. coli, and cattle fed mostly grain had lower colonic pH and more acid-resistant E. coli than cattle fed only hay. On the basis of numbers and survival after acid shock, cattle that were fed grain had 10(6)-fold more acid-resistant E. coli than cattle fed hay, but a brief period of hay feeding decreased the acid-resistant count substantially.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Francisco Diez-Gonzalez, Jul 02, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
265 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the effect of diet on the survival of Salmonella in the bovine abomasum. Five fistulated cows were randomly assigned to one of five diets denoted as: (i) 100% grass, (ii) grass + 5·3 kg DM concentrate, (iii) 100% grass silage, (iv) 100% hay and (v) maize/grass silage plus concentrates. Rumen fluid was harvested from each dietary treatment and inoculated with nonacid (NA) and acid-adapted (AA) 5-strain Salmonella cocktails. After 24-h incubation period, Salmonella were acid challenged to synthetic abomasum fluid (SAF, pH 2·5) for 5 h to determine their resistance to low pH. The study found that the volatile fatty acids composition and the pH profile of bovine rumen fluid were significantly altered (P <0·05) by some of the dietary treatments but not others. Regression analysis found that significantly higher numbers of acid-adapted Salmonella survived in SAF after incubation in rumen fluid from diets 1, 2 and 4, but fewer significant differences were found between diets for nonacid-adapted Salmonella. The results suggest that the acid-adapted cells were subjected to a higher level of cell injury than the nonadapted cells.  Pre-incubation in rumen fluid did influence the resistance of nonacid and acid-adapted Salmonella to SAF but it was dependant on the dietary treatment fed to the cows.  This study examined the use of diet, as a modulating factor to limit the bovine excretion of Salmonella with a view to providing a scientific basis for the design of dietary management controls in the future.
    Journal of Applied Microbiology 12/2010; 109(6):2060-8. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04836.x · 2.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Escherichia coli O157 is an important foodborne pathogen affecting human health and the beef cattle industry. Contamination of carcasses at slaughter is correlated to the prevalence of E. coli O157 in cattle feces. Many associations have been made between dietary factors and E. coli O157 prevalence in cattle feces. Preharvest interventions, such as diet management, could reduce the fecal prevalence and diminish the impact of this adulterant. Dietary influences, including grain type and processing method, forage quality, and distillers grains have all been associated with E. coli O157 prevalence. In addition, several plant compounds, including phenolic acids and essential oils, have been proposed as in-feed intervention strategies. The specific mechanisms responsible for increased or decreased E. coli O157 shedding or survival are not known but are often attributed to changes in hindgut ecology induced by diet types. Some interventions may have a direct bacterial effect. Frequently, results of studies are conflicting or not repeatable, which speaks to the complexity of the hindgut ecosystem, variation in animal feed utilization, and variation within feed products. Still, understanding specific mechanisms, driven by diet influences, responsible for E. coli O157 shedding will aid in the development and implementation of better and practical preharvest intervention strategies.
    Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 10/2009; 6(7):785-92. DOI:10.1089/fpd.2009.0306 · 2.09 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Escherichia coli are commensal bacteria that can account for up to 1% of the bacterial population of the gut. Ruminant animals are reservoirs of the pathogenic bacteria E. coli strain O157:H7, and approximately 30% of feedlot cattle shed E. coli O157:H7. Feedlot and high-producing dairy cattle are fed high grain rations in order to increase feed efficiency. When cattle are fed high grain rations, some starch escapes ruminal microbial degradation and passes to the hindgut where it undergoes fermentation. Ten years ago researchers demonstrated that populations of total E. coli were higher in grain-fed than in forage-fed cattle, and when cattle were abruptly switched from a high grain diet to an all hay diet, total E. coli populations declined 1000-fold within 5 days and reduced the ability of the surviving E. coli to survive an acid shock mimicking passage through the human gastric stomach. This research provoked many questions about the effects of diet or E. coli O157:H7 populations that have not been conclusively answered to date. Subsequent research has shown that diet does affect E. coli O157:H7 populations, but the effects have varied in magnitude and impact. Further studies have demonstrated that the effects of forage feeding on E. coli O157:H7 populations may be due to concentrations of tannins and phenolic acids in forages. Other ration components such as rapidly ruminally fermented grains (e.g., barley) increase the shedding of E. coli O157:H7, and in some situations, feeding distillers grains can increase fecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 due to VFA concentrations. Data from researchers across North America indicate that diet does impact STEC/EHEC populations in cattle prior to slaughter; however the economic, logistic and practical impacts of dietary changes must be examined and accounted for.
    Current issues in molecular biology 05/2009; · 6.00 Impact Factor