Relationship between cutaneous pressure threshold and two-point discrimination

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery (Impact Factor: 1.01). 09/1998; 14(6):417-21. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1000202
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The amount of pressure that should be applied when doing the two-point discrimination test has always been a matter of controversy. The Pressure-specified Sensory Devices permits recording the pressure at which two-point discrimination (2 PD) occurs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the cutaneous pressure threshold and 2PD in people with normal and abnormal peripheral nerve functions. The Pressure-specified Sensory Devices was used to quantify the cutaneous pressure threshold in the index-finger pulp in each individual, between the range of 2 mm and 8 mm of static 2 PD, using 1-mm intervals. Twenty normal controls were examined; ten patients were less than 45 years of age; and ten patients were greater than 45 years of age. This relationship of pressure to 2PD was also tested in eight patients with abnormal peripheral nerve function (four patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, and four patients with diabetic neuropathy). A curvilinear relationship was identified in which, for the same skin surface in the same individual, regardless of age or presence of nerve compression or neuropathy, the cutaneous pressure threshold was inversely related to static 2PD. This curve shifted upward and to the right with the increasing age of the normal population and with neurologic impairment. The awareness of this neurophysiologic relationship between 2PD and pressure threshold permits the design of strategies for sensibility testing and provides a basis for the interpretation of sensory test results.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To measure tactile discrimination (static and moving 2-point discrimination) and threshold levels (Weinstein enhanced sensory test) over the nail plate in normal subjects and compare these values with those at the corresponding finger pulps. Tactile discrimination and threshold values over the nail plates and finger pulps were measured on 300 digits in 30 healthy subjects with a mean age of 23 years. Subjects with cosmetic nail modifications, injuries, neurological deficits, dermatological conditions, or history of upper limb surgery were excluded. Equivalence testing was conducted to look for clinical equivalence between values obtained at both sites. The mean static 2-point discrimination, moving 2-point discrimination, and threshold value over the human nail were 6.7 mm, 2.4 mm, and 0.06 g, respectively. The corresponding values for the finger pulp were 2.4 mm, 2.2 mm, and 0.01 g, respectively. The static 2-point discrimination and threshold values were superior for the finger pulp, whereas moving 2-point discrimination values at both sites were clinically equivalent. Our study suggests that tactile discrimination and threshold levels can be measured over the nail plate and that moving 2-point discrimination values are clinically equivalent to those obtained on the corresponding pulp. This highlights the importance of the nail plate in the sensory function of the fingertip. The normative data from this study may be useful in establishing the impact of nail injury and the contribution of the nail to the overall function of the hand. Diagnostic II.
    The Journal of hand surgery 11/2013; 38(11):2159-63. DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.08.112 · 1.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Peripheral neuropathy is the most common neurological complication of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection but is widely under-diagnosed in resource-limited settings. We investigated the utility of screening tools administered by nonphysician healthcare workers (HCW) and quantitative sensory testing (QST) administered by trained individuals for identification of moderate/severe neuropathy. We enrolled 240 HIV-infected outpatients using 2-stage cluster randomized sampling. HCWs administered the several screening tools. Trained study staff performed QST. Tools were validated against a clinical diagnosis of neuropathy. Participants were 65% women, mean age 36.4 years, median CD4 324 cells/μL. A total of 65% were taking antiretrovirals, and 18% had moderate/severe neuropathy. The screening tests were 76% sensitive in diagnosing moderate/severe neuropathy with negative predictive values of 84-92%. QST was less sensitive but more specific. Screening tests administered by HCW have excellent negative predictive values and are promising tools for scale-up in resource-limited settings. QST shows promise for research use. Muscle Nerve, 2013.
    Muscle & Nerve 10/2013; 48(4). DOI:10.1002/mus.23795 · 2.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUÇÃO: Determinar e comparar limiares de sensibilidade cutânea nos pés de pacientes diabéticos com úlcera em apenas um dos membros inferiores. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: 20 pacientes foram estudados, a média de idade e de conhecimento do diabetes foi 61,6 e 12,4 anos, respectivamente. Todos os pacientes foram previamente testados com o monofilamento de Semmes-Weinstein nº 5,07. A sensibilidade foi avaliada usando o teste de discriminação entre dois pontos e o PSSD™ (Pressure-Specified Sensory Device) para avaliar os limiares de sensibilidade de maneira quantitativa, em g/mm2. Testadas três áreas da pele: polpa do hálux, dorso do pé e parte medial do calcâneo, incluindo-se quatro testes, um ponto estático, um ponto dinâmico, dois pontos estáticos e dois pontos dinâmicos. RESULTADOS: A distância média de discriminação de dois pontos em mm foi superior nos pés com úlceras, mas a diferença entre os membros inferiores teve significância estatística apenas para o hálux. Com o PSSD™, todos os pacientes tiveram limiares de pressão superior nos pés com úlcera, em comparação com os pés sem úlcera, em todos os testes e com significância estatística. CONCLUSÃO: O PSSD™ foi capaz de diferenciar níveis de sensibilidade entre membros com e sem úlcera em pacientes diabéticos, com significância estatística.
    Acta Ortopédica Brasileira 12/2009; 18(2):71-74. · 0.16 Impact Factor